Story grammars versus story points

Abstract Story grammars have been proposed as a means of expressing a theory of stories. Story grammarians claim that stories are a linguistic form in much the same sense that sentences are, and that we can attribute constituent structure to stories in much the same way we attribute it to sentences. Just as sentences and their constituent structure can be characterized by sentence grammars, so stories and their constituent structure can be characterized by a story grammar. However, the analogy between story grammars and sentence grammars is ill conceived. It is based on a category error that assumes stories to be textual entities like sentences. This is demonstrably not the case. Moreover, this confusion is the cause of most of the misunderstandings about story grammars and what they can accomplish. Once this mistake is acknowledged, the possible contribution of story grammars to a theory of stories is considerably diminished. In place of story grammars, I propose the rudiments of a theory, called the theory of story points. Although it lacks some of the aesthetic appeal of story grammars, the theory of story points seems a more promising route to a meaningful theory of stories. The theory is being used as a component of a computer story-understanding system under development at Berkeley. In addition, some very preliminary experiments conducted on the basis of this approach seem to lend it some psychological plausibility.

[1]  HighWire Press Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London , 1781, The London Medical Journal.

[2]  Stith Thompson,et al.  Motif-index of folk-literature : a classification of narrative elements in folk tales, ballads, myths, fables, mediaeval romances, exempla, fabliaux, jest-books, and local legends , 1935 .

[3]  B. R. Gomulicki Recall as an abstractive process , 1956 .

[4]  Vladimir Propp,et al.  Morphology of the folktale , 1959 .

[5]  John von Neumann,et al.  The Computer and the Brain , 1960 .

[6]  Travaux linguistiques de Prague , 1966 .

[7]  Robert A. Boakes,et al.  Prompted recall of sentences , 1967 .

[8]  Arthur L. Blumenthal,et al.  Promoted recall of sentences. , 1967 .

[9]  Charles J. Fillmore,et al.  THE CASE FOR CASE. , 1967 .

[10]  C. Jung The Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious , 1968 .

[11]  T. Todorov La grammaire du rcit , 1968 .

[12]  J. Helm,et al.  Essays on the verbal and visual arts , 1968 .

[13]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[14]  Charles Mauron,et al.  Aesthetics and Psychology , 1970 .

[15]  Emmon W. Bach,et al.  Universals in Linguistic Theory , 1970 .

[16]  L. Vygotsky,et al.  The psychology of art , 1972 .

[17]  Murray S. Davis,et al.  That's Interesting! , 1971 .

[18]  G. Lakoff Structural Complexity in Fairy Tales , 1972 .

[19]  John B. Carroll,et al.  Language comprehension and the acquisition of knowledge , 1972 .

[20]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  Conceptual dependency: A theory of natural language understanding , 1972 .

[21]  V. Dijk,et al.  Some Aspects Of Text Grammars , 1972 .

[22]  Zum Textbegriff in der heutigen Linguistik , 1973 .

[23]  C. Brémond Logique du récit , 1973 .

[24]  B. Colby A Partial Grammar of Eskimo Folktales1 , 1973 .

[25]  Robert-Alain de Beaugrande,et al.  Einfuhrung in die Textlinguistik , 1973 .

[26]  Zenon W. Pylyshyn,et al.  What the Mind’s Eye Tells the Mind’s Brain: A Critique of Mental Imagery , 1973 .

[27]  Marvin Minsky,et al.  A framework for representing knowledge , 1974 .

[28]  R. Bauman,et al.  Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking , 1975 .

[29]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Comprehension and recall of text as a function of content variables , 1975 .

[30]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Comment on se rappelle et on resume des histoires (How We Remember and Summarize Stories). , 1975 .

[31]  C. Perfetti,et al.  Discourse functions of thematization and topicalization , 1975 .

[32]  H. Grice Logic and conversation , 1975 .

[33]  B. Meyer The organization of prose and its effects on memory , 1975 .

[34]  D. Rumelhart NOTES ON A SCHEMA FOR STORIES , 1975 .

[35]  Christopher K. Riesbeck,et al.  Comprehension by computer : expectation-based analysis of sentences in context , 1976 .

[36]  James R. Meehan,et al.  The Metanovel: Writing Stories by Computer , 1976, Outstanding Dissertations in the Computer Sciences.

[37]  V. Dijk,et al.  Philosophy of action and theory of narrative , 1976 .

[38]  W. Chafe Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view , 1976 .

[39]  N. S. Johnson,et al.  Remembrance of things parsed: Story structure and recall , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[40]  Richard Edward Cullingford,et al.  Script application: computer understanding of newspaper stories. , 1977 .

[41]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Rating the Importance of Structural Units of Prose Passages: A Problem of Metacognitive Development. , 1977 .

[42]  M. Just,et al.  Cognitive processes in comprehension , 1977 .

[43]  P. Thorndyke Cognitive structures in comprehension and memory of narrative discourse , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[44]  Robert Wilensky,et al.  A goal-directed production system for story understanding , 1977, SGAR.

[45]  H. H. Clark Psychology and language , 1977 .

[46]  Chuck Rieger,et al.  GRIND‐1: First report on the magic grinder story comprehension project∗ , 1978 .

[47]  Meir Sternberg,et al.  Expositional Modes and Temporal Ordering in Fiction , 1978 .

[48]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Toward a model of text comprehension and production. , 1978 .

[49]  Robert Wilensky,et al.  Understanding Goal-Based Stories , 1978, Outstanding Dissertations in the Computer Sciences.

[50]  Jaime G. Carbonell,et al.  POLITICS: Automated Ideological Reasoning , 1978, Cogn. Sci..

[51]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Cognitive Psychology and Discourse: Recalling and Summarizing Stories , 1978 .

[52]  Nancy L. Stein,et al.  The development of prose comprehension skills , 1978 .

[53]  W. Kintsch,et al.  The role of culture‐specific schemata in the comprehension and recall of stories∗ , 1978 .

[54]  Mandler JeanM. A code in the node: The use of a story schema in retrieval , 1978 .

[55]  Robert Wilensky,et al.  A GOAL-DIRECTED PRODUCTION SYSTEM FOR STORY UNDERSTANDING1 , 1978 .

[56]  Eugene Charniak,et al.  On the Use of Framed Knowledge in Language Comprehension , 1978, Artif. Intell..

[57]  R. Glaser Advances in Instructional Psychology , 1978 .

[58]  S. Chatman,et al.  Story and Discourse , 2019 .

[59]  Nancy L. Stein,et al.  The effects of organization and instructional set on story memory , 1978 .

[60]  V. Dijk Recalling and Summarizing Complex Discourse , 1979 .

[61]  Bruce K. Britton,et al.  Use of cognitive capacity in reading identical texts with different amounts of discourse level meaning. , 1979 .

[62]  Charles N. Li,et al.  Subject and topic , 1979 .

[63]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  Interestingness: Controlling Inferences , 1979, Artif. Intell..

[64]  Robert de Beaugrande,et al.  Narrative Models of Action and Interaction , 1979, Cogn. Sci..

[65]  Robert Wilensky,et al.  An Evaluation of Story Grammars , 1979 .

[66]  R. Freedle New directions in discourse processing , 1980 .

[67]  W. Burghardt,et al.  Text processing , 1979 .

[68]  William F. Brewer,et al.  Memory for goal-directed events , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[69]  Uta M. Quasthoff Erzählen in Gesprächen , 1980 .

[70]  V. Dijk,et al.  Story comprehension: An introduction , 1980 .

[71]  Karl Haberlandt,et al.  Story grammar and reading time of story constituents , 1980 .

[72]  A. Dundes The Morphology of North American Indian Folktales , 1980 .

[73]  Jean M. Mandler,et al.  On Throwing Out the Baby with the Bathwater: A Reply to Black and Wilensky's Evaluation of Story Grammars , 1980, Cogn. Sci..

[74]  G. Genette,et al.  Narrative Discourse, an Essay in Method. , 1980 .

[75]  William F. Brewer,et al.  Event schemas, story schemas, and story grammars , 1980 .

[76]  W. Kintsch Learning from text, levels of comprehension, or: Why anyone would read a story anyway , 1980 .

[77]  John B. Black,et al.  STORY UNDERSTANDING AS PROBLEM-SOLVING * , 1980 .

[78]  W. Chafe The Pear Stories: Cognitive, Cultural and Linguistic Aspects of Narrative Production , 1980 .

[79]  David E. Rumelhart,et al.  On Evaluating Story Grammars , 1980, Cogn. Sci..

[80]  Konrad Ehlich Erzählen im Alltag , 1980 .

[81]  Donald Perlis,et al.  A Re-Evaluation of Story Grammars , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[82]  Donald A. Waterman,et al.  Pattern-Directed Inference Systems , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[83]  Wendy G. Lehnert Plot Units and Narrative Summarization , 1981 .

[84]  Perry W. Thorndyke,et al.  An Evaluation of Alternative Functional Models of Narrative Schemata , 1981 .

[85]  Donald Perlis,et al.  Language, computation, and reality , 1981 .

[86]  G. C. Young,et al.  Processing of information about self by neurotics. , 1981, The British journal of clinical psychology.

[87]  A. Graesser Prose Comprehension Beyond the Word , 1981 .

[88]  W. P. Dickson,et al.  Children's oral communication skills , 1981 .

[89]  Jill Fitzgerald Whaley,et al.  Readers' Expectations for Story Structures. , 1981 .

[90]  Jerome A. Feldman,et al.  Connectionist Models and Their Properties , 1982, Cogn. Sci..

[91]  J. Mandler Some uses and abuses of a story grammar , 1982 .

[92]  N. Smith Mutual Knowledge , 1982 .

[93]  Nancy L. Stein,et al.  Story structure versus content in children's recall , 1982 .

[94]  John B. Black,et al.  Processing and structural models of comprehension , 1982 .

[95]  Maryanne Martin Working Memory and Contextual Processing in Reading , 1982 .

[96]  Richard C. Omanson,et al.  An analysis of narratives: Identifying central, supportive, and distracting content∗ , 1982 .

[97]  William F. Brewer Plan Understanding, Narrative Comprehension, and Story Schemas , 1982, AAAI.

[98]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Language and comprehension , 1982 .

[99]  B. Bergum,et al.  Attention and performance IX , 1982 .

[100]  Nancy L. Stein,et al.  The definition of a story , 1982 .

[101]  Bruce K. Britton,et al.  Effects of prior knowledge on use of cognitive capacity in three complex cognitive tasks. , 1982 .

[102]  William F. Brewer,et al.  Stories Are to Entertain: A Structural-Affect Theory of Stories. Technical Report No. 265. , 1982 .

[103]  Gerald Prince,et al.  Narratology: The Form and Functioning of Narrative , 1982 .

[104]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  What's the point? , 1982 .

[105]  Jane Oakhill,et al.  Referential continuity and the coherence of discourse , 1982, Cognition.

[106]  Eva Hajicová,et al.  The Role of the Hierarchy of Activation in the Process of Natural Language Understanding , 1982, COLING.

[107]  J. Mandler,et al.  On the psychological validity of story structure , 1982 .

[108]  Michael G. Dyer,et al.  Question Answering for Narrative Memory , 1982 .

[109]  Wendy G. Lehnert,et al.  Strategies for Natural Language Processing , 1982 .

[110]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Strategies of discourse comprehension , 1986 .

[111]  Michael G. Dyer,et al.  The Role of Affect in Narratives , 1983, Cogn. Sci..

[112]  C SchankRoger,et al.  Dynamic Memory: A Theory of Reminding and Learning in Computers and People , 1983 .

[113]  Margaret King,et al.  Parsing Natural Language , 1983 .

[114]  M. Dyer In-Depth Understanding: A Computer Model of Integrated Processing for Narrative Comprehension , 1983 .

[115]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Macrorules for summarizing texts: the development of expertise , 1983 .

[116]  P. Johnson-Laird Mental models , 1989 .

[117]  Jeroen Groenendijk,et al.  Formal methods in the study of language , 1983 .

[118]  Barbara H. Partee,et al.  Quantification, Pronouns, and VP Anaphora , 1984 .