A review of the GGP network and scientific challenges (Invited)

The Global Geodynamics Project (GGP) started on July 1, 1997 and is now in its 11th year of operation. It has a relatively small number of stations (24), compared to seismic (GSN) or geodetic (GPS) networks, but it is the only database that is accumulating relative gravity measurements worldwide. As any scientific organization matures, there is a change in the culture of the project and the people involved. To remain viable, it is necessary not only to maintain the original goals, but also to incorporate new ideas and applications on the science involved. The main challenges within GGP are to ensure: (a) that the instruments are properly calibrated, (b) that data is being recorded with the highest accuracy, and with appropriate hydrological instrumentation, and (c) that the flow of data from all recording stations to the ICET database continues as agreed in within the GGP framework. These practical matters are the basis for providing high quality recordings that will extend the usefulness of the network into the future to meet new challenges in geosciences. Several new stations have been brought into operation in the past few years, but the data availability from some of these stations still leaves room for improvement. Nevertheless, the core group of stations established more than 10 years ago has been able to maintain the high standards of the original concept, and much research has been published using network data in areas as diverse as hydrology, polar motion, and Earth’s normal modes. GGP will also participate in some of the scientific tasks of the Global Geodetic Observing System program, at least initially by providing relative gravity measurements for collocation with other high precision geodetic measurements.

[1]  S. Rosat,et al.  Analysis of a 10-year (1997–2007) record of time-varying gravity in Strasbourg using absolute and superconducting gravimeters: New results on the calibration and comparison with GPS height changes and hydrology , 2009 .

[2]  R. Herrmann,et al.  Amplitude and Q of 0S0 from the Sumatra Earthquake as Recorded on Superconducting Gravimeters and Seismometers , 2008 .

[3]  M. Bilker‐Koivula,et al.  Comparison of superconducting gravimeter observations with hydrological models of various spatial extents , 2011 .

[4]  P. Tregoning,et al.  Dynamic planet : monitoring and understanding a dynamic planet with geodetic and oceanographic tools : IAG symposium, Cairns, Australia, 22-26 August 2005 , 2006 .

[5]  J. Boy,et al.  Status of the GGP Satellite Project , 2009 .

[6]  R. Falk,et al.  Precise Gravity Time Series and Instrumental Properties from Combination of Superconducting and Absolute Gravity Measurements , 2009 .

[7]  David Crossley,et al.  Report of GGP Activities to Commission 3, Completing 10 Years for the Worldwide Network of Superconducting Gravimeters , 2009 .

[8]  J. Hinderer,et al.  GGP (Global Geodynamics Project): An International Network of Superconducting Gravimeters to Study Time-Variable Gravity , 2010 .

[9]  Luis A. Rivera,et al.  Connecting a Quanterra Data Logger Q330 on the GWR C021 Superconducting Gravimeter for low Frequency Seismology , 2008 .

[10]  C. Reigber,et al.  Combination of temporal gravity variations resulting from superconducting gravimeter (SG) recordings, GRACE satellite observations and global hydrology models , 2006 .

[11]  Rudolf Widmer-Schnidrig,et al.  What Can Superconducting Gravimeters Contribute to Normal-Mode Seismology? , 2003 .

[12]  E. Williams,et al.  The Apache Point Observatory Lunar Laser-ranging Operation: Instrument Description and First Detections , 2007, 0710.0890.

[13]  Accurate transfer function determination for superconducting gravimeters , 2000 .

[14]  S. Bonvalot,et al.  AGrav—The New International Absolute Gravity Database of BGI and BKG and its benefit for the Global Geodynamics Project (GGP) , 2009 .

[16]  J. Lemoine,et al.  The GHYRAF (Gravity and Hydrology in Africa) experiment: Description and first results , 2009 .

[17]  O. Andersen,et al.  Seasonal changes in the European gravity field from GRACE: A comparison with superconducting gravimeters and hydrology model predictions , 2006 .

[18]  Jacques Hinderer,et al.  The Contribution of GGP Superconducting Gravimeters to GGOS , 2009 .

[19]  J. Boy,et al.  Three Year Comparison Between a Superconducting Gravimeter (GWR C026) and an Absolute Gravimeter (FG5#206) in Strasbourg (France) , 2001 .

[20]  Hans-Peter Plag GGOS and it User Requirements, Linkage and Outreach , 2007 .

[21]  T. Jahr,et al.  Hydrological experiments around the superconducting gravimeter at Moxa Observatory , 2006 .

[22]  T. Baker,et al.  An estimate of the errors in gravity ocean tide loading computations , 2005 .

[23]  F. Bryan,et al.  Time variability of the Earth's gravity field: Hydrological and oceanic effects and their possible detection using GRACE , 1998 .

[24]  Hyuck-Jin Park,et al.  Analysis of Superconducting Gravimeter measurements at MunGyung station, Korea , 2009 .

[25]  B. Richter,et al.  The Frankfurt calibration system for relative gravimeters , 1995 .

[26]  O. Francis,et al.  Calibration of a superconducting gravimeter by comparison with an absolute gravimeter FG5 in Boulder , 1998 .