A hybrid multi-fidelity approach to the optimal design of warm forming processes using a knowledge-based artificial neural network

In this paper, a hybrid multi-fidelity optimization approach based on a knowledge-based artificial neural network (KBNN) was used to determine the optimal heating strategy in warm forming processes. First, a less costly, but less accurate isothermal finite element analysis (FEA), which neglected the complex heat transfer between the part and tooling elements, was performed to obtain overall knowledge about the effect of temperature on forming performance. Then, a small number of more accurate and expensive (i.e., longer computational time) non-isothermal FEA results were utilized in an artificial neural network (ANN), along with the prior knowledge from the isothermal FEA, to improve the accuracy in defining the non-linear relationship between the design variables (i.e., regional temperatures on the tooling) and the response (i.e., part depth value before failure). The accuracy of the non-isothermal FEA was validated by comparing its prediction results to the experimental findings. This approach was demonstrated for forming a rectangular cup, where it offered a rapid and accurate recommendation of the optimal temperature distribution on the tooling elements for improved formability. The individual and interaction effects of the regional temperatures on formability were also evaluated in detail by constructing the response surfaces near the optimal design point using the multi-fidelity system developed. Finally, a comparison of the temperature and thickness strain distributions on the formed parts was made under various operating conditions, to acquire detailed information on the deformation characteristics of the material.

[1]  Timothy Masters,et al.  Practical neural network recipes in C , 1993 .

[2]  Raphael T. Haftka,et al.  Variable-complexity aerodynamic optimization of a high-speed civil transport wing , 1994 .

[3]  Masao Kikuchi,et al.  Formability of Al-Mg Alloy at Warm Temperature , 2000 .

[4]  Amit K. Ghosh,et al.  Tensile deformation behavior of aluminum alloys at warm forming temperatures , 2003 .

[5]  Ken-ichiro Mori,et al.  Finite element simulation of warm deep drawing of aluminium alloy sheet when accounting for heat conduction , 2002 .

[6]  Andy J. Keane,et al.  A Knowledge-Based Approach To Response Surface Modelling in Multifidelity Optimization , 2003, J. Glob. Optim..

[7]  Kuldip Gupta,et al.  EM-ANN models for via interconnects in microstrip circuits , 1996, 1996 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest.

[8]  Carlos Alberto Conceição António,et al.  Metal-forming process optimisation by inverse evolutionary search , 2002 .

[9]  E. Doege,et al.  Sheet metal forming of magnesium wrought alloys — formability and process technology , 2001 .

[10]  Jean-Loup Chenot,et al.  OPTIMAL DESIGN FOR NON-STEADY-STATE METAL FORMING PROCESSES. II: APPLICATION OF SHAPE OPTIMIZATION IN FORGING , 1996 .

[11]  Robert A. Ayres,et al.  Alloying aluminum with magnesium for ductility at warm temperatures (25 to 250°C) , 1979 .

[12]  Taylan Altan,et al.  Finite element simulation of magnesium alloy sheet forming at elevated temperatures , 2004 .

[13]  R. Haftka Combining global and local approximations , 1991 .

[14]  Amit K. Ghosh,et al.  Biaxial warm forming behavior of aluminum sheet alloys , 2003 .

[15]  Jun Ni,et al.  Finite Element Modeling and Analysis of Warm Forming of Aluminum Alloys—Validation Through Comparisons With Experiments and Determination of a Failure Criterion , 2006 .

[16]  Jean-Loup Chenot,et al.  OPTIMAL DESIGN FOR NON‐STEADY‐STATE METAL FORMING PROCESSES—I. SHAPE OPTIMIZATION METHOD , 1996 .

[17]  R. Pearce,et al.  Warm forming of aluminium/magnesium alloy sheet☆ , 1978 .

[18]  K. Narasimhan,et al.  A Hybrid Intelligent Systems Approach for Die Design in Sheet Metal Forming , 2000 .

[19]  Jun Ni,et al.  Determination of appropriate temperature distribution for warm forming of aluminum alloys , 2004 .