Three rules for bone adaptation to mechanical stimuli.

The primary mechanical function of bones is to provide rigid levers for muscles to pull against, and to remain as light as possible to allow efficient locomotion. To accomplish this bones must adapt their shape and architecture to make efficient use of material. Bone adaptation during skeletal growth and development continuously adjusts skeletal mass and architecture to changing mechanical environments. There are three fundamental rules that govern bone adaptation: (1) It is driven by dynamic, rather than static, loading. (2) Only a short duration of mechanical loading is necessary to initiate an adaptive response. (3) Bone cells accommodate to a customary mechanical loading environment, making them less responsive to routine loading signals. From these rules, several mathematical equations can be derived that provide simple parametric models for bone adaptation.

[1]  L E Lanyon,et al.  Direct transformation from quiescence to bone formation in the adult periosteum following a single brief period of bone loading , 1988, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[2]  D P Fyhrie,et al.  Trabecular bone density and loading history: regulation of connective tissue biology by mechanical energy. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  C T Rubin,et al.  Promotion of bony ingrowth by frequency-specific, low-amplitude mechanical strain. , 1994, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[4]  H J Donahue,et al.  Cell‐to‐cell communication in osteoblastic networks: Cell line–dependent hormonal regulation of gap junction function , 1995, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[5]  J. Ferrier,et al.  Propagation of a calcium pulse between osteoblastic cells. , 1992, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[6]  L. Lanyon,et al.  Limb mechanics as a function of speed and gait: a study of functional strains in the radius and tibia of horse and dog. , 1982, The Journal of experimental biology.

[7]  J A Frangos,et al.  Activation of G proteins mediates flow-induced prostaglandin E2 production in osteoblasts. , 1997, Endocrinology.

[8]  J. Wolff Das Gesetz der Transformation der Knochen , 1893 .

[9]  J Y Rho,et al.  Mechanical loading thresholds for lamellar and woven bone formation , 1994, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[10]  H. Frost Skeletal structural adaptations to mechanical usage (SATMU): 2. Redefining Wolff's Law: The remodeling problem , 1990, The Anatomical record.

[11]  C H Turner,et al.  Homeostatic control of bone structure: an application of feedback theory. , 1991, Bone.

[12]  I. Owan,et al.  Mechanotransduction in bone: role of strain rate. , 1995, The American journal of physiology.

[13]  Farshid Guilak,et al.  Correlation of bony ingrowth to the distribution of stress and strain parameters surrounding a porous‐coated implant , 1996, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[14]  R. T. Hart,et al.  Functional adaptation in long bones: establishing in vivo values for surface remodeling rate coefficients. , 1985, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  J. Hert,et al.  Reaction of bone to mechanical stimuli , 1972 .

[16]  M. Lišková,et al.  Reaction of bone to mechanical stimuli. 2. Periosteal and endosteal reaction of tibial diaphysis in rabbit to intermittent loading. , 1971, Folia morphologica.

[17]  J. Bertram,et al.  Bone curvature: sacrificing strength for load predictability? , 1988, Journal of theoretical biology.

[18]  David R. Carrier,et al.  Wing bone stresses in free flying bats and the evolution of skeletal design for flight , 1992, Nature.

[19]  Friedrich Pauwels,et al.  Biomechanics of the Locomotor Apparatus , 1980 .

[20]  L E Lanyon,et al.  Static vs dynamic loads as an influence on bone remodelling. , 1984, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  T J Chambers,et al.  Characterization of osteogenic response to mechanical stimulation in cancellous bone of rat caudal vertebrae. , 1993, The American journal of physiology.

[22]  L. Lanyon,et al.  The influence of strain rate on adaptive bone remodelling. , 1982, Journal of biomechanics.

[23]  G. Beaupré,et al.  An approach for time‐dependent bone modeling and remodeling—application: A preliminary remodeling simulation , 1990, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[24]  H. Frost The Laws of Bone Structure , 1965 .

[25]  Y. Umemura,et al.  Five Jumps per Day Increase Bone Mass and Breaking Force in Rats , 1997, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[26]  J A Frangos,et al.  Fluid flow stimulates rapid and continuous release of nitric oxide in osteoblasts. , 1996, The American journal of physiology.

[27]  H. Frost Bone “mass” and the “mechanostat”: A proposal , 1987, The Anatomical record.

[28]  Harold M. Frost,et al.  Bone "mass" and the "mechanostat" , 1987 .

[29]  D P Fyhrie,et al.  The adaptation of bone apparent density to applied load. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[30]  L E Lanyon,et al.  Strain magnitude related changes in whole bone architecture in growing rats. , 1997, Bone.

[31]  L. Lanyon,et al.  Regulation of bone formation by applied dynamic loads. , 1984, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[32]  M W Otter,et al.  Mechanotransduction in bone: do bone cells act as sensors of fluid flow? , 1994, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[33]  M. Forwood,et al.  Inducible cyclo‐oxygenase (COX‐2) mediates the induction of bone formation by mechanical loading in vivo , 1996, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[34]  S. Cowin,et al.  Mechanotransduction in Bone , 1998 .