Changes over time in near‐saturated hydraulic conductivity of peat soil following reclamation for agriculture

Reclamation of peat bogs for agriculture changes the physical and chemical characteristics of the peat matrix, for example, drainage and tillage accelerate decomposition, altering peat porosity, pore size distribution, and hydraulic properties. This study investigated changes in near‐saturated hydraulic conductivity over time after drainage of peat soil for agricultural use by conducting tension infiltrometer measurements in a mire that has been gradually drained and reclaimed for agriculture during the past 80 years (with fields drained 2, 12, 40, and 80 years before the measurements). At pore water pressure closest to saturation (pressure head −1 cm), hydraulic conductivity in the newest field was approximately nine times larger than that in the oldest field, and a decreasing trend with field age was observed. A similar (but weaker) trend was observed with −3 cm pressure head (approximately four times larger in the newest field in comparison to the oldest), but at −6 cm head, there were no significant differences. These results indicate that peat degradation reduces the amount of millimetre‐sized pores in particular. They also indicate that changes in peat macroporosity continue for several decades before a new steady state is reached.

[1]  Richard Cuthbertson,et al.  Routines as drivers of adaptation, incremental change and transformation , 2018, Academy of Management Proceedings.

[2]  W. Quinton,et al.  Structure of peat soils and implications for water storage, flow and solute transport: A review update for geochemists , 2016 .

[3]  D. Hallema,et al.  Characterization of Water Retention Curves for a Series of Cultivated Histosols , 2015 .

[4]  G. Sun,et al.  Long‐Term Effects of Peatland Cultivation on Soil Physical and Hydraulic Properties: Case Study in Canada , 2015 .

[5]  P. Moore,et al.  Multi‐decadal water table manipulation alters peatland hydraulic structure and moisture retention , 2015 .

[6]  J. Holden,et al.  Fire decreases near‐surface hydraulic conductivity and macropore flow in blanket peat , 2014 .

[7]  J. Moeys,et al.  Influence of soil, land use and climatic factors on the hydraulic conductivity of soil , 2013 .

[8]  F. Rezanezhad,et al.  The effects of dual porosity on transport and retardation in peat: A laboratory experiment , 2012 .

[9]  J. Holden,et al.  Near‐surface macropore flow and saturated hydraulic conductivity in drained and restored blanket peatlands , 2011 .

[10]  T. Elliot,et al.  Influence of pore size and geometry on peat unsaturated hydraulic conductivity computed from 3D computed tomography image analysis , 2010 .

[11]  C. Kechavarzi,et al.  Physical properties of low-lying agricultural peat soils in England , 2010 .

[12]  David E. Elrick,et al.  Examining the effect of pore size distribution and shape on flow through unsaturated peat using computed tomography , 2009 .

[13]  R. Heck,et al.  Measuring physical and hydraulic properties of peat from X-ray tomography , 2009 .

[14]  William L. Quinton,et al.  Peat hydraulic conductivity in cold regions and its relation to pore size and geometry , 2008 .

[15]  J. Kruse,et al.  A modified method for measuring saturated hydraulic conductivity and anisotropy of fen peat samples , 2008, Wetlands.

[16]  S. Carey,et al.  Field and laboratory estimates of pore size properties and hydraulic characteristics for subarctic organic soils , 2007 .

[17]  K. Schwärzel,et al.  Hood Infiltrometer—A New Type of Tension Infiltrometer , 2007 .

[18]  J. Holden,et al.  Impact of land drainage on peatland hydrology. , 2006, Journal of environmental quality.

[19]  T. Laurila,et al.  Annual CO2 exchange of a peat field growing spring barley or perennial forage grass , 2004 .

[20]  A. Heathwaite,et al.  Anisotropy and depth‐related heterogeneity of hydraulic conductivity in a bog peat. I: laboratory measurements , 2003 .

[21]  R. Ploeg,et al.  A review on recent developments in soil water retention theory: interfacial tension and temperature effects , 2002 .

[22]  J. Zeitz,et al.  Irreversible Loss of Organic Soil Functions after Reclamation , 2002 .

[23]  N. Cox,et al.  Macroporosity and infiltration in blanket peat: the implications of tension disc infiltrometer measurements , 2001 .

[24]  D. Gray,et al.  Subsurface drainage from hummock-covered hillslopes in the Arctic tundra , 2000 .

[25]  A. Baird.  FIELD ESTIMATION OF MACROPORE FUNCTIONING AND SURFACE HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY IN A FEN PEAT , 1997 .

[26]  Peter H. Westfall,et al.  Multiple Testing of General Contrasts Using Logical Constraints and Correlations , 1997 .

[27]  J. Price,et al.  A field-scale, natural gradient solute transport experiment in peat at a Newfoundland blanket bog , 1995 .

[28]  I. Messing,et al.  Temporal variation in the hydraulic conductivity of a tilled clay soil as measured by tension infiltrometers , 1993 .

[29]  Mushtaque Ahmed,et al.  Simple field method for determining unsaturated hydraulic conductivity , 1991 .

[30]  I. White,et al.  Designs for disc permeameters , 1988 .

[31]  Mark D. Ankeny,et al.  Design for an Automated Tension Infiltrometer , 1988 .

[32]  S. P. Mathur,et al.  COMPARISON OF 13C CPMAS NMR AND CHEMICAL TECHNIQUES FOR MEASURING THE DEGREE OF DECOMPOSITION IN VIRGIN AND CULTIVATED PEAT PROFILES , 1987 .

[33]  G. E. Lang,et al.  Fe, Al, Mn, and S chemistry of Sphagnum peat in four peatlands with different metal and sulfur input , 1986 .

[34]  R. Wooding,et al.  Steady Infiltration from a Shallow Circular Pond , 1968 .

[35]  J. Mckeague,et al.  DITHIONITE- AND OXALATE-EXTRACTABLE Fe AND Al AS AIDS IN DIFFERENTIATING VARIOUS CLASSES OF SOILS , 1966 .

[36]  Ingmar Messing,et al.  Near‐Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity in Soils of Contrasting Texture Measured by Tension Infiltrometers , 1995 .

[37]  A. Heathwaite,et al.  Physical processes and properties of mires. , 1993 .