How will regulation influence commercial viability of autonomous equipment in US production agriculture?

Autonomous equipment for crop production is on the brink of commercialization in the United States but federal, state, and local policies could affect commercial viability and hinder adoption. This article examines the farm-level implications of both a speed restriction and on-site supervisory regulations. The rules reduce the profitability of autonomous machinery, and for some scenarios autonomous machines are no longer an economically viable alternative to conventional machinery. Regulations also increase the optimal number autonomous machines required and influence production practices. Smaller farms have more flexibility in supporting the rules because they have more to gain from the use of autonomous equipment.

[1]  R. Godwin,et al.  Economics of autonomous equipment for arable farms , 2021, Precision Agriculture.

[2]  J. McPhee,et al.  Managing soil compaction – A choice of low-mass autonomous vehicles or controlled traffic? , 2020 .

[3]  Peter W. B. Phillips,et al.  Farming Reimagined: A case study of autonomous farm equipment and creating an innovation opportunity space for broadacre smart farming , 2019, NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences.

[4]  S. Blackmore,et al.  Economics of robots and automation in field crop production , 2019, Precision Agriculture.

[5]  Senthold Asseng,et al.  Future farms without farmers , 2019, Science Robotics.

[6]  S. Shearer,et al.  An economic feasibility assessment of autonomous field machinery in grain crop production , 2019, Precision Agriculture.

[7]  Anthony King,et al.  Technology: The Future of Agriculture , 2017, Nature.

[8]  Margot Brereton,et al.  Bringing the Farmer Perspective to Agricultural Robots , 2015, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[9]  Timothy S. Stombaugh,et al.  A Whole Farm Analysis of the Influence of Auto-Steer Navigation on Net Returns, Risk, and Production Practices , 2011, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.

[10]  S. Fountas,et al.  Agricultural robots—system analysis and economic feasibility , 2006, Precision Agriculture.

[11]  Spyros Fountas,et al.  Systems Requirements for a Small Autonomous Tractor , 2004 .

[12]  J. Canham,et al.  A matter of life or death. , 1985, Nursing times.

[13]  Santosh K. Pitla,et al.  A CASE STUDY CONCERNING THE EFFECTS OF CONTROLLER RESPONSE AND TURNING MOVEMENTS ON APPLICATION RATE UNIFORMITY WITH A SELF―PROPELLED SPRAYER , 2011 .