The Challenging But Promising Future of Industrial Relations: Developing Theory and Method in Context-Sensitive Research

Industrial relations (IR) in the UK are often seen as being in a state of some disarray. Yet analytical advances can also be detected. This article takes one part of IR, context-sensitive research, to suggest ways of building on such advances. Its focus is the intellectual core of the subject, and not its institutional position. The particular route identified is to link IR to the programme of critical realism and thereby to make methodological progress and strengthen links with social science. Policy relevance may also be enhanced. Whether IR's possibilities are realised remains uncertain, and whether an intellectual programme leads to institutional advance is even harder to predict.

[1]  J. Driffill,et al.  Bargaining structure, corporatism and macroeconomic performance , 1988 .

[2]  B. Towers.  Dons, Dockers and Miners Alike … Industrial Relations and the Irj, 1970-2002 , 2003 .

[3]  Francis Green,et al.  It’s Been A Hard Day’s Night: The Concentration and Intensification of Work in Late Twentieth-Century Britain , 2001 .

[4]  J. Rubery.  Wages and the Labour Market , 1997 .

[5]  P. Ackers.  Reframing Employment Relations: The Case for Neo-Pluralism , 2002 .

[6]  Michael Rowlinson,et al.  Journal Rankings in Business and Management and the 2001 Research Assessment Exercise in the UK , 2004 .

[7]  J. Wajcman.  Feminism Facing Industrial Relations in Britain , 2000 .

[8]  G. Strauss,et al.  Methods Matter: Changes in Industrial Relations Research and their Implications , 2000 .

[9]  P. Edwards.  From Industrial Relations to the Employment Relationship: The Development of Research in Britain , 1995 .

[10]  R. Hyman.  Strategy or Structure? Capital, Labour and Control , 1987 .

[11]  D. Grimshaw.  Changing Pay Systems, Occupational Concentration and the Gender Pay Gap , 2001 .

[12]  David Winchester.  INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS RESEARCH IN BRITAIN , 1983 .

[13]  E. Heery,et al.  The Insecure Workforce , 2000 .

[14]  A. Ferner,et al.  Between Globalization and Capitalist Variety: Multinationals and the International Diffusion of Employment Relations , 2002 .

[15]  G. Bain,et al.  A STRATEGY FOR INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS RESEARCH IN GREAT BRITAIN , 1974 .

[16]  Bill Harley,et al.  Team Membership and the Experience of Work in Britain: An Analysis of the WERS98 Data , 2001 .

[17]  Paul Thompson,et al.  Redesigning production through teamworking: Case studies from the Volvo Truck Corporation , 1996 .

[18]  Huw Beynon,et al.  Managing Employment Change , 2002 .

[19]  G. Bonazzi.  Between Shock Absorption and Continuous Improvement: Supervisors and Technicians in Fiat `Integrated Factory' , 1998 .

[20]  Adrian John Wilkinson,et al.  Bouquets, Brickbats and Blinkers: Total Quality Management and Employee Involvement in Practice , 1997 .

[21]  Anthony Dobbins,et al.  Teamworking: a new dynamic in the pursuit of management control , 2001 .

[22]  E. Ogbonna,et al.  The False Promise of Organizational Culture Change: A Case Study of Middle Managers in Grocery Retailing* , 2003 .

[23]  Paul Marginson,et al.  All Benchmarkers Now? Benchmarking and the 'Europeanisation' of Industrial Relations , 2002 .

[24]  L. Ortiz.  Union Response to Teamwork: the Case of Opel Spain , 1998 .

[25]  I. Kessler,et al.  Individualism and Collectivism in Industrial Relations , 2003 .

[26]  The Dynamics of Employee Relations , 1999 .

[27]  John Mingers,et al.  The contribution of critical realism as an underpinning philosophy for OR/MS and systems , 2000, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[28]  Monder Ram,et al.  Praising Caesar Not Burying Him: What We Know about Employment Relations in Small Firms , 2003 .

[29]  Peter Nolan,et al.  Mapping the Future of Work , 2003 .

[30]  R. Locke,et al.  Apples and Oranges Revisited: Contextualized Comparisons and the Study of Comparative Labor Politics , 1995 .

[31]  Monder Ram,et al.  Pay Determination in Small Firms in the UK: The Case of the Response to the National Minimum Wage , 2002 .

[32]  F. Traxler.  Coordinated Bargaining: A Stocktaking of its Preconditions, Practices and Performance , 2003 .

[33]  Vincent J. Roscigno,et al.  The Organizational and Social Foundations of Worker Resistance , 2004 .

[34]  S. Wijnbergen.  Mexico and the Brady plan , 1991 .

[35]  Adrian John Wilkinson,et al.  Understanding the Meaning of Participation: Views from the Workplace , 1994 .

[36]  A. Pollert.  Gender and Class Revisited; or, the Poverty of `Patriarchy' , 1996 .

[37]  James L. Medoff,et al.  What Do Unions Do , 1986 .

[38]  J. Purcell.  THE MANAGEMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS IN THE MODERN CORPORATION: AGENDA FOR RESEARCH , 1983 .

[39]  John M. Berridge,et al.  The British Universities Industrial Relations Association: the first 35 years , 1988 .

[40]  N. D. Pidgen,et al.  The Comparative Method , 1987 .

[41]  David Soskice,et al.  Reinterpreting Corporatism and Explaining Unemployment: Co-ordinated and Non-co-ordinated Market Economies , 1990 .

[42]  J. Rubery.  The British production regime: a societal-specific system? , 1994 .

[43]  Bruce E. Kaufman.  John R. Commons and the Wisconsin School on Industrial Relations Strategy and Policy , 2003 .

[44]  E. Ogbonna,et al.  The false promise of organizational culture change , 2000 .

[45]  F. Green.  The Demands of Work , 2003 .

[46]  The Inadequacy of Mainstream Theories ofTrade Union Behaviour , 1999 .

[47]  Susan Helper,et al.  Economists and Field Research: "You Can Observe a Lot Just by Watching." , 2000 .

[48]  D. Metcalf.  The National Minimum Wage: Coverage, Impact and Future , 2002 .

[49]  P. Thompson.  Disconnected Capitalism: Or Why Employers Can't Keep Their Side of the Bargain , 2003 .