Quality of experience in UHD-1 phase 2 television: The contribution of UHD+HFR technology

A key factor to determine the quality of experience (QoE) of a video is its capability to convey the large spectrum of perceptual phenomena that our eyes can sense in real life. In order to meet this demand, the recent DVB UHD-1 Phase 2 specification employs new video features, such as higher spatial resolutions (4K/8K) and High Frame Rate (HFR). The first enables larger field of view and level of details, while the second offers sharper images of moving objects going well beyond the current frame rates. While the contribution of each of these technologies to QoE has been investigated individually, in this paper we are interested to study their interaction, and in quantifying the benefits to users from their combination. To this end, we conduct a subjective test on compressed UHD+HFR content on a recent display capable of reproducing 100 pictures per second at 2160p resolution, with the goal to assess the increase in QoE of UHD and HFR with respect to conventional video, both individually and in combination. The results indicate that for content with fast motion, at higher bitrates the combination of UHD and HFR significantly improves the QoE compared to that obtained when these features are used individually.

[1]  Manish Pindoria,et al.  Higher Frame Rates for Television , 2014 .

[2]  Andrew B. Watson,et al.  The pyramid of visibility , 2016, HVEI.

[3]  Gary J. Sullivan,et al.  Overview of the High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) Standard , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[4]  Katy C. Noland,et al.  The Application of Sampling Theory to Television Frame Rate Requirements , 2014 .

[5]  Jeff B. Pelz,et al.  Spatio-velocity CSF as a function of retinal velocity using unstabilized stimuli , 2006, Electronic Imaging.

[6]  Bernd Girod,et al.  Content Adaptive Representations of Omnidirectional Videos for Cinematic Virtual Reality , 2015, ImmersiveME@ACM Multimedia.

[7]  Masaki Emoto,et al.  High-Frame-Rate Motion Picture Quality and Its Independence of Viewing Distance , 2014, Journal of Display Technology.

[8]  Touradj Ebrahimi,et al.  JPEG Pleno: Toward an Efficient Representation of Visual Reality , 2016, IEEE MultiMedia.

[9]  Touradj Ebrahimi,et al.  Subjective and objective evaluation of HDR video compression , 2015 .

[10]  Yoshihiko Kuroki,et al.  A psychophysical study of improvements in motion‐image quality by using high frame rates , 2007 .

[11]  The present state of ultra-high definition television , 2012 .

[12]  Sugato Chakravarty,et al.  Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures , 1995 .

[13]  Peter G. J. Barten,et al.  Contrast sensitivity of the human eye and its e ects on image quality , 1999 .

[14]  Patrick Le Callet,et al.  High Dynamic Range Video - From Acquisition, to Display and Applications , 2016 .