Accessibility to R&D and Patent Production

The main purpose in this paper is to study to what extent accessibility to R&D can explain patent production. Therefore a knowledge production function is estimated both on aggregated level and for different industrial sectors. The output of the knowledge production is the number patent applications in Swedish municipalities from 1994 to 1999. In order to account for the importance of proximity, the explanatory variables are expressed as accessibilities to university and company R&D. The total accessibility is then decomposed into local, intra-regional and inter-regional accessibility to R&D. As often is the case with R&D outputs, the regional distribution of patents is highly skewed with influential outliers. The estimations are therefore conducted with quantile regressions. The main results on aggregated level indicate that high accessibility (local) to company R&D has the greatest positive effects on patent production. The effects are statistically significant for municipalities with a patent production corresponding to the median and to quantiles above the median. Local accessibility to university R&D is only of importance for certain industrial sectors and not on aggregated level. There is also evidence that intra-regional accessibility to company R&D affects patent production positively. A conclusion is that concentrated R&D investments in companies situated in municipalities with a high patenting activity would not only gain the municipalities themselves, but also the patent production in other municipalities in the functional region.

[1]  William Gould,et al.  Quantile regression with bootstrapped standard errors , 1993 .

[2]  M. Feldman,et al.  R&D spillovers and the ge-ography of innovation and production , 1996 .

[3]  M. Spence Cost Reduction, Competition and Industry Performance , 1984 .

[4]  Eric R. Eide,et al.  Factors Affecting the Transmission of Earnings across Generations: A Quantile Regression Approach , 1999 .

[5]  A. Jaffe Real Effects of Academic Research , 1989 .

[6]  Attila Varga,et al.  University Research and Regional Innovation: A Spatial Econometric Analysis of Academic Technology Transfers , 1998 .

[7]  J. Weibull An axiomatic approach to the measurement of accessibility , 1976 .

[8]  Corinne Autant-Bernard The Geography Of Knowledge Spillovers And Technological Proximity , 2001 .

[9]  Attila Varga,et al.  Local Geographic Spillovers between University Research and High Technology Innovations , 1997 .

[10]  Erik E. Lehmann,et al.  University spillovers and new firm location , 2005 .

[11]  Maryann P. Feldman,et al.  The Geographic Sources of Innovation: Technological Infrastructure and Product Innovation in the United States , 1994 .

[12]  Dietmar Harhoff,et al.  Firm Formation And Regional Spillovers - Evidence From Germany , 1999 .

[13]  H. White A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity , 1980 .

[14]  W. Rogers Quantile regression standard errors , 1993 .

[15]  Giovanni Peri,et al.  Knowledge Flows and Knowledge Externalities , 2002, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[16]  L. Anselin,et al.  Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge , 2002 .

[17]  A. Chandler,et al.  Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 , 1994 .

[18]  Eric R. Eide,et al.  The effect of school quality on student performance: A quantile regression approach , 1998 .

[19]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[20]  Victor Chernozhukov,et al.  Conditional value-at-risk: Aspects of modeling and estimation , 2000 .

[21]  A. Varga Universities and Regional Economic Development: Does Agglomeration Matter? , 2001 .

[22]  Leo Sveikauskas,et al.  The Contribution of R&D to Productivity Growth. , 1986 .

[23]  W. Rogers Calculation of quantile regression standard errors , 1994 .

[24]  Alfred Kleinknecht,et al.  The Non-Trivial Choice between Innovation Indicators , 2002 .

[25]  Attila Varga,et al.  Local academic knowledge spillovers and the concentration of economic activity , 1998 .

[26]  C. Karlsson,et al.  Knowledge Spillovers in a Spatial Context — A Critical Review and Assessment , 2001 .

[27]  Stephen Portnoy,et al.  Censored Regression Quantiles , 2003 .

[28]  Pravin K. Trivedi,et al.  Essentials of Count Data Regression , 2007 .

[29]  Manfred M. Fischer,et al.  Spatial knowledge spillovers and university research: Evidence from Austria , 2003 .

[30]  Moshe Buchinsky Recent Advances in Quantile Regression Models: A Practical Guideline for Empirical Research , 1998 .

[31]  J. Powell,et al.  Least absolute deviations estimation for the censored regression model , 1984 .

[32]  R. Koenker,et al.  Robust Tests for Heteroscedasticity Based on Regression Quantiles , 1982 .

[33]  Börje Johansson,et al.  Commuters’ non-linear response to time distances , 2003, J. Geogr. Syst..

[34]  S. Breschi,et al.  Knowledge Spillovers And Local Innovation Systems: A Critical Survey , 2001 .

[35]  Manfred M. Fischer,et al.  Spatial knowledge spillovers and university research: Evidence from Austria , 2003 .

[36]  Martin Andersson,et al.  The role of accessibility for regional innovation systems , 2002 .

[37]  L. Bottazzi,et al.  Innovation and Spillovers in Regions: Evidence from European Patent Data , 2002 .