Preliminary report on the validation of a grammar‐based computer system for assessing skeletal maturity with the Tanner‐Whitehouse 2 method

A series of hand and wrist radiographs was assessed manually by two individuals and by a fully automated computer system for determining bone age. Assessments were repeated after 1 month to determine variability between and within the methods of bone age assessment. There was slight intra‐observer variation, but complete reproducibility when assessments were made by computer. The variation between the human assessors was less than that between human and computer assessments. The difference between overall maturity scores made by the human observer and the computer system was, however, acceptably small, and the majority of assessments were the same. It is concluded this computer system for assessing bone age in normal children is reliable and accurate, but that it needs to be validated against a much larger set of radiographs.