Decision Preferences, Constraints, and Evaluation Objectives in Layout Design: A Review of Modeling Techniques

The layout design is a ubiquitous problem in engineering and design that is intrinsically knowledge-intensive, complex, vague, ill-comprehended and ill-structured. Inadequate information processing capabilities in tandem with various subjective user preferences, design constraints, and fitness objectives often hamper the acquisition of a superior solution. Consequently, the incorporation of subjective, vague, and conflicting design preferences and objectives into the layout decision process is a difficult, nevertheless, an important task. In this regard, the importance of a sound understanding of existing and promising modeling techniques cannot be overemphasized. This paper provides a review of various modeling techniques employed for explicit representation of experts’ knowledge, subjective preferences, and evaluation objectives. Moreover, it delineates a subjective classification scheme for layout decision preferences for a better appreciation of the significance of uncertain preferences, constraints, and evaluation measures in obtaining superior solutions. In addition, it reports a small-scale study regarding subjective evaluation of such modeling techniques by a group of layout design experts. Finally, we provide some recommendations regarding selection of suitable preference modeling techniques in layout design.

[1]  Efraim Turban,et al.  Decision support systems and intelligent systems , 1997 .

[2]  Farhad Azadivar,et al.  Simulation optimization with qualitative variables and structural model changes: A genetic algorithm approach , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  Kim Marriott,et al.  Cobweb: A Constraint-Based WEB Browser , 2003, ACSC.

[4]  Abdul-Rahim Ahmad,et al.  An Intelligent Decision Support System for Layout Design , 2004 .

[5]  John Wang,et al.  Facility layout optimization using simulation and genetic algorithms , 2000 .

[6]  Sadiq M. Sait,et al.  Fuzzy aggregating functions for multiobjective VLSI placement , 2002, 2002 IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence. 2002 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems. FUZZ-IEEE'02. Proceedings (Cat. No.02CH37291).

[7]  Winfried Graf,et al.  Experience in Integrating AI and Constraint Programming Methods for Automated Yellow Pages Layout , 1998, Künstliche Intell..

[8]  David S. Johnson,et al.  Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness , 1978 .

[9]  Mike Norman,et al.  Adaptive user interfaces , 1990 .

[10]  M. R. Wilhelm,et al.  A layout design heuristic employing the theory of fuzzy sets , 1987 .

[11]  Michael Negnevitsky,et al.  Artificial Intelligence: A Guide to Intelligent Systems , 2001 .

[12]  M. Bazaraa Computerized Layout Design: A Branch and Bound Approach , 1975 .

[13]  Winfried Graf,et al.  A bibliographical survey of constraint-based approaches to CAD, graphics, layout, visualization, and related topics , 1996, Knowl. Based Syst..

[14]  Otman Basir,et al.  A Placement Algorithm for Efficient Generation of Superior Decision Alternatives in Layout Design , 2004 .

[15]  Fakhri Karray,et al.  Tools of soft computing as applied to the problem of facilities layout planning , 2000, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..

[16]  A. D. Raoot,et al.  A ‘linguistic pattern’ approach for multiple criteria facility layout problems , 1993 .

[17]  Otman A. Basir,et al.  Fuzzy Inferencing in the Web Page Layout Design , 2003, WSMAI.

[18]  F. A. Meier,et al.  Application of fuzzy decision-making in facilities layout planning , 1996 .

[19]  Elwood S. Buffa,et al.  A Heuristic Algorithm and Simulation Approach to Relative Location of Facilities , 1963 .

[20]  Constantine Stephanidis,et al.  Encapsulating intelligent interactive behaviour in unified user interface artefacts , 2000, Interact. Comput..

[21]  Steve Miller,et al.  An interactive approach to facilities design using microcomputers , 1985 .