Mapping from Sound to Meaning: Reduced Lexical Activation in Broca's Aphasics

Recent studies of lexical access in Broca's aphasics suggest that lexical activation levels are reduced in these patients. The present study compared the performance of Broca's aphasics with that of normal subjects in an auditory semantic priming paradigm. Lexical decision times were measured in response to word targets preceded by an intact semantically related prime word ("cat"-"dog"), by a related prime in which one segment was acoustically altered to produce a poorer phonetic exemplar ("c*at"-"dog"), and by a semantically unrelated prime ("ring"-"dog"). The effects of the locus of the acoustic distortion within the prime word (initial or final position) and the presence of potential lexical competitors ("cat" --> /gaet/versus "coat" --> "goat") were examined. In normal subjects, the acoustic manipulations produce a small, short-lived reduction in semantic facilitation irrespective of the position of the distortion in the prime word or the presence of a voiced lexical competitor. In contrast, Broca's aphasics showed a large and lasting reduction in priming in response to word-initial acoustic distortions, but only a weak effect of word-final distortions on priming. In both phonetic positions, the effect of distortion was greater for prime words with a lexical competitor. These findings are compatible with the claim that Broca's aphasics have reduced lexical activation levels, which may result in a disruption of the bottom-up access of words on the basis of acoustic input as well as increased vulnerability to competition between acoustically similar lexical items.

[1]  P K Kuhl,et al.  Enhanced discriminability at the phonetic boundaries for the voicing feature in macaques , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  H. Kolk,et al.  Agrammatism as a variable phenomenon , 1985 .

[3]  J. L. Miller,et al.  Phonetic prototypes: influence of place of articulation and speaking rate on the internal structure of voicing categories. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  The mental representation of lexical form: A phonological approach to the recognition lexicon , 1991, Cognition.

[5]  Jeffrey L. Elman,et al.  Connectionist approaches to acoustic/phonetic processing , 1989 .

[6]  S. Blumstein,et al.  Phonological processing and lexical access in aphasia , 1988, Brain and Language.

[7]  P. Kuhl Human adults and human infants show a “perceptual magnet effect” for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  S. Blumstein,et al.  The effect of subphonetic differences on lexical access , 1994, Cognition.

[9]  E. Kaplan,et al.  The assessment of aphasia and related disorders , 1972 .

[10]  Edgar Zurif,et al.  Slowed lexical access in nonfluent aphasia: A case study , 1992, Brain and Language.

[11]  S. Blumstein,et al.  Lexical decision and aphasia: Evidence for semantic processing , 1981, Brain and Language.

[12]  A G Samuel,et al.  Phonetic prototypes , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  Aditi Lahiri,et al.  Gesture, Segment, Prosody: Lexical processing and phonological representation , 1992 .

[14]  S. E. Blumstein,et al.  Processing of lexical ambiguities in aphasia , 1987, Brain and Language.

[15]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories , 1974, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The TRACE model of speech perception , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[17]  J. L. Miller,et al.  Effect of speaking rate on the perceptual structure of a phonetic category , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Lexical Representation and Process , 1991 .

[19]  D Swinney,et al.  Real-time examinations of lexical processing in aphasics , 1991, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[20]  Sheila E. Blumstein,et al.  Semantic processing in aphasia: Evidence from an auditory lexical decision task , 1982, Brain and Language.

[21]  J A Utman,et al.  Effects of local speaking rate context on the perception of voice-onset time in initial stop consonants. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  D. Swinney,et al.  The Effects of Focal Brain Damage on Sentence Processing: an examination of the neurological organization of a mental module , 1989, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Continuous uptake of acoustic cues in spoken word recognition , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  R. Burchfield Frequency Analysis of English Usage: Lexicon and Grammar. By W. Nelson Francis and Henry Kučera with the assistance of Andrew W. Mackie. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. 1982. x + 561 , 1985 .

[25]  S. Blumstein,et al.  Semantic Facutation in Aphasia: Effects of Time and Expectancy , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[26]  J. H. Neely Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. , 1977 .

[27]  S. Blumstein,et al.  Phonological factors in lexical access: Evidence from an auditory lexical decision task , 1988 .

[28]  Irene P. Kan,et al.  Verb generation in patients with focal frontal lesions: a neuropsychological test of neuroimaging findings. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  Understanding ambiguous words in sentence contexts: electrophysiological evidence for delayed contextual selection in Broca’s aphasia , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[30]  Discrimination and identification of voicing and place contrasts in aphasic patients. , 1983 .

[31]  W. Nelson Francis,et al.  FREQUENCY ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH USAGE: LEXICON AND GRAMMAR , 1983 .