Setting up new chemical engineering degree programmes: Exercises in design and retrofit within constraints

Abstract The rise in popularity of chemical engineering among students entering university has prompted expansion of the UK provision, through increased intake into current degree programmes and with the rise of new providers. The former entails logistical challenges of processing larger numbers through existing infrastructures whilst maintaining the student experience. The latter entails challenges of designing and introducing programmes that build harmoniously on existing non-chemical engineering provision, within the constraints of university validation procedures and physical resources, and in the face of uncertainty around student and staff recruitment, while aspiring to implement best practice in chemical engineering content and pedagogy. Following a review of the UK chemical engineering landscape and a critique of literature guidance on the appropriate content of chemical engineering curricula, this paper illustrates the issues of new programme development through the approaches and experiences of a new provider, the University of Huddersfield, which introduced new chemical engineering programmes from academic year 2013–2014. The paper addresses specifying the content of chemical engineering programmes to align with accreditation requirements and literature advice while maintaining distinctiveness. The constraints imposed by the need to specify and validate courses internally and to minimise substantive programme changes subsequently, whilst responding to the opportunities that arise as staff are recruited and to external developments and unplanned incidents, are highlighted and illustrated, in order to draw lessons that might help to guide other new entrants.

[1]  Warren D. Seider,et al.  Teaching chemical engineering product design , 2012 .

[2]  Jim Petrie,et al.  Chemical Engineering Curriculum Renewal , 2006 .

[3]  John D. Perkins,et al.  Education in process systems engineering past, present and future , 2000 .

[4]  E. Alpay,et al.  Student enthusiasm for engineering: charting changes in student aspirations and motivation , 2008 .

[5]  Edmond P. Byrne,et al.  Chemical engineering in an unsustainable world: Obligations and opportunities , 2009 .

[6]  Marsha C. Lovett,et al.  How learning works , 2010 .

[7]  Daniel J. Belton,et al.  Teaching process simulation using video-enhanced and discovery/inquiry-based learning: Methodology and analysis within a theoretical framework for skill acquisition , 2016 .

[8]  Roland Clift,et al.  Commentary on the Visions , 2003 .

[9]  M. Molzahn,et al.  Chemical Engineering Education in Europe: Trends and Challenges , 2004 .

[10]  Edmond P. Byrne Educating the chemical engineer of the future , 2010 .

[11]  Eric Favre,et al.  Trends in chemical engineering education: Process, product and sustainable chemical engineering challenges , 2008 .

[12]  J. D. Perkins,et al.  Chemical Engineering — the First 100 Years , 2003 .

[13]  Gary Thomas,et al.  Education: A Very Short Introduction , 2013 .

[14]  Alírio E. Rodrigues,et al.  Teaching chemical product design , 2011 .

[15]  Gintaras V. Reklaitis,et al.  Process systems engineering: From Solvay to modern bio- and nanotechnology.: A history of development, successes and prospects for the future , 2011 .

[16]  Richard M. Felder,et al.  Designing better engineering education through assessment : a practical resource for faculty and department chairs on using assessment and ABET criteria to improve student learning , 2008 .

[17]  V. S. Vaidhyanathan,et al.  Transport phenomena , 2005, Experientia.

[18]  Grant M. Campbell,et al.  Encouraging engineers to read: A book-based final year assessment , 2010 .

[19]  Jarka Glassey,et al.  Sustainability in chemical engineering curriculum , 2012 .

[20]  Edmond P. Byrne The Role of Specialization in the Chemical Engineering Curriculum , 2006 .

[21]  Velda McCune,et al.  Reflective Teaching in Higher Education , 2015 .