Partial mass isolation system for seismic vibration control of buildings

Summary In a previous study, the authors studied a partial mass isolation (PMI) system that through isolating different portions of story masses can provide a building with multiple inherent vibration suppressors. It was shown that the PMI strategy with isolated mass ratios (IMRs) of 0.05 or 0.90 could perform as effectively as an equivalent tuned mass damper or a base isolation system, respectively. In the present paper, the PMI system is examined in structural models with different fundamental periods. PMI configurations in a wide IMR range of (0.05:0.025:0.90) are optimized illustrating that applying an IMR of 0.25–0.50 can provide an efficient system, simultaneously satisfying the constraints related to different performance objectives (i.e., mitigating the overall building seismic responses and controlling isolated components' (ICs) responses while integrating these components into the building architecture). Simulation results reveal that using identical ICs at different stories, which have the advantage of facilitating the design and construction of the system, can lead to a near-optimal solution. It is also demonstrated that in terms of the spatial distribution of ICs, an adequate seismic performance improvement can be achieved by allocating ICs only at a subset of upper stories (e.g., top half stories), which can further simplify the PMI systems' construction.

[1]  John B. Mander,et al.  Innovative seismic retrofitting strategy of added stories isolation system , 2013 .

[2]  M. H. El Naggar,et al.  On the performance of SCF in seismic isolation of the interior equipment of buildings , 2007 .

[3]  Alessandro De Stefano,et al.  Seismic performance of pendulum and translational roof-garden TMDs , 2009 .

[4]  G. B. Warburton,et al.  Optimum absorber parameters for various combinations of response and excitation parameters , 1982 .

[5]  Mansour Ziyaeifar,et al.  Partial mass isolation in tall buildings , 1998 .

[6]  Christoph Adam,et al.  Evaluation and analytical approximation of Tuned MassDamper performance in an earthquake environment , 2012 .

[7]  Akira Nishitani,et al.  Optimum design of tuned mass damper floor system integrated into bending‐shear type building based on H∞, H2, and stability maximization criteria , 2015 .

[8]  Yozo Fujino,et al.  Optimal tuned mass damper for seismic applications and practical design formulas , 2008 .

[9]  Salvatore Perno,et al.  Dynamic response and optimal design of structures with large mass ratio TMD , 2012 .

[10]  Erik A. Johnson,et al.  "SMART" BASE ISOLATION SYSTEMS , 2000 .

[11]  Maria Q. Feng,et al.  Design of a mega-sub-controlled building system under stochastic wind loads , 1997 .

[12]  Roberto Villaverde,et al.  Aseismic Roof Isolation System: Feasibility Study with 13-Story Building , 2002 .

[13]  Katsuhide Murakami,et al.  Middle-Story Isolated Structural System of High-Rise Building , 2009 .

[14]  Gordon P. Warn,et al.  Seismic Performance and Sensitivity of Floor Isolation Systems in Steel Plate Shear Wall Structures , 2012 .

[15]  Alexandros A. Taflanidis,et al.  Reliability-based assessment/design of floor isolation systems , 2014 .

[16]  Liming Zhang,et al.  Slide roof system for dynamic response reduction , 2008 .

[17]  Gilberto Mosqueda,et al.  Aseismic roof isolation system: analytic and shake table studies , 1999 .

[18]  Akira Nishitani,et al.  Seismic vibration control of building structures with multiple tuned mass damper floors integrated , 2014 .

[19]  Lyan-Ywan Lu,et al.  Polynomial friction pendulum isolators (PFPIs) for building floor isolation: An experimental and theoretical study , 2013 .

[20]  Wilfred D. Iwan,et al.  The earthquake design and analysis of equipment isolation systems , 1978 .

[21]  Jiju Antony,et al.  Quality engineering of a traction alternator by robust design , 2010 .