Rac1 and RhoA: Networks, loops and bistability

ABSTRACT Cell migration requires a precise temporal and spatial coordination of several processes which allow the cell to efficiently move. The extension and retraction of membrane protrusion, as well as adhesion are controlled by the Rho-family small GTPases. Two members of the family, Rac1 and RhoA, can show opposite behaviors and spatial localisations, with RhoA being active toward the rear of the cell and regulating its retraction during migration, whereas Rac1 is active toward the front of the cell. In addition to the spatial segregation, RhoA and Rac1 activity at the leading edge of the cells has an element of temporal segregation, with RhoA and Rac1 activities peaking at separate points during the migratory cycle of protrusion and retraction. Elements of this separation have been explained by the presence of 2 mutually inhibitory feedbacks, where Rac1 inhibits RhoA and RhoA in turn can inhibit Rac1. Recently, it was shown that Rac1 and RhoA activity and downstream signaling respond in a bistable manner to perturbations of this network.

[1]  Ann Pellegrini.  Movement , 2011 .

[2]  Alan Hall,et al.  Rho family GTPases. , 2012, Biochemical Society transactions.

[3]  Sean R. Collins,et al.  Locally excitable Cdc42 signals steer cells during chemotaxis , 2015, Nature Cell Biology.

[4]  Gaudenz Danuser,et al.  Coordination of Rho GTPase activities during cell protrusion , 2009, Nature.

[5]  F. Nakamura.  FilGAP and its close relatives: a mediator of Rho-Rac antagonism that regulates cell morphology and migration. , 2013, The Biochemical journal.

[6]  Jingsong Xu,et al.  Divergent Signals and Cytoskeletal Assemblies Regulate Self-Organizing Polarity in Neutrophils , 2003, Cell.

[7]  J. Hartwig,et al.  FilGAP, a Rho- and ROCK-regulated GAP for Rac binds filamin A to control actin remodelling , 2006, Nature Cell Biology.

[8]  Jacco van Rheenen,et al.  A Versatile Toolkit to Produce Sensitive FRET Biosensors to Visualize Signaling in Time and Space , 2013, Science Signaling.

[9]  E. Sahai,et al.  Rac Activation and Inactivation Control Plasticity of Tumor Cell Movement , 2008, Cell.

[10]  O. Pertz,et al.  Spatio-temporal co-ordination of RhoA, Rac1 and Cdc42 activation during prototypical edge protrusion and retraction dynamics , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[11]  J. Cherfils,et al.  Ras superfamily GEFs and GAPs: validated and tractable targets for cancer therapy? , 2010, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[12]  G. von Dassow,et al.  Activator-inhibitor coupling between Rho signaling and actin assembly make the cell cortex an excitable medium , 2015, Nature Cell Biology.

[13]  K. Burridge,et al.  Rho protein crosstalk: another social network? , 2011, Trends in cell biology.

[14]  M. Mann,et al.  Initial Quantitative Proteomic Map of 28 Mouse Tissues Using the SILAC Mouse* , 2013, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[15]  C. Dermardirossian,et al.  p21-activated Kinase 1 Phosphorylates and Regulates 14-3-3 Binding to GEF-H1, a Microtubule-localized Rho Exchange Factor* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[16]  K. Hahn,et al.  Spatiotemporal dynamics of RhoA activity in migrating cells , 2006, Nature.

[17]  Neil O Carragher,et al.  Bistability in the Rac1, PAK, and RhoA Signaling Network Drives Actin Cytoskeleton Dynamics and Cell Motility Switches , 2016, Cell systems.

[18]  Leah Edelstein-Keshet,et al.  Analysis of a minimal Rho-GTPase circuit regulating cell shape , 2016, Physical biology.

[19]  M. Mann,et al.  Comparative Proteomic Analysis of Eleven Common Cell Lines Reveals Ubiquitous but Varying Expression of Most Proteins* , 2012, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.