Does Exposure to Distraction in an Experimental Setting Impact DriverPerception of Cell Phone Ease of Use and Safety

The authors examined drivers’ perception of the ease and safety of cell phone use while driving before and after exposure to distraction in an experimental setting. During the study, each driver reflected on driving and task performance while engaged in conversation-like and arithmetic distraction tasks on a hands-free and hand-held cell phone. Hands-free phones were consistently rated easier to use and safer than hand-held cell phones by both age groups, despite equivalent decrements in driving performance. Younger drivers consistently rated cell phones to be easier to use and safer than did older drivers. After exposure to distraction, younger drivers’ perception of the ease of use declined relative to their initial ratings; however, there was no corresponding change in the ratings of safety. In contrast, older drivers’ perception of ease or safety did not change significantly post-exposure. A priori subjective ratings on various dimensions of driver skill and distraction were also examined with respect to age-related differences.

[1]  M. Horswill,et al.  DRIVERS' RATINGS OF DIFFERENT COMPONENTS OF THEIR OWN DRIVING SKILL: A GREATER ILLUSION OF SUPERIORITY FOR SKILLS THAT RELATE TO ACCIDENT INVOLVEMENT , 2004 .

[2]  William J. Horrey,et al.  Awareness of Performance Decrements Due to Distraction in Younger and Older Drivers , 2017 .

[3]  Christopher B. Mayhorn,et al.  Perceptions of Driver Distraction by Cellular Phone Users and Nonusers , 2005, Hum. Factors.

[4]  R F Job,et al.  The application of learning theory to driving confidence: the effect of age and the impact of random breath testing. , 1990, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .

[6]  Mathew P White,et al.  Risk Perceptions of Mobile Phone Use While Driving , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[7]  P. Hancock,et al.  Human Mental Workload , 1988 .

[8]  P Delhomme,et al.  Comparing one's driving with others': assessment of abilities and frequency of offences. Evidence for a superior conformity of self-bias? , 1991, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Examining the Impact of Cell Phone Conversations on Driving Using Meta-Analytic Techniques , 2006, Hum. Factors.

[10]  O. Svenson ARE WE ALL LESS RISKY AND MORE SKILLFUL THAN OUR FELLOW DRIVERS , 1981 .

[11]  B Fischhoff,et al.  Perceived driving safety and seatbelt usage. , 1985, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[12]  Teresa Senserrick,et al.  EVALUATION OF AN INSIGHT DRIVER-TRAINING PROGRAM FOR YOUNG DRIVERS , 2001 .

[13]  David L. Strayer,et al.  Driven to Distraction: Dual-Task Studies of Simulated Driving and Conversing on a Cellular Telephone , 2001, Psychological science.

[14]  Monica N. Lees,et al.  The Effect of Insight and Error-Based Feedback on Young Drivers' following Behavior and Confidence , 2004 .

[15]  K A Brookhuis,et al.  The effects of mobile telephoning on driving performance. , 1991, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[16]  T Falkmer,et al.  Effect of drivers' age and push button locations on visual time off road, steering wheel deviation and safety perception , 2006, Ergonomics.

[17]  R F Job,et al.  Motor vehicle accidents, fatigue and optimism bias in taxi drivers. , 1997, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[18]  J. Kruger,et al.  Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.