About renegades and outgroup-haters: Modelling the link between social influence and intergroup attitudes

Polarization between groups is a major topic of contemporary societal debate and research. Formal models of opinion dynamics try to explain how intergroup polarization arises from simple first principles of social interaction. In existing models, intergroup attitudes affect social influence in the form of homophily or xenophobia, fixed tendencies of individuals to be more open to influence from ingroup members or distance themselves from attitudes of outgroup members. These models generate polarization between groups, but they neglect a central insight from empirical research. Intergroup attitudes are themselves subject to social influence in interactions with both in- and outgroup members. A model is proposed in which the attitude which is subject to social influence is also an intergroup attitude. It affects in turn the influence process itself. Furthermore, it is shown how this changes model predictions about process and conditions of polarization between groups. More complex patterns of intergroup relations emerge than in a model with fixed xenophobia. Especially, a renegade minority (‘outgroup lovers’) is found to have a key role in avoiding mutually negative intergroup relations and even elicit reversed polarization, resulting in a majority of individuals developing a negative attitude towards their ingroup and a positive one for the outgroup.

[1]  Frank Schweitzer,et al.  Coexistence of Social Norms Based on in- and Out-Group Interactions , 2007, Adv. Complex Syst..

[2]  A. Flache,et al.  Extended intergroup friendships within social settings: The moderating role of initial outgroup attitudes , 2013 .

[3]  Guillaume Deffuant,et al.  Models of Social Influence: Towards the Next Frontiers , 2017, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[4]  Sameer B. Srivastava,et al.  Pulling Closer and Moving Apart , 2015 .

[5]  Floriana Gargiulo,et al.  Opinion dynamics in a group-based society , 2010 .

[6]  John H. Evans Have Americans' Attitudes Become More Polarized?—An Update* , 2003 .

[7]  S. Feld Social Structural Determinants of Similarity among Associates , 1982 .

[8]  M. Macy,et al.  Agent based modelling: social order from the bottom up , 2009 .

[9]  P. Bourdieu Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste* , 2018, Food and Culture.

[10]  Andreas Flache,et al.  How to get the timing right. A computational model of the effects of the timing of contacts on team cohesion in demographically diverse teams , 2008, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[11]  Miles Hewstone,et al.  Reducing intergroup bias through intergroup contact: Twenty years of progress and future directions , 2017 .

[12]  Steffen Eger,et al.  Opinion dynamics and wisdom under out-group discrimination , 2013, Math. Soc. Sci..

[13]  J. Phinney,et al.  Positive intergroup attitudes: The role of ethnic identity , 2007 .

[14]  Thomas F. Pettigrew,et al.  When Groups Meet: The Dynamics of Intergroup Contact , 2011 .

[15]  David Lee,et al.  Biased assimilation, homophily, and the dynamics of polarization , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  Rainer Hegselmann,et al.  Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence: models, analysis and simulation , 2002, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[17]  P. Scheepers,et al.  Ethnic composition of school classes, majority-minority friendships, and adolescents' intergroup attitudes in the Netherlands. , 2011, Journal of adolescence.

[18]  Tobias H. Stark,et al.  The Double Edge of Common Interest , 2012 .

[19]  G. Āllport The Nature of Prejudice , 1954 .

[20]  J. Moody Race, School Integration, and Friendship Segregation in America1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[21]  H. Tajfel,et al.  An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. , 1979 .

[22]  F. Harary,et al.  STRUCTURAL BALANCE: A GENERALIZATION OF HEIDER'S THEORY1 , 1977 .

[23]  Wander Jager,et al.  Uniformity, Bipolarization and Pluriformity Captured as Generic Stylized Behavior with an Agent-Based Simulation Model of Attitude Change , 2005, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[24]  M. Semyonov,et al.  The Rise of Anti-foreigner Sentiment in European Societies, 1988-2000 , 2006 .

[25]  Guillaume Deffuant,et al.  A Rejection Mechanism in 2D Bounded Confidence Provides More Conformity , 2008, Adv. Complex Syst..

[26]  O. J. Harvey,et al.  Assimilation and contrast effects in reactions to communication and attitude change. , 1957, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[27]  S. Levin,et al.  The dynamics of political polarization , 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  Claudio Altafini,et al.  Consensus Problems on Networks With Antagonistic Interactions , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[29]  Károly Takács,et al.  Discrepancy and Disliking Do Not Induce Negative Opinion Shifts , 2016, PloS one.

[30]  Andreas Flache,et al.  Cultural Integration and Differentiation in Groups and Organizations , 2014, Perspectives on Culture and Agent-based Simulations.

[31]  R. Axelrod The Dissemination of Culture , 1997 .

[32]  Kyle L. Saunders,et al.  Is Polarization a Myth? , 2008, The Journal of Politics.

[33]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  Homophily and assimilation among sportactive adolescent substance users , 2006 .

[34]  René Veenstra,et al.  Generalization of Positive and Negative Attitudes Toward Individuals to Outgroup Attitudes , 2013, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[35]  Andreas Wimmer,et al.  The Making and Unmaking of Ethnic Boundaries: A Multilevel Process Theory1 , 2008, American Journal of Sociology.

[36]  M. Brewer The Psychology of Prejudice: Ingroup Love and Outgroup Hate? , 1999 .

[37]  Noah E. Friedkin,et al.  Norm formation in social influence networks , 2001, Soc. Networks.

[38]  M. Macy,et al.  Small Worlds and Cultural Polarization , 2011 .

[39]  Andreas Flache,et al.  How, when and where can Spatial Segregation Induce Opinion Polarization? Two Competing Models , 2017, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[40]  André Grow,et al.  How attitude certainty tempers the effects of faultlines in demographically diverse teams , 2011, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[41]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[42]  D. Byrne The Attraction Paradigm , 1971 .

[43]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Individualization as Driving Force of Clustering Phenomena in Humans , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[44]  M. Fiorina,et al.  Political Polarization in the American Public , 2008 .

[45]  Matthew Gentzkow,et al.  Polarization in 2016 , 2016 .

[46]  Alexey S. Matveev,et al.  Opinion Dynamics in Social Networks With Hostile Camps: Consensus vs. Polarization , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[47]  Kathryn C. Oleson,et al.  When exceptions prove the rule: how extremity of deviance determines the impact of deviant examples on stereotypes. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[48]  M. Macy Polarization in Dynamic Networks : A Hopfield Model of Emergent Structure , 2003 .

[49]  Nicole Tausch,et al.  When Group Memberships are Negative: The Concept, Measurement, and Behavioral Implications of Psychological Disidentification , 2014 .

[50]  Andreas Flache,et al.  Why do faultlines matter? A computational model of how strong demographic faultlines undermine team cohesion , 2008, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.

[51]  J. K. Murnighan,et al.  Demographic Diversity and Faultlines: The Compositional DYnamics of Organizational Groups , 1998 .

[52]  R. Brown,et al.  Nationalism and patriotism: national identification and out-group rejection. , 2001, The British journal of social psychology.

[53]  Miles Hewstone,et al.  COGNITIVE MODELS OF STEREOTYPE CHANGE , 1992 .

[54]  M. Hewstone,et al.  Improving intergroup relations with extended and vicarious forms of indirect contact , 2014 .

[55]  Guillaume Deffuant,et al.  Mixing beliefs among interacting agents , 2000, Adv. Complex Syst..

[56]  Lauren McLaren,et al.  Anti-Immigrant Prejudice in Europe: Contact, Threat Perception, and Preferences for the Exclusion of Migrants , 2003 .

[57]  K. Rothermund,et al.  And Yet They Move: The Impact of Direction of Deviance on Stereotype Change , 2009, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[58]  Guillaume Deffuant,et al.  Openness leads to Opinion Stability and Narrowness to volatility , 2010, Adv. Complex Syst..

[59]  Noah Mark,et al.  Culture and Competition: Homophily and distancing Explanations for Cultural Niches , 2003, American Sociological Review.

[60]  John H. Evans,et al.  Have American's Social Attitudes Become More Polarized? , 1996, American Journal of Sociology.

[61]  Karen A. Jehn,et al.  In the Short Term We Divide, in the Long Term We Unite: Demographic Crisscrossing and the Effects of Faultlines on Subgroup Polarization , 2013, Organ. Sci..

[62]  Linda R. Tropp,et al.  A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[63]  R. Crisp,et al.  Accountability moderates member-to-group generalization: Testing a dual process model of stereotype change , 2009 .

[64]  H. Stattin,et al.  Xenophobia and Tolerance Toward Immigrants in Adolescence: Cross-Influence Processes Within Friendships , 2013, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[65]  Lincoln Quillian Prejudice as a response to perceived group threat: population composition and anti-immigrant and racial prejudice in Europe , 1995 .

[66]  P. Burke Distinction: a social critique of the judgement of taste , 1989 .

[67]  Laurent Salzarulo,et al.  A Continuous Opinion Dynamics Model Based on the Principle of Meta-Contrast , 2006, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[68]  M. Brewer The Social Self: On Being the Same and Different at the Same Time , 1991 .