Intelligent Meaning Creation in a Clumpy World Helps Communication

This article investigates the problem of how language learners decipher what words mean. In many recent models of language evolution, agents are provided with innate meanings a priori and explicitly transfer them to each other as part of the communication process. By contrast, I investigate how successful communication systems can emerge without innate or transferable meanings, and show that this is dependent on the agents developing highly synchronized conceptual systems. I present experiments with various cognitive, communicative, and environmental factors which affect the likelihood of agents achieving meaning synchronization and demonstrate that an intelligent meaning creation strategy in a clumpy world leads to the highest level of meaning similarity between agents.

[1]  Willard Van Orman Quine,et al.  Word and Object , 1960 .

[2]  S. Potter,et al.  Universals of Language , 1966 .

[3]  W. Stolz.  Universals of Language. , 1968 .

[4]  J. Macnamara.  Cognitive basis of language learning in infants. , 1972, Psychological review.

[5]  R. A. Groeneveld,et al.  Practical Nonparametric Statistics (2nd ed). , 1981 .

[6]  Eve V. Clark,et al.  The principle of contrast: A constraint on language acquisition. , 1987 .

[7]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  The importance of shape in early lexical learning , 1988 .

[8]  E. Markman,et al.  Children's use of mutual exclusivity to constrain the meanings of words , 1988, Cognitive Psychology.

[9]  Ellen M. Markman,et al.  Categorization and Naming in Children: Problems of Induction , 1989 .

[10]  S. Pinker,et al.  Natural language and natural selection , 1990, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[11]  R. Horton.  Rules and representations , 1993, The Lancet.

[12]  L. Steels.  Perceptually grounded meaning creation , 1996 .

[13]  Michael Oliphant,et al.  Learning and the Emergence of Coordinated Communication , 1997 .

[14]  Takaya Arita,et al.  Evolution of Linguistic Diversity in a Simple Communication System , 1998, Artificial Life.

[15]  Simon Kirby,et al.  Function, Selection, and Innateness: The Emergence of Language Universals , 1999 .

[16]  Luc Steels,et al.  Bootstrapping grounded word semantics , 1999 .

[17]  P. Bloom.  How children learn the meanings of words , 2000 .

[18]  David J. Groggel,et al.  Practical Nonparametric Statistics , 2000, Technometrics.

[19]  Chrystopher L. Nehaniv.  The making of meaning in societies: semiotic and information-theoretic background to the evolution of communication , 2000 .

[20]  Andrew D. M. Smith,et al.  Establishing Communication Systems without Explicit Meaning Transmission , 2001, ECAL.

[21]  C. Borror.  Practical Nonparametric Statistics, 3rd Ed. , 2001 .

[22]  S. Levinson,et al.  Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development , 2001 .

[23]  S. Levinson.  Covariation between spatial language and cognition, and its implications for language learning , 2001 .

[24]  Simon Kirby,et al.  Linguistic Evolution Through Language Acquisition: Learning, bottlenecks and the evolution of recursive syntax , 2002 .

[25]  Kenneth Smith.  Compositionality from culture: the role of environment structure and learning bias , 2002 .

[26]  J. Batali.  Linguistic Evolution Through Language Acquisition: The negotiation and acquisition of recursive grammars as a result of competition among exemplars , 2002 .

[27]  Henry Brighton,et al.  Compositional Syntax From Cultural Transmission , 2002, Artificial Life.

[28]  Ted Briscoe,et al.  Linguistic Evolution through Language Acquisition: Formal and Computational Models. , 2002 .