Individualization as Driving Force of Clustering Phenomena in Humans

One of the most intriguing dynamics in biological systems is the emergence of clustering, in the sense that individuals self-organize into separate agglomerations in physical or behavioral space. Several theories have been developed to explain clustering in, for instance, multi-cellular organisms, ant colonies, bee hives, flocks of birds, schools of fish, and animal herds. A persistent puzzle, however, is the clustering of opinions in human populations, particularly when opinions vary continuously, such as the degree to which citizens are in favor of or against a vaccination program. Existing continuous opinion formation models predict “monoculture” in the long run, unless subsets of the population are perfectly separated from each other. Yet, social diversity is a robust empirical phenomenon, although perfect separation is hardly possible in an increasingly connected world. Considering randomness has not overcome the theoretical shortcomings so far. Small perturbations of individual opinions trigger social influence cascades that inevitably lead to monoculture, while larger noise disrupts opinion clusters and results in rampant individualism without any social structure. Our solution to the puzzle builds on recent empirical research, combining the integrative tendencies of social influence with the disintegrative effects of individualization. A key element of the new computational model is an adaptive kind of noise. We conduct computer simulation experiments demonstrating that with this kind of noise a third phase besides individualism and monoculture becomes possible, characterized by the formation of metastable clusters with diversity between and consensus within clusters. When clusters are small, individualization tendencies are too weak to prohibit a fusion of clusters. When clusters grow too large, however, individualization increases in strength, which promotes their splitting. In summary, the new model can explain cultural clustering in human societies. Strikingly, model predictions are not only robust to “noise”—randomness is actually the central mechanism that sustains pluralism and clustering.

[1]  W. Weidlich,et al.  THE STATISTICAL DESCRIPTION OF POLARIZATION PHENOMENA IN SOCIETY , 1971 .

[2]  Noah Mark,et al.  Culture and Competition: Homophily and distancing Explanations for Cultural Niches , 2003, American Sociological Review.

[3]  Roland Imhoff,et al.  What Motivates Nonconformity? Uniqueness Seeking Blocks Majority Influence , 2009, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[4]  Eric Bonabeau,et al.  Agent-based modeling: Methods and techniques for simulating human systems , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  John H. Evans,et al.  Have American's Social Attitudes Become More Polarized? , 1996, American Journal of Sociology.

[6]  C. McKean Figures , 1970, Five Long Winters.

[7]  D. Helbing,et al.  The Walking Behaviour of Pedestrian Social Groups and Its Impact on Crowd Dynamics , 2010, PloS one.

[8]  Arun Sundararajan,et al.  Distinguishing influence-based contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  R. Axelrod The Dissemination of Culture , 1997 .

[10]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[11]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[12]  Katarzyna Sznajd-Weron,et al.  Opinion evolution in closed community , 2000, cond-mat/0101130.

[13]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[14]  Y. Iwasa,et al.  Aggregation in model ecosystems. I. Perfect aggregation , 1987 .

[15]  C. Earley,et al.  Creating hybrid team cultures: An empirical test of transnational team functioning. , 2000 .

[16]  L. Amaral,et al.  The web of human sexual contacts , 2001, Nature.

[17]  Raúl Toral,et al.  Global culture: a noise-induced transition in finite systems. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[18]  T. Vicsek,et al.  Generic modelling of cooperative growth patterns in bacterial colonies , 1994, Nature.

[19]  Frances J. Milliken,et al.  Searching for Common Threads: Understanding the Multiple Effects of Diversity in Organizational Groups , 1996 .

[20]  Glynis M. Breakwell,et al.  The Distinctiveness Principle: Identity, Meaning, and the Bounds of Cultural Relativity , 2000 .

[21]  Stefan Grosskinsky Warwick,et al.  Interacting Particle Systems , 2016 .

[22]  S. Galam Heterogeneous beliefs, segregation, and extremism in the making of public opinions. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[23]  Raúl Toral,et al.  Global Culture: A Noise Induced Transition in Finite Systems , 2003 .

[24]  Matthew E. Brashears,et al.  Social Isolation in America: Changes in Core Discussion Networks over Two Decades , 2006 .

[25]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Quantifying social group evolution , 2007, Nature.

[26]  D. Thouless Introduction to Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena , 1972 .

[27]  R. Baron,et al.  Group polarization and choice‐dilemmas: how important is self‐categorization? , 2007 .

[28]  I. Couzin,et al.  Effective leadership and decision-making in animal groups on the move , 2005, Nature.

[29]  Philippa Pattison,et al.  Dynamic Social Network Modelling and Analysis , 2003 .

[30]  William G. Vanderbok The World is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century , 2005 .

[31]  Jolanda Jetten,et al.  The Individual Within the Group: Balancing the Need to Belong With the Need to Be Different , 2004, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[32]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  Tracing information flow on a global scale using Internet chain-letter data , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  Howard L. Fromkin,et al.  Uniqueness, the human pursuit of difference , 1980 .

[34]  H. Stanley,et al.  Introduction to Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena , 1972 .

[35]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Self-organized aggregation in cockroaches , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[36]  D. Murphey,et al.  The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century , 2006 .

[37]  Raul Toral,et al.  Noisy continuous-opinion dynamics , 2009, 0906.0441.

[38]  M. Fiorina,et al.  Political Polarization in the American Public , 2008 .

[39]  J. Greig,et al.  The End of Geography? , 2002 .

[40]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  Parallel extinction risk and global distribution of languages and species , 2003, Nature.

[41]  J. Gareth Polhill,et al.  Is Your Model Susceptible to Floating-Point Errors? , 2006, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[42]  B. Latané,et al.  From private attitude to public opinion: A dynamic theory of social impact. , 1990 .

[43]  G. Parisi,et al.  Interaction ruling animal collective behavior depends on topological rather than metric distance: Evidence from a field study , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[44]  H. Stanley,et al.  Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena , 2008 .

[45]  Laxmidhar Behera,et al.  On Spatial Consensus Formation: Is The Sznajd Model Different From A Voter Model? , 2003 .

[46]  Andreas Flache,et al.  How to get the timing right. A computational model of the effects of the timing of contacts on team cohesion in demographically diverse teams , 2008, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[47]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  Key Behavioural Factors in a Self-Organised Fish School Model , 2008 .

[48]  M. Newman Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[49]  G. Deffuant,et al.  An Individual‐Based Model of Innovation Diffusion Mixing Social Value and Individual Benefit1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[50]  A. Giddens,et al.  Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order , 1994 .

[51]  Harold Gulliksen,et al.  Contributions to mathematical psychology , 1964 .

[52]  E. Glaeser,et al.  Myths and Realities of American Political Geography , 2005 .

[53]  H. Stanley,et al.  Modelling urban growth patterns , 1995, Nature.

[54]  Rainer Hegselmann,et al.  Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence: models, analysis and simulation , 2002, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[55]  M. Batty The Size, Scale, and Shape of Cities , 2008, Science.

[56]  E. Durkheim Suicide: A Study in Sociology , 1897 .