Fast unsupervised learning methods for structural health monitoring with large vibration data from dense sensor networks

Data-driven damage localization is an important step of vibration-based structural health monitoring. Statistical pattern recognition based on the prominent steps of feature extraction and statistical decision-making provides an effective and efficient framework for structural health monitoring. However, these steps may become time-consuming or complex when there are large volumes of vibration measurements acquired by dense sensor networks. To deal with this issue, this study proposes fast unsupervised learning methods for feature extraction through autoregressive modeling and damage localization through a new distance measure called Kullback–Leibler divergence with empirical probability measure. The feature extraction approach consists of an iterative algorithm for order selection and parameter estimation aiming to extract residuals in the training phase and another iterative process aiming to extract residuals only in the monitoring phase. The key feature of the proposed approach is the use of correlated residual samples of the autoregressive model as a new time series at each iteration, rather than handling the measured vibration response of the structure. This is shown to highly reduce the computational burden of order selection and feature extraction; moreover, it effectively provides low-order autoregressive models with uncorrelated residuals. The Kullback–Leibler divergence with empirical probability measure method exploits a segmentation technique to subdivide random data into independent sets and provides a distance metric based on the theory of empirical probability measure with no need to explicitly compute the actual probability distributions at the training and monitoring stages. Numerical and experimental benchmarks are then used to assess accuracy and performance of the proposed methods and compare them with some state-of-the-art approaches. Results show that the proposed approaches are successful in feature extraction and damage localization, with a reduced computational burden.

[1]  K. Law,et al.  Time series-based damage detection and localization algorithm with application to the ASCE benchmark structure , 2006 .

[2]  John E. Mottershead,et al.  The sensitivity method in finite element model updating: A tutorial (vol 25, pg 2275, 2010) , 2011 .

[3]  Piotr Omenzetter,et al.  Optimal selection of autoregressive model coefficients for early damage detectability with an application to wind turbine blades , 2016 .

[4]  Keith Worden,et al.  A cointegration approach for heteroscedastic data based on a time series decomposition: An application to structural health monitoring , 2019, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing.

[5]  K. Worden,et al.  Statistical Damage Classification Using Sequential Probability Ratio Tests , 2002 .

[6]  T. W. Anderson,et al.  Asymptotic Theory of Certain "Goodness of Fit" Criteria Based on Stochastic Processes , 1952 .

[7]  Jyrki Kullaa,et al.  Vibration-Based Structural Health Monitoring of a Simulated Beam with a Breathing Crack , 2013 .

[8]  Luis Eduardo Mujica,et al.  Q-statistic and T2-statistic PCA-based measures for damage assessment in structures , 2011 .

[9]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Influence of the Autoregressive Model Order on Damage Detection , 2011, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[10]  Eleni Chatzi,et al.  A Data-Driven Diagnostic Framework for Wind Turbine Structures: A Holistic Approach , 2017, Sensors.

[11]  Hashem Shariatmadar,et al.  Structural health monitoring by a new hybrid feature extraction and dynamic time warping methods under ambient vibration and non-stationary signals , 2019, Measurement.

[12]  Vicente Lopes,et al.  Adaptive filter feature identification for structural health monitoring in aeronautical panel , 2011 .

[13]  George Athanasopoulos,et al.  Forecasting: principles and practice , 2013 .

[14]  Hassan Sarmadi,et al.  Energy-based damage localization under ambient vibration and non-stationary signals by ensemble empirical mode decomposition and Mahalanobis-squared distance , 2019 .

[15]  Akira Mita,et al.  Localized Damage Detection of Structures Subject to Multiple Ambient Excitations Using Two Distance Measures for Autoregressive Models , 2009 .

[16]  Huaiyu Zhu On Information and Sufficiency , 1997 .

[17]  Claude Delpha,et al.  Kullback-Leibler Divergence for fault estimation and isolation : Application to Gamma distributed data , 2017 .

[18]  R. J. Barthorpe,et al.  On model- and data-based approaches to structural health monitoring , 2010 .

[19]  James M. W. Brownjohn,et al.  Gaussian Process Time-Series Models for Structures under Operational Variability , 2017, Front. Built Environ..

[20]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Structural Health Monitoring: A Machine Learning Perspective , 2012 .

[21]  Hoon Sohn,et al.  Structural Health Monitoring Using Statistical Process Control , 2000 .

[22]  Hae Young Noh,et al.  An energy-based sparse representation of ultrasonic guided-waves for online damage detection of pipelines under varying environmental and operational conditions , 2017 .

[23]  Alireza Entezami,et al.  A sensitivity‐based finite element model updating based on unconstrained optimization problem and regularized solution methods , 2020, Structural Control and Health Monitoring.

[24]  Abbas Karamodin,et al.  A new iterative model updating technique based on least squares minimal residual method using measured modal data , 2016 .

[25]  Sudib K. Mishra,et al.  Mahalanobis distance among the phase portraits as damage feature , 2018 .

[26]  Hashem Shariatmadar,et al.  An iterative order determination method for time-series modeling in structural health monitoring , 2018 .

[27]  Hashem Shariatmadar,et al.  Damage localization under ambient excitations and non-stationary vibration signals by a new hybrid algorithm for feature extraction and multivariate distance correlation methods , 2019 .

[28]  Spilios D. Fassois,et al.  Vibration-based damage precise localization in three-dimensional structures: Single versus multiple response measurements , 2015 .

[29]  Hashem Shariatmadar,et al.  Structural damage detection by a new iterative regularization method and an improved sensitivity function , 2017 .

[30]  P. Young,et al.  Time series analysis, forecasting and control , 1972, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[31]  Ward Heylen,et al.  Damage Detection with Parallel Genetic Algorithms and Operational Modes , 2010 .

[32]  Pizhong Qiao,et al.  Vibration-based Damage Identification Methods: A Review and Comparative Study , 2011 .

[33]  Hashem Shariatmadar,et al.  Data-driven damage diagnosis under environmental and operational variability by novel statistical pattern recognition methods , 2018, Structural Health Monitoring.

[34]  Piet M. T. Broersen,et al.  Finite sample criteria for autoregressive order selection , 2000, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[35]  Brendan McCabe,et al.  A Consistent Test for a Unit Root , 1994 .

[36]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  Experimental Phase II of the Structural Health Monitoring Benchmark Problem , 2003 .

[37]  Spilios D. Fassois,et al.  Vibration based health monitoring for a lightweight truss structure: experimental assessment of several statistical time series methods , 2010 .

[38]  Spilios D. Fassois,et al.  Statistical Time Series Methods for Structural Health Monitoring ∗ (Encyclopedia of Structural Health Monitoring, John Wiley & Sons: Contribution ID shm044) , 2008 .

[39]  Ying Wang,et al.  Structural damage identification based on self-fitting ARMAX model and multi-sensor data fusion , 2014 .

[40]  Marc Thomas,et al.  Operational modal analysis by updating autoregressive model , 2011 .

[41]  Samit Ray-Chaudhuri,et al.  ARX model-based damage sensitive features for structural damage localization using output-only measurements , 2015 .

[42]  Bill Gregory,et al.  On using robust Mahalanobis distance estimations for feature discrimination in a damage detection scenario , 2019 .

[43]  Peter Cawley,et al.  Structural health monitoring: Closing the gap between research and industrial deployment , 2018 .

[44]  Akira Mita,et al.  An Innovative Substructure Damage Identification Approach for Shear Structures Based on ARMAX Models , 2017 .

[45]  S. Eftekhar Azam,et al.  Online damage detection via a synergy of proper orthogonal decomposition and recursive Bayesian filters , 2017 .

[46]  Fotis Kopsaftopoulos,et al.  A stochastic global identification framework for aerospace structures operating under varying flight states , 2018 .

[47]  D. Dickey,et al.  Identifying damage locations under ambient vibrations utilizing vector autoregressive models and Mahalanobis distances , 2012 .

[48]  Spilios D. Fassois,et al.  A vibration model residual-based sequential probability ratio test framework for structural health monitoring , 2015 .

[49]  Saeed Eftekhar Azam,et al.  Damage Detection in Flexible Plates through Reduced-Order Modeling and Hybrid Particle-Kalman Filtering , 2015, Sensors.

[50]  Gang Liu,et al.  Damage assessment with state–space embedding strategy and singular value decomposition under stochastic excitation , 2014 .

[51]  Hashem Shariatmadar,et al.  An unsupervised learning approach by novel damage indices in structural health monitoring for damage localization and quantification , 2018 .

[52]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Classifying Linear and Nonlinear Structural Damage Using Frequency Domain ARX Models , 2002 .

[53]  Yimin Zhan,et al.  Robust detection of gearbox deterioration using compromised autoregressive modeling and Kolmogorov–Smirnov test statistic—Part I: Compromised autoregressive modeling with the aid of hypothesis tests and simulation analysis , 2007 .

[54]  Abbas Karamodin,et al.  A novel anomaly detection method based on adaptive Mahalanobis-squared distance and one-class kNN rule for structural health monitoring under environmental effects , 2020 .

[55]  Eleni Chatzi,et al.  Structural Health Monitoring Sensor Network Optimization through Bayesian Experimental Design , 2018, ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering.

[56]  Ruigen Yao,et al.  Autoregressive statistical pattern recognition algorithms for damage detection in civil structures , 2012 .

[57]  Qing Wang,et al.  Divergence estimation of continuous distributions based on data-dependent partitions , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[58]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Machine learning algorithms for damage detection under operational and environmental variability , 2011 .

[59]  Saeed Eftekhar Azam,et al.  Online damage detection in structural systems via dynamic inverse analysis: A recursive Bayesian approach , 2018 .

[60]  Fengshou Gu,et al.  Fault diagnosis of motor drives using stator current signal analysis based on dynamic time warping , 2013 .