The Dioxin Crisis as Experiment To Determine Poultry-Related Campylobacter Enteritis

In June 1999, the dioxin crisis, caused by dioxin-contaminated feed components, exploded in Belgium, resulting in withdrawal of chicken and eggs from the market. Through the sentinel surveillance system, a decrease in Campylobacter infections during June 1999 was noticed. A model was generated with the reports from preceding years (1994 to 1998), and a prediction of the number of infections in 1999 was calculated. The model shows a significant decline (40%) in the number of infections, mainly because of the withdrawal of poultry. The use of a disaster as an epidemiologic tool offers a unique opportunity to observe exceptional changes in the occurrence of infections or other diseases.

[1]  L. Slutsker,et al.  Sporadic Campylobacter jejuni infections in Hawaii: associations with prior antibiotic use and commercially prepared chicken. , 2001, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[2]  J Baeyens,et al.  The Belgian PCB and dioxin incident of January-June 1999: exposure data and potential impact on health. , 2001, Environmental health perspectives.

[3]  Y. Andersson,et al.  Risk factors for indigenous campylobacter infection: a Swedish case-control study , 2000, Epidemiology and Infection.

[4]  M. Goldacre,et al.  Olive oil, diet and colorectal cancer: an ecological study and a hypothesis , 2000, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[5]  H. Van Oyen.  Dioxin in feed and food: is public health running behind? , 1999, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[6]  C. Hedberg,et al.  Food-related illness and death in the United States. , 1999, Emerging infectious diseases.

[7]  B. Erickson.  Focus: Dioxin food crisis in Belgium. , 1999 .

[8]  B. Erickson.  Dioxin food crisis in Belgium. , 1999, Analytical chemistry.

[9]  N. Garrett,et al.  Campylobacteriosis in New Zealand: results of a case-control study. , 1997, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[10]  S. Schwartz.  The fallacy of the ecological fallacy: the potential misuse of a concept and the consequences. , 1994, American journal of public health.

[11]  S. Ostroff,et al.  Risk factors for sporadic Campylobacter infections: results of a case-control study in southeastern Norway , 1992, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[12]  Louette R. Johnson Lutjens.  Research , 2006 .

[13]  J. Butzler,et al.  Campylobacter: pathogenicity and significance in foods. , 1991, International journal of food microbiology.

[14]  M. B. Skirrow.  Epidemiology of Campylobacter enteritis. , 1991, International journal of food microbiology.

[15]  T. S. Jones,et al.  Campylobacter enteritis at a university: transmission from eating chicken and from cats. , 1987, American journal of epidemiology.

[16]  N. Weiss,et al.  The role of poultry and meats in the etiology of Campylobacter jejuni/coli enteritis. , 1986, American journal of public health.

[17]  J. Oosterom,et al.  Epidemiological investigations on Campylobacter jejuni in households with a primary infection , 1984, Journal of Hygiene.

[18]  G. Istre,et al.  Endemic Campylobacter jejuni infection in Colorado: identified risk factors. , 1984, American journal of public health.

[19]  R. S. Hopkins,et al.  Handling raw chicken as a source for sporadic Campylobacter jejuni infections. , 1983, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[20]  R. Serfling.  Methods for current statistical analysis of excess pneumonia-influenza deaths. , 1963, Public health reports.