Perceiving the Actions of Other People

What is responsible for the commonality of perception across individuals? This article examines this question from an ecological perspective, beginning with Gibson's (1979/1986) conception of the optic array, which establishes that information about the world is public, that is, available to any observer. Experiments on sitting, bipedal climbing, stepping across gaps, and reaching showed that observers were able to perceive critical action boundaries for other people as accurately as they did for themselves. For each action the obtained critical boundaries were invariant across diverse actors when expressed in terms of relevant aspects of the prospective actor's body scale. This was true when observers judged their own action capabilities as well as when they judged the capabilities of other people. Two additional experiments examined observers' ability to perceive someone else's intention from seeing another person's actions. These experiments provide additional support for Runeson and Frykholm's (1981, 1983) kirematics specifies dynamics principle. Together these findings show that observers can make accurate judgments about the action capabilities and intentions of other people as they perform goal-directed actions. This outcome is consistent with the prediction from Gibson's notion that information is public. Thus, the commonality of perceptual experience among people is the result of the public availability of information about what the environment affords a prospective actor.

[1]  K. Newell,et al.  The scaling of human grip configurations. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  R. Baron,et al.  Toward an Ecological Theory of Social Perception , 1983 .

[3]  M. S. Mayzner,et al.  Cognition And Reality , 1976 .

[4]  K. Newell,et al.  Body scale and the development of prehension. , 1989, Developmental psychobiology.

[5]  S. Asch Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. , 1956 .

[6]  M. Turvey,et al.  Visually perceiving what is reachable. , 1989 .

[7]  W H Warren,et al.  Perceiving affordances: visual guidance of stair climbing. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  T. Stoffregen,et al.  Perceiving affordances for another person's actions. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  P. B. Pufall,et al.  Perceiving Whether or Not the World Affords Stepping Onto and Over: A Developmental Study , 1992 .

[10]  Bert H. Hodges,et al.  A Nonconformist Account of the Asch Experiments: Values, Pragmatics, and Moral Dilemmas , 2006, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[11]  P. Beek,et al.  The State of Ecological Psychology , 1995 .

[12]  S. Runeson On visual perception of dynamic events , 1983 .

[13]  U. Neisser On "Social Knowing" , 1980 .

[14]  James A. Balliett,et al.  What an actor must do in order to perceive the affordance for sitting. , 1990 .

[15]  L. S. Mark,et al.  The impact of visual exploration of judgments of whether a gap is crossable. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  Bert H. Hodges,et al.  Carrying Babies and Groceries: The Effect of Moral and Social Weight on Caring , 2006 .

[17]  P. Knowles,et al.  The ecological perspective applied to social perception: Revision of a working paper , 1982 .

[18]  L. S. Mark,et al.  Scaling affordances for human reach actions. , 2004, Human movement science.

[19]  L. S. Mark,et al.  Eyeheight-scaled information about affordances: a study of sitting and stair climbing. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  S. Kassin,et al.  A Perceptual View of Attribution , 1980 .

[21]  L. S. Mark,et al.  How Do Task Characteristics Affect the Transitions Between Seated and Standing Reaches? , 2001 .

[22]  W. Warren,et al.  Visual guidance of walking through apertures: body-scaled information for affordances. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  L S Mark,et al.  Postural dynamics and the preferred critical boundary for visually guided reaching. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  Heft Harry,et al.  A Methodological Note on Overestimates of Reaching Distance: Distinguishing Between Perceptual and Analytical Judgments , 1993 .

[25]  S. Valenti,et al.  Perception of Social Affordances by Children With Mild Handicapping Conditions: Implications for Social Skills Research and Training , 1989 .

[26]  P. Rochat Perceived reachability for self and for others by 3- to 5-year-old children and adults. , 1995, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[27]  L S Mark,et al.  A biodynamic basis for perceived categories of action: a study of sitting and stair climbing. , 1987, Journal of motor behavior.

[28]  K. Newell,et al.  Body-scaled transitions in human grip configurations. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[30]  J. Konczak,et al.  Changing affordances in stair climbing: the perception of maximum climbability in young and older adults. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  S. Runeson,et al.  Visual perception of lifted weight. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  Contrasting Approaches to Social Knowing , 1980 .

[33]  L S Mark,et al.  The effect of gap depth on the perception of whether a gap is crossable , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[34]  S. Runeson,et al.  Kinematic specification of dynamics as an informational basis for person and action perception: Expe , 1983 .