Obviously sequential, but continuous or staged? Refits and cognition in three late paleolithic assemblages from Japan

Abstract The cognitive basis of technological behavior is of major interest in modern archaeology, although addressing ancient cognition in objective, material terms is difficult. Since refitted portions of lithic debris found together reflect the work done at one sitting, patterns of refitted material expose the cognitive basis of lithic technology by showing how stoneworkers structured their efforts. Analysis of assemblages of refitted materials from three Late Paleolithic Japanese sites—Iwato, Isoyama, and Mosanru—shows that although stoneworking was highly patterned and could proceed as a smooth continuum, stoneworkers regularly made use of convenient interruption points to divide the reduction sequence. Analysis also shows that diversity existed within patterns of production and suggests that established archaeological models that focus on highly patterned sequential activities may not expose the diversity that existed in the execution of technological activities.

[1]  Colin Renfrew,et al.  The Ancient Mind: Elements of Cognitive Archaeology , 1997 .

[2]  A.Colin Renfrew,et al.  Problems in the modelling of socio-cultural systems , 1987 .

[3]  A. Byers,et al.  Intentionality, Symbolic Pragmatics, and Material Culture: Revisiting Binford’s View of the Old Copper Complex , 1999, American Antiquity.

[4]  B CollinsMichael,et al.  Lithic Technology as a Means of Processual Inference , 1975 .

[5]  Michael B. Schiffer,et al.  Archaeological Method and Theory , 1991 .

[6]  Marcia-Anne Dobres,et al.  Technology and Social Agency: Outlining a Practice Framework for Archaeology , 1991 .

[7]  Philip G. Chase Symbols and paleolithic artifacts: Style, standardization, and the imposition of arbitrary form , 1991 .

[8]  James M. Skibo,et al.  The Explanation of Artifact Variability , 1997, American Antiquity.

[9]  Michael J. Shott Stage Versus Continuum in the Debris Assemblage from Production of A Fluted Biface , 1996 .

[10]  Mary Lou Larson,et al.  A nontypological approach to debitage analysis , 1989 .

[11]  L. Raab Debitage Graphs and Archaic Settlement Patterns in the Arkansas Ozarks , 1979 .

[12]  G. Odell Prehistoric Hafting and Mobility in the North American Midcontinent: Examples from Illinois , 1994 .

[13]  Earl Herbert Swanson,et al.  Lithic technology: Making and using stone tools , 1975 .

[14]  P. Lemonnier The study of material culture today: toward an anthropology of technical systems , 1986 .

[15]  P. Bleed Operations Research and Archaeology , 1991, American Antiquity.

[16]  Payson Sheets,et al.  Time, Energy, and Stone Tools , 1990 .

[17]  Michael Shott,et al.  Size and form in the analysis of flake debris: Review and recent approaches , 1994 .

[18]  Pierre Lemonnier,et al.  Elements for an Anthropology of Technology , 1992 .

[19]  L. Binford Human ancestors: Changing views of their behavior , 1985 .

[20]  H. Dibble The Interpretation of Middle Paleolithic Scraper Morphology , 1987, American Antiquity.

[21]  Jay K. Johnson,et al.  The Organization Of Core Technology , 1987 .

[22]  S. Mithen From domain specific to generalized intelligence: a cognitive interpretation of the Middle/Upper Palaeolithic transition , 1994 .

[23]  J. Morrow Clovis projectile point manufacture : a perspective from the Ready/Lincoln Hills Site, 11JY46, Jersey County, Illinois , 1995 .

[24]  Tony Buzan Make the most of your mind , 1977 .

[25]  A. Close,et al.  Reconstructing Movement in Prehistory , 2000 .

[26]  Colin Potts,et al.  Design of Everyday Things , 1988 .

[27]  T. Wynn Two Developments in the Mind of Early Homo , 1993 .

[28]  D. Stahle,et al.  An analysis and application of the size distribution of waste flakes from the manufacture of bifacial stone tools , 1982 .

[29]  G. Frison The Casper site : a Hell Gap bison kill on the high plains , 1974 .

[30]  C. Karlin,et al.  The ancient mind: Prehistoric technology: a cognitive science? , 1994 .

[31]  Charles M. Keller,et al.  Cognition and Tool Use: The Blacksmith at Work , 1996 .

[32]  A. Sullivan,et al.  Debitage Analysis and Archaeological Interpretation , 1985, American Antiquity.

[33]  Leroy D. McDermott The Prehistory of the Mind: The Cognitive Origins of Art, Religion and Science , 1997, American Antiquity.

[34]  B. Bradley,et al.  Folsom Tools and Technology at the Hanson Site, Wyoming , 1980 .

[35]  Robert L. Kelly,et al.  Coming into the Country: Early Paleoindian Hunting and Mobility , 1988, American Antiquity.

[36]  Peter Bleed,et al.  Trees or Chains, Links or Branches: Conceptual Alternatives for Consideration of Stone Tool Production and Other Sequential Activities , 2001 .

[37]  Peter Bleed Risk and Cost in Japanese Microcore Technology , 1996 .