Pre-Deployment Testing, Augmentation and Calibration of Cross-Sensitive Sensors

Over the past few years, many low-cost pollution sensors have been integrated into measurement platforms for air quality monitoring. However, using these sensors is challenging: concentrations of toxic substances in ambient air often lie at sensors' sensitivity boundaries, environmental conditions affect the sensor measurements, and the sensors often suffer from poor selectivity, i.e. are cross-sensitive to multiple pollutants. Datasheet information on these effects is scarce or may not cover deployment conditions. Consequently the sensors need to undergo extensive pre-deployment testing to examine their feasibility for a given application and to find the optimal measurement setup that allows accurate data collection and calibration. In this work, we propose a novel method to conduct in-field testing of low-cost sensors. The algorithm proposed is based on multiple least-squares and leverages the physical variation of urban air pollution to quantify the amount of explained and unexplained sensor signal. We verify (i) whether a sensor is feasible for air quality monitoring in a given environment and underpin our analysis with positive and negative examples of sensors available on the market, (ii) model sensor cross-sensitivities to interfering gases and environmental effects and (iii) compute the optimal sensor array and its calibration parameters for stable and accurate sensor measurements over long time periods in a given environment. Finally, we provide an experimental evaluation of our approach using over 9 million measurements of various low-cost sensors collected in an urban area. Based on the results from our testing methodology we propose an optimized sensor array setup. Further, we show---compared to a state-of-the-art calibration technique---a significantly lower calibration error with better long-time stability of the calibration parameters.

[1]  E. Massera,et al.  On field calibration of an electronic nose for benzene estimation in an urban pollution monitoring scenario , 2008 .

[2]  Emiliano Miluzzo,et al.  CaliBree: A Self-calibration System for Mobile Sensor Networks , 2008, DCOSS.

[3]  M. Morsi A Microcontroller Based on Multi Sensors Data Fusion and Artificial Intelligent Technique for Gas Identification , 2007, IECON 2007 - 33rd Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society.

[4]  Lothar Thiele,et al.  On-the-Fly Calibration of Low-Cost Gas Sensors , 2012, EWSN.

[5]  Miguel Martin,et al.  Study of the interferences of NO2 and CO in solid state commercial sensors , 1999 .

[6]  I. Morsi Electronic noses for monitoring environmental pollution and building regression model , 2008, 2008 34th Annual Conference of IEEE Industrial Electronics.

[7]  K. Brudzewski,et al.  Gas analysis system composed of a solid-state sensor array and hybrid neural network structure , 1999 .

[8]  Allison Woodruff,et al.  A vehicle for research: using street sweepers to explore the landscape of environmental community action , 2009, CHI.

[9]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Rapid Deployment with Confidence: Calibration and Fault Detection in Environmental Sensor Networks , 2006 .

[10]  Wolfgang Gpel,et al.  Multi‐Component Analysis in Chemical Sensing , 2008 .

[11]  吴德恒,et al.  经Co , 1964 .

[12]  H. Ishida,et al.  Gas sensor network for air-pollution monitoring , 2005 .

[13]  Manuel Aleixandre,et al.  Calibration of a cluster of low-cost sensors for the measurement of air pollution in ambient air , 2014, IEEE SENSORS 2014 Proceedings.

[14]  Tadeusz Pustelny,et al.  Multivariate Analysis in Gas Sensing Applications , 2008 .

[15]  Zhijun Li,et al.  AirCloud: a cloud-based air-quality monitoring system for everyone , 2014, SenSys.

[16]  S. Laurent,et al.  Report of laboratory and in-situ validation of micro-sensor for monitoring ambient air - Ozone micro-sensors, αSense, model B4 O3 sensors , 2014 .

[17]  George W. Kling,et al.  Performance of a low-cost methane sensor for ambient concentration measurements in preliminary studies , 2012 .

[18]  Mansour Kabganian,et al.  Neural network calibration of a semiconductor metal oxide micro smell sensor , 2010, 2010 Symposium on Design Test Integration and Packaging of MEMS/MOEMS (DTIP).

[19]  Boi Faltings,et al.  Sensing the Air We Breathe - The OpenSense Zurich Dataset , 2021, AAAI.

[20]  Josep Peñuelas,et al.  Temporal patterns of surface ozone levels in different habitats of the North Western Mediterranean basin , 2004 .

[21]  Taeyoung Kim,et al.  Characterizing and minimizing synchronization and calibration errors in inertial body sensor networks , 2010, BODYNETS.

[22]  Gb Stewart,et al.  The use of electrochemical sensors for monitoring urban air quality in low-cost, high-density networks , 2013 .

[23]  C. Pijolat,et al.  Calibration of a multivariate gas sensing device for atmospheric pollution measurement , 2006 .

[24]  René Lalauze,et al.  Gas detection for automotive pollution control , 1999 .

[25]  L. Shang,et al.  The next generation of low-cost personal air quality sensors for quantitative exposure monitoring , 2014 .

[26]  L. Balzano,et al.  Blind Calibration of Sensor Networks , 2007, 2007 6th International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks.

[27]  L. Spinelle,et al.  Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical Field calibration of a cluster of low-cost available sensors for air quality monitoring. Part A: Ozone and nitrogen dioxide (cid:2) , 2022 .

[28]  Lothar Thiele,et al.  Reducing multi-hop calibration errors in large-scale mobile sensor networks , 2015, IPSN.

[29]  Joseph R. Stetter,et al.  Effect of air humidity on gas response of SnO2 thin film ozone sensors , 2007 .

[30]  S. D. Vito,et al.  CO, NO2 and NOx urban pollution monitoring with on-field calibrated electronic nose by automatic bayesian regularization , 2009 .

[31]  R. Bro Multivariate calibration: What is in chemometrics for the analytical chemist? , 2003 .

[32]  Lothar Thiele,et al.  Pushing the spatio-temporal resolution limit of urban air pollution maps , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom).

[33]  Hermann Kaufmann,et al.  A Comparison of Feature-Based MLR and PLS Regression Techniques for the Prediction of Three Soil Constituents in a Degraded South African Ecosystem , 2012 .

[34]  Giuliano Martinelli,et al.  Environmental monitoring field tests using screen-printed thick-film sensors based on semiconducting oxides , 2000 .

[35]  Gregory P. Harmer,et al.  Semiconducting metal oxide sensor array for the selective detection of combustion gases , 2003 .

[36]  J. Bring How to Standardize Regression Coefficients , 1994 .

[37]  Wolfgang Göpel,et al.  Multi‐Component Analysis in Chemical Sensing , 2008 .