Assessing the Role of Age, Education, Gender and Income on the Digital Divide: Evidence for the European Union

This paper assesses the digital divide between and within the 28 member-states of the European Union. The analysis comprised four socio-demographic contexts: age, education, gender, and income. Because of the digital divide’s complexity, a multivariate approach was applied - factor analysis with oblique rotation, which resulted in two distinct dimensions: e-Services and Social Networks. To test the significant differences of European Union positioning and European Union disparities, Multivariate Analysis of Variance and Squared Rank Test were computed. Findings show that e-Services adoption is influenced primarily by the education level of individuals, while Social Networks adoption is more affected by individuals’ age.

[1]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[2]  R. Rummel Applied Factor Analysis , 1970 .

[3]  W. J. Conover,et al.  Practical Nonparametric Statistics , 1972 .

[4]  Subhash Sharma Applied multivariate techniques , 1995 .

[5]  F. Webster Theories of the Information Society , 2015 .

[6]  D. Campbell Can the digital divide be contained , 2001 .

[7]  M. Prensky Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants , 2001 .

[8]  M. Prensky Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1 , 2001 .

[9]  D. Iacobucci Methodological and statistical concerns of the experimental behavioral researcher , 2001 .

[10]  Franci Pivec The global information technology report 2003–2004 , 2003 .

[11]  David J. Gunkel Second Thoughts: Toward a Critique of the Digital Divide , 2003, New Media Soc..

[12]  Mark Warschauer,et al.  Dissecting the "Digital Divide": A Case Study in Egypt , 2003, Inf. Soc..

[13]  N. Selwyn The information aged: A qualitative study of older adults' use of information and communications technology , 2004 .

[14]  Boyan Jovanovic,et al.  General Purpose Technologies , 2005 .

[15]  Frederick J. Riggins,et al.  The Digital Divide: Current and Future Research Directions , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[16]  J. Cooper,et al.  The digital divide: the special case of gender , 2006, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[17]  María Rosalía Vicente,et al.  Patterns of ICT diffusion across the European Union , 2006 .

[18]  Y. Enoch,et al.  Age, gender, ethnicity and the digital divide: university students’ use of web‐based instruction , 2006 .

[19]  Ana Jesús López Menéndez,et al.  A multivariate framework for the analysis of the digital divide: Evidence for the European Union-15 , 2006, Inf. Manag..

[20]  J. V. Dijk Digital divide research, achievements and shortcomings , 2006 .

[21]  A. Hasan,et al.  Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development , 2007 .

[22]  N. Bostrom Technological revolutions: ethics and policy in the dark , 2007 .

[23]  Lukas H. Meyer,et al.  Summary for policymakers , 2007 .

[24]  H. Milner,et al.  Bridging the Digital Divide. , 2008 .

[25]  Erman Coşkun,et al.  Analyzing digital divide within and between member and candidate countries o f European Union , 2009, Gov. Inf. Q..

[26]  Louis Leung,et al.  User-generated content on the internet: an examination of gratifications, civic engagement and psychological empowerment , 2009, New Media Soc..

[27]  E. Hargittai,et al.  Digital Distinction: Status-Specific Types of Internet Usage , 2009 .

[28]  Arthur D. Fisk,et al.  Older adults talk technology: Technology usage and attitudes , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[29]  M. Hilbert,et al.  When is Cheap, Cheap Enough to Bridge the Digital Divide? Modeling Income Related Structural Challenges of Technology Diffusion in Latin America , 2010 .

[30]  N. Selwyn Degrees of Digital Division: Reconsidering Digital Inequalities and Contemporary Higher Education , 2010 .

[31]  Christos Michalakelis,et al.  Digital divide gap convergence in Europe , 2011 .

[32]  Martin Hilbert,et al.  The end justifies the definition: The manifold outlooks on the digital divide and their practical usefulness for policy-making , 2011 .

[33]  Liangzhi Yu,et al.  The divided views of the information and digital divides: A call for integrative theories of information inequality , 2011, J. Inf. Sci..

[34]  T. Kelly,et al.  Information and communications for development 2012 : maximizing mobile , 2012 .

[35]  Chei Sian Lee,et al.  News sharing in social media: The effect of gratifications and prior experience , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[36]  Tiago Oliveira,et al.  Digital divide across the European Union , 2012, Inf. Manag..

[37]  Alice Lesnick Dr. Students on Computers and Learning , 2012 .

[38]  J. V. Dijk The Evolution of the Digital Divide - The Digital Divide Turns to Inequality of Skills and Usage , 2012 .

[39]  M. Marr,et al.  The digital divide in Europe , 2013 .

[40]  S. Taipale The use of e-government services and the Internet: The role of socio-demographic, economic and geographical predictors , 2013 .

[41]  M. Reddy,et al.  Computer usage and access in low-income urban communities , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[42]  Xiaoqun Zhang Income disparity and digital divide: The Internet Consumption Model and cross-country empirical research , 2013 .

[43]  Muhlis Özdemir,et al.  Measuring Domestic Digital Divide by Using Latent Class Analysis: A Case Study of Turkey , 2014 .

[44]  Albert D. Ritzhaupt,et al.  Differences in Student Information and Communication Technology Literacy Based on Socio-Economic Status, Ethnicity, and Gender , 2013 .

[45]  David Tuffley,et al.  The Gender Digital Divide in Developing Countries , 2014, Future Internet.

[46]  Sonia Ballano,et al.  Young users and the digital divide: readers, participants or creators on Internet? , 1970, Communication & Society.

[47]  Eric Fang,et al.  Is Neutral Really Neutral? The Effects of Neutral User-Generated Content on Product Sales , 2014 .

[48]  Anabel Quan-Haase,et al.  Revisiting the digital divide in Canada: the impact of demographic factors on access to the internet, level of online activity, and social networking site usage , 2014 .

[49]  Benjamin Grosser,et al.  What Do Metrics Want? How Quantification Prescribes Social Interaction on Facebook , 2014 .

[50]  Su‐Jung Nam,et al.  An analysis of the digital literacy of people with disabilities in Korea: verification of a moderating effect of gender, education and age , 2014 .

[51]  Teresa Correa,et al.  Gendered Space: The Digital Divide between Male and Female Users in Internet Public Access Sites , 2014, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[52]  Y. Wong,et al.  Digital Divide Challenges of Children in Low-Income Families: The Case of Shanghai , 2015 .

[53]  J. Pick,et al.  Digital divides in the world and its regions: A spatial and multivariate analysis of technological utilization , 2015 .

[54]  Alexander van Deursen,et al.  Increasing inequalities in what we do online: A longitudinal cross sectional analysis of Internet activities among the Dutch population (2010 to 2013) over gender, age, education, and income , 2015, Telematics Informatics.

[55]  David J. Atkin,et al.  Ethnicity, digital divides and uses of the Internet for health information , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[56]  Seung-Rok Park,et al.  Club convergence and factors of digital divide across countries , 2015 .

[57]  Gustavo S. Mesch,et al.  Digital inequalities and why they matter , 2015 .

[58]  Laura Robinson,et al.  Where we've been and where we are going , 2015 .

[59]  Sajay Arthanat,et al.  "Who over 65 is online?" Older adults' dispositions toward information communication technology , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[60]  Thomas N Friemel,et al.  The digital divide has grown old: Determinants of a digital divide among seniors , 2016, New Media Soc..

[61]  Victor I. Chang,et al.  Multimedia augmented m-learning: Issues, trends and open challenges , 2016, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[62]  Wonseok Oh,et al.  Mobile App Analytics: A Multiple Discrete-Continuous Choice Framework , 2016, MIS Q..

[63]  N. Ellison,et al.  Mapping the two levels of digital divide: Internet access and social network site adoption among older adults in the USA , 2016 .

[64]  Y. Igarashi Distributional effects of hiring through networks , 2016 .

[65]  Uwe Deichmann,et al.  World development report 2016: Digital dividends , 2016 .

[66]  Carlos Duarte,et al.  A literature survey on older adults' use of social network services and social applications , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[67]  Anabel Quan-Haase,et al.  Interviews with digital seniors: ICT use in the context of everyday life , 2016 .

[68]  Chuang-Chun Liu Understanding player behavior in online games: The role of gender , 2016 .

[69]  Fernando Bação,et al.  The education-related digital divide: An analysis for the EU-28 , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[70]  Teresa Correa Digital skills and social media use: how Internet skills are related to different types of Facebook use among ‘digital natives’ , 2016 .

[71]  Marika Lüders,et al.  Being old in an always-on culture: Older people's perceptions and experiences of online communication , 2017, Inf. Soc..

[72]  Benoit Aubert,et al.  The impact of initial learning experience on digital services usage diffusion: A field study of e-services in Lebanon , 2017, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[73]  Nadine Mumporeze,et al.  Gender digital divide in Rwanda: A qualitative analysis of socioeconomic factors , 2017, Telematics Informatics.

[74]  Bm Bert Sadowski,et al.  Advanced users and the adoption of high speed broadband: results of a living lab study in the Netherlands , 2017 .

[75]  M. Nishijima,et al.  Evolution and determinants of digital divide in Brazil (2005–2013) , 2017 .

[76]  Pekka Räsänen,et al.  Between class and status? Examining the digital divide in Finland, the United Kingdom, and Greece , 2017, Inf. Soc..

[77]  Tiago Oliveira,et al.  Assessing the pattern between economic and digital development of countries , 2016, Information Systems Frontiers.

[78]  Tae-Eung Sung,et al.  Forecasting by analogy using the web search traffic , 2017 .

[79]  C. Last,et al.  Global Commons in the Global Brain , 2020, World-Systems Evolution and Global Futures.

[80]  Vikas Kumar,et al.  Mobile phone adoption in agri-food sector: Are farmers in Sub-Saharan Africa connected? , 2017, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[81]  V. Kathuria,et al.  ICT access: Testing for convergence across countries , 2018, Inf. Soc..

[82]  Kami Richmond,et al.  ICT and income inequality: a cross-national perspective , 2018 .