Bidirectional possibilistic dominance in uncertain decision making

Abstract Our concern is with comparing variables whose values are possibility distributions on an ordered space Y. We introduce the idea of a possibilistic exceedance function, PED, a function that indicates the possibility that the value of variable is at least as large a given value in Y. We use this to define the idea of possibilistic dominance. We say one possibility distribution possibilistically dominates another distribution if its PED has at least as large value for all elements in Y. We suggest that possibilistic dominance can be used to order possibility distributions. We introduce surrogates for possibilistic dominance. We then point out that if one distribution has a PED at least large as another distribution for all elements in Y then it has a bigger possibility of attaining both large and small values in Y. In order to circumvent this we introduce the idea of bi-directional possibilistic dominance, here we require the dominant distribution to have a larger PED value for the higher values in Y and a smaller PED for the lower values in Y.

[1]  N. Shilkret Maxitive measure and integration , 1971 .

[2]  L. Zadeh Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility , 1999 .

[3]  Svetlozar T. Rachev,et al.  Orderings and Risk Probability Functionals in Portfolio Theory , 2008 .

[4]  Ronald R. Yager A Foundation for a Theory of Possibility , 1980, Cybern. Syst..

[5]  G. Choquet Theory of capacities , 1954 .

[6]  Josef Hadar,et al.  Rules for Ordering Uncertain Prospects , 1969 .

[7]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Possibility Theory - An Approach to Computerized Processing of Uncertainty , 1988 .

[8]  Songsak Sriboonchitta,et al.  Stochastic Dominance and Applications to Finance, Risk and Economics , 2017 .

[9]  Mariano Eriz Aggregation Functions: A Guide for Practitioners , 2010 .

[10]  Edward Beltrami,et al.  Uncertainty and Information , 2020, What Is Random?.

[11]  S. Rachev,et al.  Orderings and Probability Functionals Consistent with Preferences , 2009 .

[12]  R. Mesiar Choquet-like Integrals , 1995 .

[13]  M. Chapman Findlay,et al.  Stochastic dominance : an approach to decision-making under risk , 1978 .

[14]  Naif Alajlan,et al.  Probability weighted means as surrogates for stochastic dominance in decision making , 2014, Knowl. Based Syst..

[15]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  Stochastic Dominance for Measure Based Uncertain Decision Making , 2014, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[16]  R. G. Vickson,et al.  A Unified Approach to Stochastic Dominance , 1975 .

[17]  Radko Mesiar,et al.  A Universal Integral as Common Frame for Choquet and Sugeno Integral , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[18]  George J. Klir,et al.  Uncertainty and Information: Emergence of Vast New Territories , 2006 .

[19]  G. Klir,et al.  Generalized Measure Theory , 2008 .