The EMAS impasse: Factors influencing Italian organizations to withdraw or renew the registration

Abstract The Environmental Management Systems (EMSs) are voluntary tools with which companies manage the environmental aspects of their operations. In Europe, the most widespread are the ISO 14001:2015 international standard and the one defined by the European Regulation EMAS (Eco-Management and Audit Scheme). During the last years, while the number of ISO 14001 certified organizations has constantly grown, EMAS registered organizations have been declining. This phenomenon has occurred also in Italy, which accounts for roughly one-fourth of the 4000 European registrations. Only few scholars have explored this phenomenon and the existing relationship between EMAS outcomes and the decision to renew the Registration. Focusing on the Italian context, this paper aims at reducing this gap. The study presents the results of a survey, targeted to Italian EMAS organizations, that through a questionnaire investigates how the Scheme impacts on organizations' operations. Results have been analyzed using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), Cluster Analysis and Binary Logistic Regressions, with the main goal to evaluate whether EMAS perceived benefits are significant in the decision to maintain the registration. Moreover, it explores the existence of significant linkages between organizations’ characteristics and their willingness to renew EMAS. Findings show a significant predisposition to renew the registration, especially for small-sized organizations. Conversely, there is a negative link between renewal intentions and the possession of ISO 14001 certification. Finally, perceived benefits gained with EMAS implementation are not constantly significant predictors of the willingness to renew the registration. Despite the negative growth trend, the high levels of willingness to renew EMAS expressed by the respondents confirm the tool as a valuable resource and a solid baseline toward the implementation of more sustainable business models. Additionally, positive outcomes of EMAS such as the maximization of material productivity and energy efficiency, the creation of value from waste and the implementation of standardized environmental indicators may support organizations in the transition toward circular economy.

[1]  E. Paiva,et al.  ISO 14001 certification in Brazil: motivations and benefits , 2008 .

[2]  Jamie P. MacDonald,et al.  Strategic sustainable development using the ISO 14001 Standard , 2005 .

[3]  M. Martín-Peña,et al.  Analysis of benefits and difficulties associated with firms' Environmental Management Systems: the case of the Spanish automotive industry , 2014 .

[4]  Ercan Sirakaya-Turk,et al.  The Efficacy of Sustainability Values in Predicting Travelers’ Choices for Sustainable Hospitality Businesses , 2014 .

[5]  Francesco Testa,et al.  EMAS and ISO 14001: the differences in effectively improving environmental performance , 2014 .

[6]  John Mullahy,et al.  HETEROGENEITY, EXCESS ZEROS, AND THE STRUCTURE OF COUNT DATA MODELS , 1997 .

[7]  Brian Everitt,et al.  Cluster analysis , 1974 .

[8]  Purba Rao.  The greening of suppliers—in the South East Asian context , 2005 .

[9]  Francesco Testa,et al.  Environmental Management System and SMEs: EU Experience, Barriers and Perspectives , 2010 .

[10]  Krystyna Anne Stave,et al.  Participatory system dynamics modeling for sustainable environmental management: Observations from four cases , 2010 .

[11]  Nuno Videira,et al.  Why, How and What do Organizations Achieve with the Implementation of Environmental Management Systems?—Lessons from a Comprehensive Review on the Eco-Management and Audit Scheme , 2016 .

[12]  F. Testa,et al.  Public regulatory relief and the adoption of environmental management systems: a European survey , 2016 .

[13]  H. Kaiser.  An index of factorial simplicity , 1974 .

[14]  H. Kaiser.  The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis , 1958 .

[15]  O. Boiral,et al.  ISO 9001 and ISO 14001: Towards a Research Agenda on Management System Standards , 2013 .

[16]  Peter Willett,et al.  Recent trends in hierarchic document clustering: A critical review , 1988, Inf. Process. Manag..

[17]  Carme Hervada-Sala,et al.  A program to perform Ward's clustering method on several regionalized variables , 2004, Comput. Geosci..

[18]  F. Testa,et al.  Is an Environmental Management System able to influence environmental and competitive performance? The case of the Eco-Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS) in the European Union , 2009 .

[19]  Dennis R. Howard,et al.  Consumer Involvement Profiles as a Tourism Segmentation Tool , 1993 .

[20]  J. Hair.  Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[21]  Linda C. Angell,et al.  Integrating environmental issues into the mainstream: an agenda for research in operations management , 1999 .

[22]  Matthias Finkbeiner,et al.  Product environmental footprint—breakthrough or breakdown for policy implementation of life cycle assessment? , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[23]  M Park,et al.  Segmenting casino gamblers by involvement profiles: a Colorado example , 2002 .

[24]  R. Merli,et al.  EMAS Regulation in Italian Clusters: Investigating the Involvement of Local Stakeholders , 2013 .

[25]  M. Clarkson.  A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance , 1995 .

[26]  J. Logsdon,et al.  Organizational responses to environmental issues : oil refining companies and air pollution , 1983 .

[27]  Fabio Iraldo,et al.  Do environmental management systems improve environmental performance? Empirical evidence from Italian companies , 2011 .

[28]  Nils Thorsen,et al.  Regulatory and self-regulatory measures as routes to promote cleaner production , 1999 .

[29]  R. Bracke,et al.  Competing Environmental Management Standards: How ISO 14001 Outnumbered EMAS in Germany, the UK, France, and Sweden , 2007 .

[30]  D. Collett.  Modelling Binary Data , 1991 .

[31]  Allen I. Huffcutt,et al.  A Review and Evaluation of Exploratory Factor Analysis Practices in Organizational Research , 2003 .

[32]  Removing and simplifying administrative costs and burdens for EMAS and ISO 14001 certified organizations: evidences from Italy , 2014 .

[33]  Anette Von Ahsen,et al.  Corporate environmental reporting: survey and empirical evidence , 2004 .

[34]  S. Evans,et al.  A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes , 2014 .

[35]  C. Mood.  Logistic Regression: Why We Cannot Do What We Think We Can Do, and What We Can Do About It , 2010 .

[36]  Paulo Augusto Cauchick Miguel,et al.  Environmental performance indicators: a study on ISO 14001 certified companies , 2015 .

[37]  David J. Ketchen,et al.  THE APPLICATION OF CLUSTER ANALYSIS IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT RESEARCH: AN ANALYSIS AND CRITIQUE , 1996 .

[38]  Sophia Rabe-Hesketh,et al.  Redundant Overdispersion Parameters in Multilevel Models for Categorical Responses , 2007 .

[39]  O. Boiral,et al.  Exploring the dissemination of environmental certifications in high and low polluting industries , 2015 .

[40]  J. González‐Benito,et al.  The role of stakeholder pressure and managerial values in the implementation of environmental logistics practices , 2006 .

[41]  S. Botta,et al.  EMAS in local authorities: Suitable indicators in adopting environmental management systems , 2012 .

[42]  G. W. Milligan,et al.  An examination of procedures for determining the number of clusters in a data set , 1985 .

[43]  Jason W. Osborne,et al.  Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. , 2005 .

[44]  Klaus Rennings,et al.  The Influence of the EU Environmental Management and Auditing Scheme on Environmental Innovations and Competitiveness in Germany: An Analysis on the Basis of Case Studies and a Large-Scale Survey , 2003 .

[45]  M. Taisch,et al.  Sustainable manufacturing: trends and research challenges , 2012 .

[46]  Gábor J. Székely,et al.  Hierarchical Clustering via Joint Between-Within Distances: Extending Ward's Minimum Variance Method , 2005, J. Classif..

[47]  Lucila Maria de Souza Campos,et al.  Environmental management systems (EMS) for small companies: a study in Southern Brazil , 2012 .

[48]  I. Jolliffe.  Principal Component Analysis , 2002 .

[49]  N. Dentchev.  INTEGRATING CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY IN BUSINESS MODELS , 2005 .

[50]  W. Kibicho.  Community-based Tourism: A Factor-Cluster Segmentation Approach , 2008 .

[51]  S. Ulgiati,et al.  A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems , 2016 .

[52]  David E. Ervin,et al.  Motivations for Voluntary Environmental Management , 2007 .

[53]  Girish N. Punj,et al.  Cluster Analysis in Marketing Research: Review and Suggestions for Application , 1983 .

[54]  James E. Bartlett,et al.  Organizational research: Determining appropriate sample size in survey research , 2001 .

[55]  José Emilio Navas-López,et al.  The importance of the complementarity between environmental management systems and environmental innovation capabilities: A firm level approach to environmental and business performance benefits , 2015 .

[56]  Roberto Merli,et al.  Why Companies Do Not Renew Their EMAS Registration? An Exploratory Research , 2016 .

[57]  R. Garland.  The Mid-Point on a Rating Scale: Is it Desirable? , 1991 .

[58]  A. Martinuzzi,et al.  Corporations, Stakeholders and Sustainable Development I: A Theoretical Exploration of Business–Society Relations , 2005 .

[59]  R. Freeman.  Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach , 2010 .

[60]  Unobserved heterogeneity and the comparison of coefficients across nested logistic regression models: how to avoid comparing apples and oranges , 2017, International Journal of Public Health.

[61]  Florian Lüdeke-Freund,et al.  Business Cases for Sustainability: The Role of Business Model Innovation for Corporate Sustainability , 2012 .

[62]  Iñaki Heras-Saizarbitoria,et al.  Renewing environmental certification in times of crisis , 2016 .

[63]  F. Testa,et al.  Environmental Performance Improvements and External Stakeholder Pressures in Companies with Certified Environmental Management System , 2021, International Journal of Materials.

[64]  L. Yorks,et al.  Looking Back at Topeka: General Foods and the Quality-of-Work-Life Experiment , 1983 .

[65]  Andreas R. Ziegler,et al.  The influence of different characteristics of the EU environmental management and auditing scheme on technical environmental innovations and economic performance , 2006 .

[66]  Muzaffer Uysal,et al.  Travel Motivations of Japanese Overseas Travelers: A Factor-Cluster Segmentation Approach , 1995 .

[67]  M. Bartlett.  TESTS OF SIGNIFICANCE IN FACTOR ANALYSIS , 1950 .

[68]  Esben Rahbek Gjerdrum Pedersen.  Perceptions of performance: how European organizations experience EMAS registration , 2007 .

[69]  M. Delmas,et al.  The Diffusion of Voluntary International Management Standards: Responsible Care, ISO 9000, and ISO 14001 in the Chemical Industry , 2007 .

[70]  J. Morelli.  Environmental Sustainability: A Definition for Environmental Professionals , 2011 .

[71]  J. Ulhøi,et al.  Integrating environmental and stakeholder management , 2001 .

[72]  R. E. Freeman,et al.  Stockholders and Stakeholders: A New Perspective on Corporate Governance , 1983 .

[73]  Luis Miguel Fonseca,et al.  ISO 14001: 2015: An improved tool for sustainability , 2015 .

[74]  Roberto Bermejo.  Circular Economy: Materials Scarcity, European Union Policy and Foundations of a Circular Economy , 2014 .

[75]  Giuseppe Tassielli,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of Steel Produced in an Italian Integrated Steel Mill , 2016 .

[76]  F. Testa,et al.  Cluster approach and eco-innovation in four industrial clusters of Tuscany region (Italy) , 2017 .

[77]  J. Stevens.  Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences , 1986 .

[78]  Fabio Iraldo,et al.  The effectiveness of cluster approach to improve environmental corporate performance in an industrial district of SMEs: a case study , 2016 .

[79]  R. V. Krejcie,et al.  Determining Sample Size for Research Activities , 1970 .

[80]  C. Cocklin,et al.  Conceptualizing a “Sustainability Business Model” , 2008 .

[81]  F. Testa,et al.  Exploring the link between institutional pressures and environmental management systems effectiveness: An empirical study. , 2016, Journal of environmental management.

[82]  Friederike Neugebauer,et al.  EMAS and ISO 14001 in the German industry – complements or substitutes? , 2012 .

[83]  D. Morrow,et al.  Adopting Corporate Environmental Management Systems:: Motivations and Results of ISO 14001 and EMAS Certification , 2002 .

[84]  A. Rocchi,et al.  EMAS and its local diffusion in Italy , 2003 .

[85]  Ruth Hillary.  Environmental management systems and the smaller enterprise , 2004 .

[86]  L. Fahrmeir,et al.  Multivariate statistical modelling based on generalized linear models , 1994 .