Open Constraint Satisfaction

Traditionally, constraint satisfaction has been applied in closed-world scenarios, where all choices and constraints are known from the beginning and fixed. With the Internet, many of the traditional CSP applications in resource allocation, scheduling and planning pose themselves in open-world settings, where choices and constraints are to be discovered from different servers in a network.We examine how such a distributed setting affects changes the assumptions underlying most CSP algorithms, and show how solvers can be augmented with an information gathering component that allows open-world constraint satisfaction. We report on experiments that show strong performance of such methods over others where gathering information and solving the CSP are separated.

[1]  James C. French,et al.  Metrics for evaluating database selection techniques , 2004, World Wide Web.

[2]  Marian H. Nodine,et al.  Agent-based semantic interoperability in infosleuth , 1999, SGMD.

[3]  Eugene C. Freuder,et al.  Extracting Constraint Satisfaction Subproblems , 1995, IJCAI.

[4]  Toby Walsh,et al.  Encodings of Non-Binary Constraint Satisfaction Problems , 1999, AAAI/IAAI.

[5]  Craig A. Knoblock,et al.  Flexible and scalable cost-based query planning in mediators: A transformational approach , 2000, Artif. Intell..

[6]  Charles J. Petrie,et al.  On the Equivalence of Constraint Satisfaction Problems , 1990, ECAI.

[7]  Monique Calisti,et al.  CCL: expressions of choice in agent communication , 2000, Proceedings Fourth International Conference on MultiAgent Systems.

[8]  Christian Bessiere,et al.  Arc-Consistency in Dynamic Constraint Satisfaction Problems , 1991, AAAI.

[9]  Patrick Prosser,et al.  HYBRID ALGORITHMS FOR THE CONSTRAINT SATISFACTION PROBLEM , 1993, Comput. Intell..

[10]  Matthias Klusch,et al.  Larks: Dynamic Matchmaking Among Heterogeneous Software Agents in Cyberspace , 2002, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[11]  Makoto Yokoo,et al.  Asynchronous Weak-commitment Search for Solving Distributed Constraint Satisfaction Problems , 1995, CP.

[12]  Katia Sycara,et al.  In-Context Information Management through Adaptive Collaboration of Intelligent Agents , 1999 .

[13]  Katia P. Sycara,et al.  Middle-Agents for the Internet , 1997, IJCAI.

[14]  Nikos Mamoulis,et al.  Solving Non-binary CSPs Using the Hidden Variable Encoding , 2001, CP.

[15]  Suzanne M. Embury,et al.  The Evolving Role of Constraints in the Functional Data Model , 1999, Journal of Intelligent Information Systems.

[16]  Joann J. Ordille,et al.  Querying Heterogeneous Information Sources Using Source Descriptions , 1996, VLDB.

[17]  Michael R. Genesereth,et al.  Infomaster: an information integration system , 1997, SIGMOD '97.

[18]  Jay Budzik,et al.  Supporting on-line resource discovery in the context of ongoing tasks with proactive software assistants , 2002, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[19]  Marian H. Nodine,et al.  Active Information Gathering in InfoSleuth , 1999, CODAS.

[20]  Jennifer Widom,et al.  The TSIMMIS Project: Integration of Heterogeneous Information Sources , 1994, IPSJ.

[21]  Evelina Lamma,et al.  Constraint Propagation and Value Acquisition: Why we should do it Interactively , 1999, IJCAI.

[22]  Makoto Yokoo,et al.  Asynchronous Weak-Commitment Search for Solving Large-Scale Distributed Constraint Satisfaction Problems , 1995, ICMAS.

[23]  Brian Falkenhainer,et al.  Dynamic Constraint Satisfaction Problems , 1990, AAAI.

[24]  Pattie Maes,et al.  Just-in-time information retrieval agents , 2000, IBM Syst. J..

[25]  James A. Larson,et al.  Federated Database Systems , 1999 .

[26]  J L KempGraham,et al.  The Evolving Role of Constraints in the Functional Data Model , 1999 .

[27]  Tomasz Ksiezyk,et al.  Intelligent Integration of Information. , 2000 .