Seismic Communication in Anuran AmphibiansWhite-lipped frogs thump the ground as they chirp

eismic communication is the exchange of information using self-generated vibrational signals transmitted via a substrate such as the soil, a plant stem, or even a blade of grass. This communication style affords many advantages for terrestrial animals. By understanding the advantages and limitations of this modality, one may more fully appreciate the selective pressures operating both on the organisms that employ seismic signals and on communication systems as a whole. Seismic communication can take place without light, during day or night. Vibrational signals are most effective over a short range and have only short persistence. Thus they are well-suited for information exchange between nearby conspecifics; there is little danger of detection by distant predators. Due to their comparatively long wavelengths, seismic signals are affected relatively little by obstacles in the soil. This feature of vibrational signals accounts for one of their potential drawbacks: the emitter may be difficult to locate, because phase differences between points on the body surface of a small receiver, such as a frog, would be minimal. Furthermore, there are clear mechanical limits on the upper frequency of seismic signal production, with the result that vertebrate vibratory signals are restricted to frequencies below several

[1]  R. J. Ross,et al.  Detection of substrate vibrations by salamanders: inner ear sense organ activity , 1978 .

[2]  P. Narins,et al.  Analysis of acoustically evoked call suppression behaviour in a neotropical treefrog , 1982, Animal Behaviour.

[3]  P. H. Hartline,et al.  Physiological basis for detection of sound and vibration in snakes. , 1971, The Journal of experimental biology.

[4]  I. Straughan,et al.  Functional aspects of anuran middle ear structures. , 1974, The Journal of experimental biology.

[5]  E. Lewis,et al.  The vertebrate ear as an exquisite seismic sensor. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  Horst Bleckmann,et al.  Prey Identification and Prey Localization in Surface-feeding Fish and Fishing Spiders , 1988 .

[7]  R. J. Ross,et al.  Detection of substrate vibrations by salamanders: Frequency sensitivity of the ear , 1980 .

[8]  D. E. Willis,et al.  The spectrum of seismic noise , 1962 .

[9]  Edwin R. Lewis,et al.  Acute seismic sensitivity in the bullfrog ear , 1982, Brain Research.

[10]  J. Schwartzkopff,et al.  Chapter 6 – MECHANORECEPTION , 1974 .

[11]  Edwin R. Lewis,et al.  Acoustically induced call modification in the white-lipped frog, Leptodactylus albilabris , 1988, Animal Behaviour.

[12]  H. Autrum,et al.  Vergleichende Untersuchungen über den Erschütterungssinn der Insekten , 2004, Zeitschrift für vergleichende Physiologie.

[13]  A. Mcintyre,et al.  Vibration-evoked responses from lamellated corpuscles in the legs of kangaroos , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[14]  J. Randall Individual footdrumming signatures in banner-tailed kangaroo rats Dipodomys spectabilis , 1989, Animal Behaviour.

[15]  R. J. Ross,et al.  Detection of substrate vibrations by salamanders: eighth cranial nerve activity , 1979 .

[16]  T. Hetherington,et al.  Comparative morphology of the amphibian opercularis system: I. General design features and functional interpretation , 1986, Journal of morphology.

[17]  N. Intrator,et al.  Seismic signalling as a means of communication in a subterranean mammal , 1987, Animal Behaviour.

[18]  T. Hetherington Biomechanics of vibration reception in the bullfrog,Rana catesbeiana , 1988, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[19]  T. Hetherington Role of the opercularis muscle in seismic sensitivity in the bullfrog Rana catesbeiana. , 1985, The Journal of experimental zoology.

[20]  Peter M. Narins,et al.  Chorus dynamics of a neotropical amphibian assemblage: comparison of computer simulation and natural behaviour , 1989, Animal Behaviour.

[21]  M. Littlejohn,et al.  Acoustic interaction between two species of leptodactylid frogs , 1969 .

[22]  G. E. Drewry,et al.  Characteristics of an acoustic community: Puerto Rican frogs of the genus Eleutherodactylus , 1983 .