A Microneedle Functionalized with Polyethyleneimine and Nanotubes for Highly Sensitive, Label-Free Quantification of DNA

The accurate measure of DNA concentration is necessary for many DNA-based biological applications. However, the current methods are limited in terms of sensitivity, reproducibility, human error, and contamination. Here, we present a microneedle functionalized with polyethyleneimine (PEI) and single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) for the highly sensitive quantification of DNA. The microneedle was fabricated using ultraviolet (UV) lithography and anisotropic etching, and then functionalized with PEI and SWCNTs through a dip coating process. The electrical characteristics of the microneedle change with the accumulation of DNA on the surface. Current-voltage measurements in deionized water were conducted to study these changes in the electrical properties of the sensor. The sensitivity test found the signal to be discernable from the noise level down to 100 attomolar (aM), demonstrating higher sensitivity than currently available UV fluorescence and UV absorbance based methods. A microneedle without any surface modification only had a 100 femtomolar (fM) sensitivity. All measurement results were consistent with fluorescence microscopy.

[1]  Gang Wu,et al.  Comparison of three common DNA concentration measurement methods. , 2014, Analytical biochemistry.

[2]  H Schimmel,et al.  Detection and traceability of genetically modified organisms in the food production chain. , 2004, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[3]  P. T. Lillehei,et al.  Polymer/Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Films Assembled via Donor−Acceptor Interactions and Their Use as Scaffolds for Silica Deposition , 2004 .

[4]  Jin-Woo Choi,et al.  Improved Dispersion of Carbon Nanotubes in Polymers at High Concentrations , 2012, Nanomaterials.

[5]  I. Willner,et al.  Probing Biomolecular Interactions at Conductive and Semiconductive Surfaces by Impedance Spectroscopy: Routes to Impedimetric Immunosensors, DNA‐Sensors, and Enzyme Biosensors , 2003 .

[6]  José Costa,et al.  PicoGreen quantitation of DNA: effective evaluation of samples pre- or post-PCR , 1996, Nucleic Acids Res..

[7]  Cees Dekker,et al.  Fabrication and characterization of nanopore-based electrodes with radii down to 2 nm. , 2006, Nano letters.

[8]  Cees Dekker,et al.  Individual single-walled carbon nanotubes as nanoelectrodes for electrochemistry. , 2005, Nano letters.

[9]  A Javey,et al.  Polymer functionalization for air-stable n-type carbon nanotube field-effect transistors. , 2001, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[10]  Mark E. Cooper,et al.  Label-free biosensors : techniques and applications , 2009 .

[11]  C. Tîlmaciu,et al.  Carbon nanotube biosensors , 2015, Front. Chem..

[12]  Mark J. Schulz,et al.  Polymer Coating of Carbon Nanotube Fibers for Electric Microcables , 2014, Nanomaterials.

[13]  J. Riu,et al.  Electrochemical sensing based on carbon nanotubes , 2010 .

[14]  Robert J. Brooker.  Genetics : analysis & principles , 2005 .

[15]  Rita T. Lawlor,et al.  DNA Qualification Workflow for Next Generation Sequencing of Histopathological Samples , 2013, PloS one.

[16]  Kong,et al.  Nanotube molecular wires as chemical sensors , 2000, Science.

[17]  Hyun-Boo Lee,et al.  Electrolyte-free Amperometric Immunosensor using a Dendritic Nanotip. , 2013, RSC advances.

[18]  Zbigniew Stojek,et al.  Peer Reviewed: Voltammetric and Amperometric Detection without Added Electrolyte. , 2000 .

[19]  M. Esumi,et al.  Pitfalls of DNA Quantification Using DNA-Binding Fluorescent Dyes and Suggested Solutions , 2016, PloS one.

[20]  M. Ringnér,et al.  Impact of DNA amplification on gene expression patterns in breast cancer. , 2002, Cancer research.