Motor Contagion during Human-Human and Human-Robot Interaction

Motor resonance mechanisms are known to affect humans' ability to interact with others, yielding the kind of “mutual understanding” that is the basis of social interaction. However, it remains unclear how the partner's action features combine or compete to promote or prevent motor resonance during interaction. To clarify this point, the present study tested whether and how the nature of the visual stimulus and the properties of the observed actions influence observer's motor response, being motor contagion one of the behavioral manifestations of motor resonance. Participants observed a humanoid robot and a human agent move their hands into a pre-specified final position or put an object into a container at various velocities. Their movements, both in the object- and non-object- directed conditions, were characterized by either a smooth/curvilinear or a jerky/segmented trajectory. These trajectories were covered with biological or non-biological kinematics (the latter only by the humanoid robot). After action observation, participants were requested to either reach the indicated final position or to transport a similar object into another container. Results showed that motor contagion appeared for both the interactive partner except when the humanoid robot violated the biological laws of motion. These findings suggest that the observer may transiently match his/her own motor repertoire to that of the observed agent. This matching might mediate the activation of motor resonance, and modulate the spontaneity and the pleasantness of the interaction, whatever the nature of the communication partner.

[1]  G. Sandini,et al.  Robots can be perceived as goal-oriented agents , 2013 .

[2]  Hermann J. Müller,et al.  Does Observing Artificial Robotic Systems Influence Human Perceptual Processing in the Same Way as Observing Humans? , 2012, ICSR.

[3]  T. Pozzo,et al.  Motor resonance mechanisms are preserved in Alzheimer’s disease patients , 2012, Neuroscience.

[4]  Emily S. Cross,et al.  Robotic movement preferentially engages the action observation network , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[5]  Umberto Castiello,et al.  Motor cortex excitability is tightly coupled to observed movements , 2012, Neuropsychologia.

[6]  Giulio Sandini,et al.  Measuring Human-Robot Interaction Through Motor Resonance , 2012, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[7]  Frank Broz,et al.  Gaze in HRI: From modeling to communication , 2012, 2012 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[8]  Umberto Castiello,et al.  Grasping with tools: corticospinal excitability reflects observed hand movements. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[9]  E Poliakoff,et al.  How does visuomotor priming differ for biological and non-biological stimuli? A review of the evidence , 2012, Psychological Research.

[10]  Umberto Castiello,et al.  Corticospinal excitability modulation to hand muscles during the observation of appropriate versus inappropriate actions , 2011, Cognitive neuroscience.

[11]  Clare Press,et al.  Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews Action Observation and Robotic Agents: Learning and Anthropomorphism , 2022 .

[12]  V. Manera,et al.  Cooperation or competition? Discriminating between social intentions by observing prehensile movements , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  N. Sebanz,et al.  Psychological research on joint action: Theory and data , 2011 .

[14]  C. Heyes Automatic imitation. , 2011, Psychological bulletin.

[15]  Alois Knoll,et al.  Biological movement increases acceptance of humanoid robots as human partners in motor interaction , 2011, AI & SOCIETY.

[16]  L. Fadiga,et al.  Automatic versus Voluntary Motor Imitation: Effect of Visual Context and Stimulus Velocity , 2010, PloS one.

[17]  Giulio Sandini,et al.  The iCub humanoid robot: An open-systems platform for research in cognitive development , 2010, Neural Networks.

[18]  U. Castiello,et al.  Modulation of the action control system by social intention: unexpected social requests override preplanned action. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  G. Cheng,et al.  Social cognitive neuroscience and humanoid robotics , 2009, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[20]  Katsumi Watanabe,et al.  Behavioral speed contagion: Automatic modulation of movement timing by observation of body movements , 2008, Cognition.

[21]  A. Schnitzler,et al.  Do simple intransitive finger movements consistently activate frontoparietal mirror neuron areas in humans? , 2007, NeuroImage.

[22]  Vilayanur S. Ramachandran,et al.  EEG evidence for mirror neuron activity during the observation of human and robot actions: Toward an analysis of the human qualities of interactive robots , 2007, Neurocomputing.

[23]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Evidence for a distributed hierarchy of action representation in the brain. , 2007, Human movement science.

[24]  A. Hamilton,et al.  Interference effect of observed human movement on action is due to velocity profile of biological motion , 2007, Social neuroscience.

[25]  Christian Keysers,et al.  The anthropomorphic brain: The mirror neuron system responds to human and robotic actions , 2007, NeuroImage.

[26]  M. Shiffrar,et al.  Fitts's Law Holds for Action Perception , 2007, Psychological science.

[27]  T. Pozzo,et al.  Kinematic features of movement tunes perception and action coupling , 2006, Behavioural Brain Research.

[28]  C. Heyes,et al.  Robotic movement elicits automatic imitation. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[29]  Uta Frith,et al.  Theory of mind , 2001, Current Biology.

[30]  R. Rumiati,et al.  The strategic control of multiple routes in imitation of actions. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The mirror-neuron system. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[32]  U. Castiello,et al.  The Human Premotor Cortex Is 'Mirror' Only for Biological Actions , 2004, Current Biology.

[33]  A. van Knippenberg,et al.  Mimicry and Prosocial Behavior , 2004, Psychological science.

[34]  T. Chartrand,et al.  Using Nonconscious Behavioral Mimicry to Create Affiliation and Rapport , 2003, Psychological science.

[35]  U. Castiello Understanding other people's actions: intention and attention. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  H. Bekkering,et al.  Action generation and action perception in imitation: an instance of the ideomotor principle. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[37]  Y. Paulignan,et al.  An Interference Effect of Observed Biological Movement on Action , 2003, Current Biology.

[38]  C. Frith,et al.  Functional imaging of ‘theory of mind’ , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[39]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Observing a human or a robotic hand grasping an object: Differential motor priming effects , 2002 .

[40]  W. Prinz,et al.  Movement observation affects movement execution in a simple response task. , 2001, Acta psychologica.

[41]  H. Bekkering,et al.  Imitation of gestures in children is goal-directed. , 2000, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[42]  C. Frith,et al.  Reading the mind in cartoons and stories: an fMRI study of ‘theory of mind’ in verbal and nonverbal tasks , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[43]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. , 1999, Science.

[44]  T. Chartrand,et al.  The chameleon effect: the perception-behavior link and social interaction. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[45]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Resonance behaviors and mirror neurons. , 1999, Archives italiennes de biologie.

[46]  A. Premack,et al.  Infants Attribute Value to the Goal-Directed Actions of Self-propelled Objects , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[47]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Action recognition in the premotor cortex. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[48]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[49]  A. Karmiloff-Smith,et al.  Are children with autism blind to the mentalistic significance of the eyes , 1995 .