Impact of DEM mesh size and soil map scale on SWAT runoff, sediment, and NO3-N loads predictions

The accuracy of agricultural nonpoint source pollution models depends to a great extent on how well model input spatial parameters describe the relevant characteristics of the watershed. It is assumed that reducing the precision of spatial input parameters affects the simulation results of runoff and sediment yield from the entire watershed. However, there may be no significant increase in the accuracy of models, as a result of more precise topographic or soil information, which increase the input data collection and preparation. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of the mesh size of the digital elevation model, DEM (from 20 to 500 m) and the soil map scale (1/25,000; 1/250,000 and; 1/500,000 scale) within the Soil and Water Analysis Tool (SWAT) to simulate runoff, sediment, and NO3–N loads at the outlet of an agricultural watershed. Results of the Lower Walnut Creek (21.8 km 2 , central Iowa) showed that an upper limit to DEM mesh size of 50 m is required to simulate watershed loads. Decreasing the mesh size beyond this threshold does not substantially affect the computed runoff flux but generated prediction errors for nitrogen and sediment yields. Whatever the DEM mesh size considered, a detailed soil map has to be considered to accurately estimate the loads. Finally, the impacts of DEM mesh size and soil map scale on the modeling results are discussed in respect of the relevant characteristics of the watershed and included in SWAT. q 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

[1]  D. A. Woolhiser,et al.  Model Complexity Required to Maintain Hydrologic Response , 1988 .

[2]  V. Singh,et al.  The EPIC model. , 1995 .

[3]  Jerry L. Hatfield,et al.  Water Quality in Walnut Creek Watershed: Herbicides and Nitrate in Surface Waters , 1999 .

[4]  D. Montgomery,et al.  Digital elevation model grid size, landscape representation, and hydrologic simulations , 1994 .

[5]  J. Arnold,et al.  Predicting Water, Sediment and NO3-N Loads under Scenarios of Land-use and Management Practices in a Flat Watershed , 2004 .

[6]  John R. Williams,et al.  LARGE AREA HYDROLOGIC MODELING AND ASSESSMENT PART I: MODEL DEVELOPMENT 1 , 1998 .

[7]  John H. Prueger,et al.  Water Quality in Walnut Creek Watershed: Setting and Farming Practices , 1999 .

[8]  N. Farajalla,et al.  Capturing the essential spatial variability in distributed hydrological modelling: Infiltration parameters , 1995 .

[9]  K. Beven,et al.  A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology , 1979 .

[10]  P. J. Horick,et al.  Mississippian aquifer of Iowa , 1973 .

[11]  Baxter E. Vieux,et al.  Closure of "Nonpoint-Pollution Model Sensitivity to Grid-Cell Size" , 1993 .

[12]  F. Nachtergaele Soil taxonomy—a basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys: Second edition, by Soil Survey Staff, 1999, USDA–NRCS, Agriculture Handbook number 436, Hardbound , 2001 .

[13]  Ling Bian,et al.  Response of a distributed watershed erosion model to variations in input data aggregation levels , 1993 .

[14]  K. Beven,et al.  THE PREDICTION OF HILLSLOPE FLOW PATHS FOR DISTRIBUTED HYDROLOGICAL MODELLING USING DIGITAL TERRAIN MODELS , 1991 .

[15]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  Scale issues in hydrological modelling: A review , 1995 .

[16]  R. Govindaraju,et al.  Effect of geomorphologic resolution on modeling of runoff hydrograph and sedimentograph over small watersheds , 2003 .

[17]  Christian Walter,et al.  Improving soil hydromorphy prediction according to DEM resolution and available pedological data , 2000 .

[18]  James Brasington,et al.  Interactions between model predictions, parameters and DTM scales for TOPMODEL , 1998 .

[19]  D. Mackay,et al.  Impacts of input parameter spatial aggregation on an agricultural nonpoint source pollution model , 2000 .

[20]  Jay C. Bell,et al.  Digital elevation model resolution: effects on terrain attribute calculation and quantitative soil-landscape modeling , 2001 .

[21]  V. Singh,et al.  Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology , 1995 .