Inside Theory-Aware and Standards-Compliant Authoring System

In their paper [14], Bourdeau and Mizoguchi foresaw a framework for ontology-based intelligent systems. Although it took longer years than their expectation, the ontology they have been developing is now released for evaluation with the help of the second author. Ontology building is a labor-intensive process and it is rarely perfect. Our enterprise is not an exception. The current ontology is still very preliminary because it has been completely reconstructed from the existing one with a few new ideas. So, we hope the readers be generous when they read the ontology. The ontology presented here is not a light-weight ontology but a heavyweight ontology. It is built based on philosophical consideration of all the concepts necessary for understanding learning, instruction and instructional design. Although it is full of axioms, the Hozo GUI which is based on a frame structure makes it easier to read it. However, the readers are expected to have basic knowledge of ontology and preferably be aware of the theory of role and of the Hozo way of role representation. Papers [6][7] would be helpful to grasp what we are doing with this ontology. The prototype system named SMARTIES is a totally ontology-aware system which fully utilizes the merits of ontology computationally as well as conceptually. It is so preliminary that it cannot be open to public, though you can get a rough idea of what it is from the papers.

[1]  C. Reigeluth Instructional Design: What Is It and Why Is It? , 1983 .

[2]  Charles M. Reigeluth,et al.  Instructional Design Theories and Models : An Overview of Their Current Status , 1983 .

[3]  Yusuke Hayashi,et al.  Ontological Support for a Theory-Eclectic Approach to Instructional and Learning Design , 2006, EC-TEL.

[4]  Jacqueline Bourdeau,et al.  Making Learning Design Standards Work with an Ontology of Educational Theories , 2005, AIED.

[5]  James O. Carey,et al.  The systematic design of instruction , 1978 .

[6]  Charles M. Reigeluth,et al.  Instructional-design Theories and Models : A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory, Volume II , 1999 .

[7]  L. Resnick,et al.  Knowing, Learning, and Instruction , 2018 .

[8]  Jacqueline Bourdeau,et al.  Using Ontological Engineering to Overcome Common AI-ED Problems , 2000 .

[9]  Susan E. Newman,et al.  Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the Craft of Reading, Writing, and Mathematics. Technical Report No. 403. , 1987 .

[10]  Mitsuru Ikeda,et al.  Hozo: An Environment for Building/Using Ontologies Based on a Fundamental Consideration of "Role" and "Relationship" , 2002, EKAW.

[11]  Charles M. Reigeluth Instructional theories in action : lessons illustrating selected theories and models , 2009 .

[12]  A. Lejeune IMS Learning Design , 2004 .

[13]  Peggy A. Ertmer,et al.  Behaviorism, Cognitivism, Constructivism: Comparing Critical Features From an Instructional Design Perspective , 2008 .

[14]  Yusuke Hayashi,et al.  Ontological Modeling Approach to Blending Theories for Instructional and Learning Design , 2006, ICCE.

[15]  Jacqueline Bourdeau,et al.  Collaborative Ontological Engineering of Instructional Design Knowledge for an ITS Authoring Environment , 2002, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[16]  Leslie J. Briggs,et al.  Principles of Instructional Design , 1974 .

[17]  Tom Murray,et al.  Authoring tools for advanced technology learning environments : toward cost-effective adaptive, interactive and intelligent educational software , 2003 .

[18]  J. Keller,et al.  An application of the ARCS Model of Motivational Design. , 1987 .