Word frequency and bigram frequency effects on linguistic processing and speech motor performance in individuals with aphasia and normal speakers

Models of normal word production are well specified about the effects of frequency of linguistic stimuli on lexical access, but are less clear regarding the same effects on later stages of word production, particularly word articulation. In aphasia, this lack of specificity of down-stream frequency effects is even more noticeable because there is relatively limited amount of data on the time course of frequency effects for this population. This study begins to fill this gap by comparing the effects of variation of word frequency (lexical, whole word) and bigram frequency (sub-lexical, within word) on word production abilities in ten normal speakers and eight mild–moderate individuals with aphasia. In an immediate repetition paradigm, participants repeated single monosyllabic words in which word frequency (high or low) was crossed with bigram frequency (high or low). Indices for mapping the time course for these effects included reaction time (RT) for linguistic processing and motor preparation, and word duration (WD) for speech motor performance (word articulation time). The results indicated that individuals with aphasia had significantly longer RT and WD compared to normal speakers. RT showed a significant main effect only for word frequency (i.e., high-frequency words had shorter RT). WD showed significant main effects of word and bigram frequency; however, contrary to our expectations, high-frequency items had longer WD. Further investigation of WD revealed that independent of the influence of word and bigram frequency, vowel type (tense or lax) had the expected effect on WD. Moreover, individuals with aphasia differed from control speakers in their ability to implement tense vowel duration, even though they could produce an appropriate distinction between tense and lax vowels. The results highlight the importance of using temporal measures to identify subtle deficits in linguistic and speech motor processing in aphasia, the crucial role of phonetic characteristics of stimuli set in studying speech production and the need for the language production models to account more explicitly for word articulation.

[1]  K. M. Heilman,et al.  Cognitive Neuropsychological Analysis and Neuroanatomic Correlates in a Case of Acute Anomia , 1997, Brain and Language.

[2]  Karen Croot,et al.  Diagnosis of AOS: Definition and Criteria , 2002, Seminars in speech and language.

[3]  J. McQueen,et al.  Max-Planck-Institute for Psycholinguistics: Annual Report Nr.16 1995 , 1995 .

[4]  L. F. Brosnahan.  The Sounds Of Language , 1961 .

[5]  Sheila E Blumstein,et al.  Temporal dimensions of consonant and vowel production: An acoustic and CT scan analysis of aphasic speech , 1990, Brain and Language.

[6]  Jean-Luc Nespoulous,et al.  Syllables as units in speech production: Data from aphasia , 2003, Brain and Language.

[7]  Max Coltheart,et al.  Psycholinguistic assessments of language processing in aphasia (PALPA) , 1996 .

[8]  W. Levelt,et al.  Do speakers have access to a mental syllabary? , 1994, Cognition.

[9]  Sheila E. Blumstein,et al.  5 – Phonological Aspects of Aphasia , 1998 .

[10]  M. McNeil,et al.  Phonetic encoding of infrequent articulatory phonetic transitions , 2005 .

[11]  M.Alison Crerar,et al.  Aphasia rehabilitation and the strange neglect of speed , 2004 .

[12]  M. Gernsbacher.  Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[13]  Sally Andrews,et al.  Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy? , 1992 .

[14]  Chris Westbury,et al.  The Probability of the Least Likely Non-Length-Controlled Bigram Affects Lexical Decision Reaction Times , 2002, Brain and Language.

[15]  Raymond D. Kent,et al.  Chapter 12 Motoric Characteristics of Adult Aphasic and Apraxic Speakers , 1990 .

[16]  J. Gandour,et al.  Identification of tonal contrasts in Thai aphasic patients , 1983, Brain and Language.

[17]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer , 2002 .

[18]  R. Ratcliff.  Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[19]  W. Levelt,et al.  Word frequency effects in speech production: Retrieval of syntactic information and of phonological form , 1994 .

[20]  Robert L. Solso,et al.  Bigram and trigram frequencies and versatilities in the English language , 1979 .

[21]  J. Ryalls,et al.  Phonetic approaches to speech production in aphasia and related disorders , 1987 .

[22]  S. Blumstein,et al.  Frequency, picturability and availability of nouns in aphasia. , 1969, Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior.

[23]  Michael C. Doyle,et al.  Effects of frequency on visual word recognition tasks: where are they? , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[24]  G. V. van Orden,et al.  Variability in Aphasic Patients' Response Times , 2002, Brain and Cognition.

[25]  Michael Wilson,et al.  MRC psycholinguistic database: Machine-usable dictionary, version 2.00 , 1988 .

[26]  R. Nass,et al.  The assessment of aphasia and related disorders By Harold Goodglass and edith kaplan philadelphia, lea & febiger, 1983 illustrated, $27.50 (package) , 1984 .

[27]  P. Ladefoged,et al.  Fundamental problems in phonetics , 1977 .

[28]  J. Gandour,et al.  Voice onset time in aphasia: Thai II. Production , 1984, Brain and Language.

[29]  M. Damian.  Articulatory duration in single-word speech production. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[30]  Max Coltheart,et al.  Characterizing the motor execution stage of speech production: consonantal effects on delayed naming latency and onset duration. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  A. Ellis,et al.  A cognitive neuropsychological case study of anomia. Implications for psychological models of word retrieval. , 1987, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[32]  M. McNeil.  Clinical Management of Sensorimotor Speech Disorders , 2008 .

[33]  J. Ryalls.  An acoustic study of vowel production in aphasia , 1986, Brain and Language.

[34]  R. Berndt,et al.  Grammatical class and context effects in a case of pure anomia: Implications for models of language production , 1988 .

[35]  Jordan Grafman,et al.  Handbook of Neuropsychology , 1991 .

[36]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[37]  D. Balota,et al.  Factors influencing word naming in younger and older adults. , 2000, Psychology and aging.

[38]  B. Munson,et al.  The effect of phonological neighborhood density on vowel articulation. , 2004, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[39]  Kathleen Rastle,et al.  Is there a syllabary containing stored articulatory plans for speech production in English , 2004 .

[40]  E. Kaplan,et al.  The assessment of aphasia and related disorders , 1972 .

[41]  M. S. Mayzner,et al.  Tables of single-letter and digram frequency counts for various word-length and letter-position combinations. , 1965 .

[42]  D. Benson,et al.  Aphasia: A Clinical Perspective , 1996 .

[43]  Anne Cutler,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[44]  W. Levelt,et al.  Speaking: From Intention to Articulation , 1990 .

[45]  Sandra P. Whiteside,et al.  Apraxia of speech as a disruption of word-level schemata: Some durational evidence , 1999 .

[46]  D. Balota,et al.  The locus of word-frequency effects in the pronunciation task: Lexical access and/or production? ☆ , 1985 .

[47]  W. Hulstijn,et al.  Speech production in people who stutter: testing the motor plan assembly hypothesis. , 1996, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[48]  D. Balota,et al.  Where are the effects of frequency in visual word recognition tasks? Right where we said they were! Comment on Monsell, Doyle, and Haggard (1989). , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[49]  K S Harris,et al.  Electromyographic studies of articulation in aphasia. , 1968, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[50]  Linda Wheeldon,et al.  Aspects of language production , 2000 .

[51]  Pascal van Lieshout,et al.  Speech production : motor control, brain research and fluency disorders , 1997 .

[52]  M. Carreiras,et al.  Effects of Syllable Frequency and Syllable Neighborhood Frequency in Visual Word Recognition , 1998 .