Visual discrimination of objects differing in spatial depth by goldfish

Training experiments were performed to investigate the ability of goldfish to discriminate objects differing in spatial depth. Tests on size constancy should give insight into the mechanisms of distance estimation. Goldfish were successfully trained to discriminate between two black disk stimuli of equal size but different distance from the tank wall. Each stimulus was presented in a white tube so that the fish could see only one stimulus at a time. For each of eight training stimulus distances, the just noticeable difference in distance was determined at a threshold criterion of 70% choice frequency. The ratio of the retinal image sizes between training stimulus and comparison stimulus at threshold was about constant. However, in contrast to Douglas et al. (Behav Brain Res 30:37–42, 1988), goldfish did not show size constancy in tests with stimuli of the same visual angle. This indicates that they did not estimate distance, but simply compared the retinal images under our experimental conditions. We did not find any indication for the use of accommodation as a depth cue. A patterned background at the rear end of the tubes did not have any effect, which, however, does not exclude the possibility that motion parallax is used as a depth cue under natural conditions.

[1]  R. L. Valois,et al.  Contrast Sensitivity and Acuity , 1991 .

[2]  J. Sivak,et al.  The Naturally Occurring Accommodative Response of the Oscar, Astronotus ocellatus, to Visual Stimuli , 1996, Vision Research.

[3]  H. Spekreijse,et al.  Separate processing of “color” and “brightness” in goldfish , 1991, Vision Research.

[4]  C. A. Dvorak,et al.  Contrast sensitivity and acuity of the goldfish , 1979, Vision Research.

[5]  E. C. Sobel The locust's use of motion parallax to measure distance , 1990, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[6]  F. Schaeffel,et al.  Accommodation behaviour during prey capture in the vietnamese leaf turtle (Geoemyda spengleri) , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[7]  Stefan Schuster,et al.  Template-matching describes visual pattern-recognition tasks in the weakly electric fish Gnathonemus petersii. , 2002, The Journal of experimental biology.

[8]  Karl Kral,et al.  Behavioural–analytical studies of the role of head movements in depth perception in insects, birds and mammals , 2003, Behavioural Processes.

[9]  Hiroaki Sorniya,et al.  Studies on the Visual Accommodation in Fishes , 1973 .

[10]  T. S. Collett,et al.  Landmark learning in bees , 1983, Journal of comparative physiology.

[11]  T. S. Collett,et al.  Accommodation in anuran Amphibia and its role in depth vision , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[12]  L Maler,et al.  Blurring of the senses: common cues for distance perception in diverse sensory systems , 2002, Neuroscience.

[13]  K. Kral Perspectives on the role of head movements in depth perception , 2003, Behavioural Processes.

[14]  H. Howland,et al.  Accommodation in the northern rock bass (Ambloplites rupestris rupestris) in response to natural stimuli. , 1973, Vision research.

[15]  J. Pettigrew,et al.  Prey capture and accommodation in the sandlance, Limnichthyes fasciatus (Creediidae; Teleostei) , 2000, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[16]  ’ K.POWERS,et al.  DEPTH OF FOCUS, EYE SIZE AND VISUAL ACUITY , 2002 .

[17]  K. Herter,et al.  Die Fischdressuren und Ihre Sinnesphysiologischen Grundlagen , 1954 .

[18]  J. Ewert,et al.  Ontogenetic aspects on visual "size-constancy" phenomena in the midwife toad Alytes obstetricans (Laur.). , 1979, Brain, behavior and evolution.

[19]  C. Neumeyer Wavelength dependence of visual acuity in goldfish , 2003, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[20]  R. Wehner,et al.  Visual spatial memory in desert ants,Cataglyphis bicolor (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) , 1979, Experientia.

[21]  M. Ott,et al.  Visual accommodation in vertebrates: mechanisms, physiological response and stimuli , 2006, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[22]  J. Pettigrew,et al.  Terrestrial optics in an aquatic eye: The sandlance, Limnichthytes fasciatus (Creediidae, Teleostei) , 1995, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[23]  A. Meesters Über die Organisation des Gesichtsfeldes der Fische , 2010 .

[24]  D. Ingle Visual Releasers of Prey-Catching Behavior in Frogs and Toads , 1968 .

[25]  Stefan Schuster,et al.  Archer Fish Learn to Compensate for Complex Optical Distortions to Determine the Absolute Size of Their Aerial Prey , 2004, Current Biology.

[26]  Howard C. Howland,et al.  Infrared photoretinoscope. , 1987, Applied optics.

[27]  T. Collett Stereopsis in toads , 1977, Nature.

[28]  W. Kirmse,et al.  Binocular vision and accommodation in prey-catching chameleons , 1998, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[29]  Christa Neumeyer,et al.  On spectral sensitivity in the goldfish Evidence for neural interactions between different “cone mechanisms” , 1984, Vision Research.

[30]  W. C. Sherbrooke,et al.  Prey snapping and visual distance estimation in Texas horned lizards, Phrynosoma cornutum , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[31]  R. Olberg,et al.  Prey size selection and distance estimation in foraging adult dragonflies , 2005, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[32]  W N Charman,et al.  Accommodation as a Function of Object Form , 1978, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[33]  R. Douglas,et al.  Size constancy in goldfish (Carassius auratus) , 1988, Behavioural Brain Research.