Reducing conflicts in groupware: Metafunctions and their empirical evaluation

Certain functions in groupware affect more than one user who might have conflicting interests. To describe conflicts arising from the use of groupware functions, we distinguish the roles of the activator and the user affected. As technical means to lessen these conflicts, we develop two metafunctions: visibility of use and negotiability. We expect that these metafunctions reduce role-based conflicts and lead to higher acceptance of groupware-systems among users. To examine these hypotheses we performed an empirical study in six different organizations. Using scenarios to present different design options to users, we confirmed most of our assumptions. Implications of these findings for the design of groupware are discussed.

[1]  Helge Kahler.  Von der Empirie zur Gestaltungsanforderung - Beispiele für die Bedeutung explorativer Empirie bei der Entwicklung von Gestaltungsanforderungen für Groupware , 1993, Menschengerechte Groupware.

[2]  Volker Wulf,et al.  The Ambivalence of Network Visibility in an Organizational Context , 1993, NetWORKing.

[3]  Markus Rohde.  Evaluationsstudie zum Konzept gestufter Metafunktionen , 1993, Menschengerechte Groupware.

[4]  Volker Wulf.  Negotiability: A Metafunction to Support Personalizable Groupware , 1993, HCI.

[5]  Terry Winograd,et al.  A Language/Action Perspective on the Design of Cooperative Work , 1987, SGCH.

[6]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces , 1992, CSCW '92.

[7]  Winfried Hacker,et al.  Arbeitspsychologie : psychische Regulation von Arbeitstätigkeiten , 1986 .

[8]  Murray Turoff,et al.  The TEIES design and objectives: computer mediated communications and tailorability , 1989, [1989] Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Volume III: Decision Support and Knowledge Based Systems Track.

[9]  Randall H. Trigg,et al.  Adaptability and Tailorability in NoteCards , 1987 .

[10]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Culture and Control in a Media Space , 1993, ECSCW.

[11]  R. Lenz,et al.  Cooperative problem solving using database conversations , 1994, Proceedings of 1994 IEEE 10th International Conference on Data Engineering.

[12]  Simon M. Kaplan,et al.  Flexible, active support for collaborative work with ConversationBuilder , 1992, CSCW '92.

[13]  Ramana Rao,et al.  Semi-structured messages are surprisingly useful for computer-supported coordination , 1986, CSCW '86.

[14]  Christopher Fry,et al.  Experiments with Oval: a radically tailorable tool for cooperative work , 1992, CSCW '92.

[15]  Markus Rohde,et al.  Der Szenariobogen - Herleitung und Evaluation software-ergonomischer Gestaltungsanforderungen , 1993, Menschengerechte Groupware.

[16]  Austin Henderson,et al.  There's No Place Like Home: Continuing Design in Use , 1992, Design at Work.

[17]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Iterative design of video communication systems , 1992, CSCW '92.

[18]  Saul Greenberg.  Personalisable Groupware: Accommodating Individual Roles and Group Differences , 1991, ECSCW.

[19]  Markus Rohde.  The scenarionnaire empirical evaluation of software-ergonomical requirements for groupware , 1995 .

[20]  Volker Wulf,et al.  Konfliktmanagement bei Groupware , 1997 .

[21]  WinogradTerry.  A language/action perspective on the design of cooperative work , 1987 .

[22]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Realizing a video environment: EuroPARC's RAVE system , 1992, CHI.

[23]  Kjeld Schmidt,et al.  Riding a Tiger, or Computer Supported Cooperative Work , 1991, ECSCW.

[24]  Abigail Sellen,et al.  Design for Privacy in Ubiquitous Computing Environments , 1993, ECSCW.

[25]  Volker Wulf.  Negotiability: a metafunction to tailor access to data in groupware , 1995, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[26]  S.D.P. Harker,et al.  The development of ISO DIS 9241 Part 2: visual display terminals (VDTs) used for office tasks-ergonomic requirements. 2. Task requirements , 1989 .

[27]  Thomas Herrmann,et al.  Workflow management systems: ensuring organizational flexibility by possibilities of adaptation and negotiation , 1995, COCS '95.

[28]  S. Easterbrook,et al.  A Survey of Empirical Studies of Conflict , 1993 .