Exploring Models in the Biology Classroom

Abstract Models are simplified representations of more complex systems that help scientists structure the knowledge they acquire. As such, they are ubiquitous and invaluable in scientific research and communication. Because science education strives to make classroom activities more closely reflect science in practice, models have become integral teaching and learning tools woven throughout the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS). Although model-based learning and curriculum are not novel in educational theory, only recently has modeling taken center stage in K-12 national standards for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) classes. We present a variety of examples to outline the importance of various types of models and the practice of modeling in biological research, as well as the emphasis of NGSS on their use in both classroom learning and assessment. We then suggest best practices for creating and modifying models in the context of student-driven inquiry and demonstrate that even subtle incorporation of modeling into existing science curricula can help achieve student learning outcomes, particularly for English-language learners. In closing, we express the value of models and modeling in life beyond the classroom and research laboratory, and highlight the critical importance of “model literacy” for the next generation of scientists, engineers, and problem-solvers.

[1]  F. Crick,et al.  Molecular Structure of Nucleic Acids: A Structure for Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid , 1953, Nature.

[2]  J. Platt Strong Inference: Certain systematic methods of scientific thinking may produce much more rapid progress than others. , 1964, Science.

[3]  M. Herron,et al.  The Nature of Scientific Enquiry , 1971, The School Review.

[4]  J. Estes,et al.  Sea Otters: Their Role in Structuring Nearshore Communities , 1974, Science.

[5]  F. Crick,et al.  Molecular Structure of Nucleic Acids: A Structure for Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid , 1974, Nature.

[6]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness , 1985 .

[7]  J. Monod,et al.  Genetic regulatory mechanisms in the synthesis of proteins. , 1961, Journal of Molecular Biology.

[8]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article HOW DIAGRAMS CAN IMPROVE REASONING , 2022 .

[9]  Karl A. Smith,et al.  How to Model It: Problem Solving for the Computer Age , 1994 .

[10]  Peter Rillero,et al.  Perspectives of Hands-On Science Teaching. , 1994 .

[11]  Norman L. Webb,et al.  Determining Alignment of Expectations and Assessments in Mathematics and Science Education. , 1997 .

[12]  Janice D. Gobert,et al.  Introduction to model-based teaching and learning in science education , 2000 .

[13]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  An Investigation of Software Scaffolds Supporting Modeling Practices , 2002 .

[14]  Chris Dede,et al.  Model-Based Teaching and Learning with BioLogica™: What Do They Learn? How Do They Learn? How Do We Know? , 2004 .

[15]  Nancy J. Nersessian,et al.  Conceptual change in science and in science education , 1989, Synthese.

[16]  Daniel D. Garcia,et al.  Kinesthetic learning in the classroom , 2004 .

[17]  Daniel D. Garcia,et al.  Kinesthetic learning in the classroom , 2004, SIGCSE '04.

[18]  John K. Gilbert,et al.  Models and Modelling: Routes to More Authentic Science Education , 2004 .

[19]  Richard Dufour Learning by Doing: A Handbook for Professional Learning Communities at Work , 2006 .

[20]  J. Platt Strong Inference , 2007 .

[21]  John J. Clement,et al.  Model based learning and instruction in science , 2008 .

[22]  Jessica Thompson,et al.  Beyond the scientific method: Model‐based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations , 2008 .

[23]  B. Reiser,et al.  Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners , 2009 .

[24]  Philip N Johnson-Laird,et al.  INAUGURAL ARTICLE by a Recently Elected Academy Member:Mental models and human reasoning , 2010 .

[25]  Helen R. Quinn,et al.  Language demands and opportunities in relation to Next Generation Science Standards for English language learners: What teachers need to know , 2011 .

[26]  Zacharias C. Zacharia,et al.  Modeling-based learning in science education: cognitive, metacognitive, social, material and epistemological contributions , 2012 .

[27]  Helen R. Quinn,et al.  A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas , 2013 .

[28]  Michelle K. Smith,et al.  Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  M. Caballero,et al.  Bridging Physics and Biology Teaching through Modeling , 2013, 1308.3517.

[30]  Sarah L. Eddy,et al.  Getting Under the Hood: How and for Whom Does Increasing Course Structure Work? , 2014, CBE life sciences education.

[31]  Mark Windschitl,et al.  Ambitious Science Teaching , 2018 .