Comparison of thematic maps using symbolic entropy

Comparison of thematic maps is an important task in a number of disciplines. Map comparison has traditionally been conducted using cell-by-cell agreement indicators. More recently, other methods have been proposed that take into account not only spatially coincident cells in two maps, but also their surroundings or the spatial structure of their differences. The objective of this article is to propose a framework for map comparison that considers (1) the patterns of spatial association in two maps, in other words, the map elements in their surroundings; (2) the equivalence of those patterns; and (3) the independence of patterns between maps. Two new statistics for the spatial analysis of qualitative data are introduced that are based on the symbolic entropy of the maps. As well, all inferential elements to conduct hypothesis testing are developed. The framework is illustrated using real and simulated maps.

[1]  A. Cohen.  An Introduction to Probability Theory and Mathematical Statistics , 1979 .

[2]  Robert H. Gardner,et al.  Neutral Models: Useful Tools for Understanding Landscape Patterns , 1997 .

[3]  Stephen E. Fienberg,et al.  Testing Statistical Hypotheses , 2005 .

[4]  Antonio Páez,et al.  Exploring Contextual Variations in Land Use and Transport Analysis Using a Probit Model with Geographical Weights , 2006 .

[5]  Alex Hagen,et al.  Fuzzy set approach to assessing similarity of categorical maps , 2003, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[6]  Tarmo K. Remmel,et al.  Investigating Global and Local Categorical Map Configuration Comparisons Based on Coincidence Matrices , 2009 .

[7]  A. Stewart Fotheringham,et al.  Local Forms of Spatial Analysis , 2010 .

[8]  Scott J. Goetz,et al.  Analysis of scale dependencies in an urban land‐use‐change model , 2005, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[9]  Pierre Goovaerts,et al.  Propagating error in land-cover-change analyses: impact of temporal dependence under increased thematic complexity , 2010, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[10]  Hal Caswell,et al.  Community Structure: A Neutral Model Analysis , 1976 .

[11]  Mark Rounsevell,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article International Journal of Geographical Information Science Exploring Spatial Data Uncertainties in Land-use Change Scenarios Exploring Spatial Data Uncertainties in Land-use Change Scenarios , 2022 .

[12]  Li Zhang,et al.  Spatiotemporal analysis of rural–urban land conversion , 2009, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[13]  Michael A. Wulder,et al.  Map comparison using spatial autocorrelation: an example using AVHRR derived land cover of Canada , 2004 .

[14]  Alex Hagen-Zanker,et al.  Map comparison methods that simultaneously address overlap and structure , 2006, J. Geogr. Syst..

[15]  Kurt H. Riitters,et al.  Landscape pattern metrics and regional assessment , 1999 .

[16]  Emiliano Ferreira Castejon,et al.  Using neural networks and cellular automata for modelling intra‐urban land‐use dynamics , 2008, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[17]  J. Mas.  Monitoring land-cover changes: A comparison of change detection techniques , 1999 .

[18]  Raja Chakir,et al.  Determinants of land use changes: A spatial multinomial probit approach , 2007 .

[19]  Manuel Ruiz,et al.  Measuring Ethnic Clustering and Exposure with the Q Statistic: An Exploratory Analysis of Irish, Germans, and Yankees in 1880 Newark , 2012, Annals of the Association of American Geographers. Association of American Geographers.

[20]  Tobias Schreck,et al.  Using space–time visual analytic methods for exploring the dynamics of ethnic groups' residential patterns , 2010, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[21]  Alex Hagen-Zanker,et al.  An improved Fuzzy Kappa statistic that accounts for spatial autocorrelation , 2009, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[22]  Manuel Ruiz,et al.  Testing for spatial association of qualitative data using symbolic dynamics , 2010, J. Geogr. Syst..

[23]  Russell G. Congalton,et al.  A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data , 1991 .

[24]  G. Foody.  Thematic map comparison: Evaluating the statistical significance of differences in classification accuracy , 2004 .

[25]  Marie-Josée Fortin,et al.  SPATIAL ANALYSIS OF LANDSCAPES: CONCEPTS AND STATISTICS , 2005 .

[26]  R. Congalton.  Using spatial autocorrelation analysis to explore the errors in maps generated from remotely sensed data , 1988 .

[27]  Alessandro De Pinto,et al.  Investigating the predictive capabilities of discrete choice models in the presence of spatial effects , 2009 .

[28]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  Application of the dynamic spatial ordered probit model , 2009 .

[29]  Duane F. Marble,et al.  Spatial Analysis: A Reader in Statistical Geography , 1968 .

[30]  Alexandra D. Syphard,et al.  Assessing housing growth when census boundaries change , 2009, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[31]  Barry Boots,et al.  Categorical maps, comparisons, and confidence , 2006, J. Geogr. Syst..

[32]  M. Turner.  Landscape ecology: what is the state of the science? , 2005 .

[33]  Bryan C. Pijanowski,et al.  Calibrating a neural network‐based urban change model for two metropolitan areas of the Upper Midwest of the United States , 2005, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[34]  Inge Uljee,et al.  Further developments of a fuzzy set map comparison approach , 2005, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[35]  Spario Y. T. Soon.  BINOMIAL APPROXIMATION FOR DEPENDENT INDICATORS , 1996 .

[36]  R. G. Pontius,et al.  Detecting important categorical land changes while accounting for persistence , 2004 .

[37]  Arika Ligmann-Zielinska,et al.  Applying time-dependent variance-based global sensitivity analysis to represent the dynamics of an agent-based model of land use change , 2010, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[38]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment , 2002 .

[39]  William Rand,et al.  Path dependence and the validation of agent‐based spatial models of land use , 2005, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[40]  M. Kuhnert,et al.  Comparing Raster Map Comparison Algorithms for Spatial Modeling and Analysis , 2005 .

[41]  Roger White,et al.  Hierarchical fuzzy pattern matching for the regional comparison of land use maps , 2001, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[42]  Eric J. Gustafson,et al.  Quantifying Landscape Spatial Pattern: What Is the State of the Art? , 1998, Ecosystems.

[43]  S. V. Stehman,et al.  Comparing thematic maps based on map value , 1999 .

[44]  J. Ord,et al.  Spatial Processes: Models and Applications , 1984 .