Improvement of Anselme's adhesion model for evaluating human osteoblast response to peptide-grafted titanium surfaces.

Investigations on the relationships between the properties of biomaterial surfaces and cell adhesion/proliferation processes have recently gained increasing interest. To describe the behaviour of cells adhering and proliferating over different types of (and/or differently treated) substrates, some mathematical models have been also suggested in literature; these models consider both the dependence of cell adhesion/proliferation over time, and the influence of substrate morphology in allowing (or even hampering) cell attachment. Major developments in the biochemical functionalization of the materials used for the production of endosseous devices have been achieved; the ability of the so-called "biomimetic" surfaces to promote cell adhesion, thus favoring the osseointegration process, is already well acknowledged. The aim of this study was to formulate a mathematical model for osteoblast adhesion, mediated by an adhesion peptide (sequence 351-359 mapped on the Human Vitronectin Protein) covalently grafted to a titanium-based surface. To assure a highly homogenous orientation of the peptide to cells, the "specific functionalization" strategy was properly designed. Enzymatic detachment assays allowed comparing osteoblast behaviour over three differently treated titanium substrates (i.e., oxidized, silanized, and peptide-grafted), thus determining how and how much the bioactive peptide can improve the strength of cell adhesion. The results confirmed the capacity of the peptide to increase cell adhesion and adhesion strength; moreover, the role of the peptide was described by a mathematical equation characterizing cells behaviour.

[1]  J. Amédée,et al.  Effect of surface roughness of the titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V on human bone marrow cell response and on protein adsorption. , 2001, Biomaterials.

[2]  D. Puleo,et al.  Understanding and controlling the bone-implant interface. , 1999, Biomaterials.

[3]  S. Ferguson,et al.  Biomechanical comparison of the sandblasted and acid-etched and the machined and acid-etched titanium surface for dental implants. , 2002, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[4]  Maxence Bigerelle,et al.  Improvement in the morphology of Ti-based surfaces: a new process to increase in vitro human osteoblast response. , 2002, Biomaterials.

[5]  J. Brugge,et al.  Sensing the environment: a historical perspective on integrin signal transduction , 2002, Nature Cell Biology.

[6]  M. Conconi,et al.  Evaluation of silicon dioxide-based coating enriched with bioactive peptides mapped on human vitronectin and fibronectin: in vitro and in vivo assays. , 2006, Tissue engineering.

[7]  J. Nebe,et al.  The influence of surface roughness of titanium on β1- and β3-integrin adhesion and the organization of fibronectin in human osteoblastic cells , 2005 .

[8]  B. Kasemo,et al.  Surface science aspects on inorganic biomaterials , 1986 .

[9]  C. Grandi,et al.  Effect of synthetic peptides on osteoblast adhesion. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[10]  S. J. Lee Cytokine delivery and tissue engineering. , 2000, Yonsei medical journal.

[11]  M. Dettin,et al.  Novel immobilizations of an adhesion peptide on the TiO2 surface: An XPS investigation , 2007 .

[12]  M. Textor,et al.  Chemically patterned, metal oxide based surfaces produced by photolithographic techniques for studying protein- and cell-surface interactions I: Microfabrication and surface characterization. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[13]  Maxence Bigerelle,et al.  Statistical correlation between cell adhesion and proliferation on biocompatible metallic materials. , 2005, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[14]  G. Danuser,et al.  Chemically patterned, metal-oxide-based surfaces produced by photolithographic techniques for studying protein- and cell-interactions. II: Protein adsorption and early cell interactions. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[15]  A. Yamaguchi,et al.  An estrogen deficiency caused by ovariectomy increases plasma levels of systemic factors that stimulate proliferation and differentiation of osteoblasts in rats. , 1996, Endocrinology.

[16]  D. Cochran,et al.  Evaluation of an endosseous titanium implant with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface in the canine mandible: radiographic results. , 1996, Clinical oral implants research.

[17]  B. Ratner,et al.  The engineering of biomaterials exhibiting recognition and specificity , 1996, Journal of molecular recognition : JMR.

[18]  D. Landolt,et al.  Time-dependent morphology and adhesion of osteoblastic cells on titanium model surfaces featuring scale-resolved topography. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[19]  P. Brun,et al.  Human osteoblast-like cell adhesion on titanium substrates covalently functionalized with synthetic peptides. , 2007, Bone.

[20]  M. Folin,et al.  Novel osteoblast-adhesive peptides for dental/orthopedic biomaterials. , 2002, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[21]  K E Healy,et al.  Kinetics of bone cell organization and mineralization on materials with patterned surface chemistry. , 1996, Biomaterials.

[22]  B. Kasemo,et al.  Implant Surfaces and Interface Processes , 1999, Advances in dental research.

[23]  M. Conconi,et al.  Contact profilometry and correspondence analysis to correlate surface properties and cell adhesion in vitro of uncoated and coated Ti and Ti6Al4V disks. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[24]  David Boettiger,et al.  Effect of biomaterial surface properties on fibronectin–α5β1 integrin interaction and cellular attachment , 2006 .

[25]  S D Bianchi,et al.  Early loading of sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) implants: a prospective split-mouth comparative study. , 2001, Clinical oral implants research.

[26]  Maxence Bigerelle,et al.  Qualitative and quantitative study of human osteoblast adhesion on materials with various surface roughnesses. , 2000, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[27]  Lee G Luna,et al.  Manual of histologic staining methods of the Armed forces institute of pathology , 1968 .