Experimental investigation of galloping piezoelectric energy harvesters with square bluff bodies

In this paper, both a baseline galloping piezoelectric energy harvester (GPEH) with a square bluff body and an improved GPEH with an impact bump stop are tested in a wind tunnel in order to determine the system damping, electrical response and limit cycle oscillation (LCO) amplitude. In the baseline GPEH, harvested voltage, LCO amplitude and damping ratio vary with wind velocity and electrical load. They all increase with increasing wind velocity under the same electrical load. Under each wind velocity, the damping ratio increases from the short circuit load, reaches a peak value at the electrical load resulting in a maximum voltage, and reduces the value at the open circuit load. The LCO amplitude shows the opposite trend compared to the damping case. It decreases as the electrical resistance load increases and reaches the minimum value when the damping ratio is highest. A resistance load of 100 kΩ yields a maximum peak power output. The impact stop is introduced to reduce bending stresses and improve the fatigue life of the baseline GPEH. The performance of the improved GPEH depends on the stop design parameters such as gap size, stop location and contact area. Comprehensive tests were conducted to investigate the effect of each parameter on the performance of the improved GPEH and an optimal bump stop configuration was determined. Compared to the expected proportional reduction in both electrical and structural responses, a maximum 70% reduction in LCO amplitude and only a maximum 20% reduction in harvested voltage are achieved in our optimal improved GPEH. The time variable and motion dependent aerodynamic forces acting on the bluff body could contribute to this. In summary, comprehensive experimental evaluations were conducted to characterize the performance of both baseline GPEHs and improved GPEHs. The baseline GPEH service life can be significantly improved by incorporating an impact bump stop. The improved GPEH design provides a practical solution to harvest electricity from wind-induced vibration.

[1]  Daniel J. Inman,et al.  On the energy harvesting potential of piezoaeroelastic systems , 2010 .

[2]  Gang Wang,et al.  Performance of galloping piezoelectric energy harvesters , 2014 .

[3]  Paul K. Wright,et al.  A piezoelectric vibration based generator for wireless electronics , 2004 .

[4]  Muhammad R. Hajj,et al.  Piezoelectric energy harvesting from vortex-induced vibrations of circular cylinder , 2013 .

[5]  D. Inman,et al.  A Review of Power Harvesting from Vibration using Piezoelectric Materials , 2004 .

[6]  J. Kim,et al.  Charge injection from gate electrode by simultaneous stress of optical and electrical biases in HfInZnO amorphous oxide thin film transistor , 2010 .

[7]  Ali H. Nayfeh,et al.  Power harvesting from transverse galloping of square cylinder , 2012 .

[8]  Paul Muralt,et al.  Ferroelectric thin films for micro-sensors and actuators: a review , 2000 .

[9]  Atanas A. Popov,et al.  Performance of a cantilever piezoelectric energy harvester impacting a bump stop , 2011 .

[10]  Neil D. Sims,et al.  Energy harvesting from the nonlinear oscillations of magnetic levitation , 2009 .

[11]  J. Sirohi,et al.  Fundamental Understanding of Piezoelectric Strain Sensors , 1999, Smart Structures.

[12]  Daniel J. Inman,et al.  Piezoaeroelastic Modeling and Analysis of a Generator Wing with Continuous and Segmented Electrodes , 2010 .

[13]  Daniel J. Inman,et al.  Estimation of Electric Charge Output for Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting , 2004 .

[14]  Jayant Sirohi,et al.  Piezoelectric wind energy harvester for low-power sensors , 2011 .

[15]  G. V. Parkinson,et al.  THE SQUARE PRISM AS AN AEROELASTIC NON-LINEAR OSCILLATOR , 1964 .

[16]  Hod Lipson,et al.  Ambient wind energy harvesting using cross-flow fluttering , 2011 .

[17]  Soon-Duck Kwon,et al.  A T-shaped piezoelectric cantilever for fluid energy harvesting , 2010 .

[18]  Muhammad R. Hajj,et al.  Phenomena and modeling of piezoelectric energy harvesting from freely oscillating cylinders , 2012 .

[19]  Matthew Bryant,et al.  Modeling and Testing of a Novel Aeroelastic Flutter Energy Harvester , 2011 .

[20]  Daniel J. Inman,et al.  Towards autonomous sensing , 2006, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[21]  A. Barrero-Gil,et al.  Hysteresis in transverse galloping: The role of the inflection points , 2009 .

[22]  M. Novak.  Aeroelastic Galloping of Prismatic Bodies , 1969 .

[23]  Daniel J. Inman,et al.  Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting , 2011 .

[24]  Gang Wang,et al.  Analysis of bimorph piezoelectric beam energy harvesters using Timoshenko and Euler–Bernoulli beam theory , 2013 .

[25]  Yiannis Andreopoulos,et al.  The performance of a self-excited fluidic energy harvester , 2012 .

[26]  D. Inman,et al.  Nonlinear piezoelectricity in electroelastic energy harvesters: Modeling and experimental identification , 2010 .

[27]  Jayant Sirohi,et al.  Harvesting Wind Energy Using a Galloping Piezoelectric Beam , 2012 .

[28]  J. Liu,et al.  The investigation of point defect modes of phononic crystal for high Q resonance , 2011, 2011 16th International Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems Conference.

[29]  Yaowen Yang,et al.  Small Wind Energy Harvesting From Galloping Using Piezoelectric Materials , 2012 .