Development of a Novel Instrument for Occupational Therapy of Assessment of the Physical Environment in the Home—A Methodologic Study on “The Enabler”

Occupational therapy assessment of the physical environment in the home in relation to the functional capacity of an individual is essential prior to environmental adaptations to reduce handicap. Standardized methods for research and clinical use are in great demand. To introduce and develop a new instrument for occupational therapy assessment, the novel ideogram “The Enabler” was translated into Swedish and revised. It was first tested in practice by occupational therapists in primary health care. After further revisions of “The Enabler” and pre-teaching of raters, each of 30 individuals in their home environments was assessed by two independent raters. Reliability was evaluated using the kappa statistic. After only a few lessons in advance, the raters were able to administer the assessment in practice in a reliable way, agreement between raters was very good to good, k̄ = 0.68–0.87. The Swedish revised version of “The Enabler” is a useful tool for occupational therapy home evaluation and research.

[1]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Measurement in Medicine: The Analysis of Method Comparison Studies , 1983 .

[2]  C. Granger,et al.  Interrater reliability of the 7-level functional independence measure (FIM) , 1994, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[3]  L G Branch,et al.  Physical performance measures in aging research. , 1989, Journal of gerontology.

[4]  Martin V. Faletti,et al.  Human Factors Research and Functional Environments for the Aged , 1984 .

[5]  M. Powell Lawton,et al.  Environment and aging , 1980 .

[6]  J. Cook,et al.  The use of standardized assessment in occupational therapy: the BaFPE-R as an example. , 1993, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[7]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Practical statistics for medical research , 1990 .

[8]  R L Kane,et al.  The implications of assessment. , 1993, Journal of gerontology.

[9]  A M Jette,et al.  The disablement process. , 1994, Social science & medicine.

[10]  R A Weber,et al.  A human factors analysis of ADL activities: a capability-demand approach. , 1993, Journal of gerontology.

[11]  M. Law.  Measurement in Occupational Therapy: Scientific Criteria for Evaluation , 1987 .

[12]  S. Iwarsson,et al.  Basic accessibility in modern housing--a key to the problems of care in the domestic setting. , 1993, Scandinavian journal of caring sciences.

[13]  M. Law,et al.  A critical review of scales of activities of daily living. , 1989, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[14]  Hoi K. Suen,et al.  Effects of the use of percentage agreement on behavioral observation reliabilities: A reassessment , 1985 .

[15]  B A Cooper,et al.  Barrier-free design: a review and critique of the occupational therapy perspective. , 1991, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[16]  K. J. Ottenbacher,et al.  Reliability analysis in therapeutic research: practice and procedures. , 1993, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[17]  Jacob Cohen.  A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[18]  A R Feinstein,et al.  Scientific and clinical problems in indexes of functional disability. , 1986, Annals of internal medicine.

[19]  A. Mosey.  Psychosocial Components of Occupational Therapy , 1996 .

[20]  J J Bartko,et al.  ON THE METHODS AND THEORY OF RELIABILITY , 1976, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.