In this work, we explore techniques for improving the performance of the automated theorem proving system E when dealing with large watchlists. A watchlist can focus the proof search towards so-called hints, likely useful intermediate results provided externally. Recently, hints have been automatically extracted from previous proofs, creating massive watchlists and thus making evaluation of new clauses against the wachtlist a performance bottleneck. We introduce a new index for the frequent special case of unit clause hints, taking advantage of the fact that subsumption can be implemented much more efficiently for unit clauses than for the general case. We implement several strategies for exploiting the structure and properties of equational unit clauses. Additionally, we have added a new soft subsumption mechanism to E that can abstract away differences of constant or Skolem symbols, effectively allowing a less precise match when evaluating a given clause against the watchlist. We have tested the new mechanisms on a large set of problems taken from the Mizar 40 project, using a large watchlist containing over 300 000 clauses. We show that the usage of the unit clause index significantly increases performance with this given watchlist. The use of soft subsumption shows more mixed results. We believe that most watchlists can take advantage of these techniques and have made them available to the user via E’s command line interface.
[1]
Stephan Schulz,et al.
E - a brainiac theorem prover
,
2002,
AI Commun..
[2]
Josef Urban,et al.
ProofWatch: Watchlist Guidance for Large Theories in E
,
2018,
ITP.
[3]
Stephan Schulz,et al.
Simple and Efficient Clause Subsumption with Feature Vector Indexing
,
2013,
Automated Reasoning and Mathematics.
[4]
William McCune,et al.
Experiments with discrimination-tree indexing and path indexing for term retrieval
,
1992,
Journal of Automated Reasoning.
[5]
Josef Urban,et al.
ENIGMAWatch: ProofWatch Meets ENIGMA
,
2019,
TABLEAUX.
[6]
Simon Cruanes,et al.
Faster, Higher, Stronger: E 2.3
,
2019,
CADE.
[7]
Harald Ganzinger,et al.
Rewrite-Based Equational Theorem Proving with Selection and Simplification
,
1994,
J. Log. Comput..
[8]
Robert Veroff,et al.
Using hints to increase the effectiveness of an automated reasoning program: Case studies
,
1996,
Journal of Automated Reasoning.
[9]
Stephan Schulz.
Fingerprint Indexing for Paramodulation and Rewriting
,
2012,
IJCAR.
[10]
Stephan Schulz,et al.
Performance of Clause Selection Heuristics for Saturation-Based Theorem Proving
,
2016,
IJCAR.
[11]
William McCune.
Otter 2.0
,
1990,
CADE.
[12]
Cezary Kaliszyk,et al.
MizAR 40 for Mizar 40
,
2013,
Journal of Automated Reasoning.