A coupled FEM/BEM approach and its accuracy for solving crack problems in fracture mechanics

The finite element (FEM) and the boundary element methods (BEM) are well known powerful numerical techniques for solving a wide range of problems in applied science and engineering. Each method has its own advantages and disadvantages, so that it is desirable to develop a combined finite element/boundary element method approach, which makes use of their advantages and reduces their disadvantages. Several coupling techniques are proposed in the literature, but until now the incompatibility of the basic variables remains a problem to be solved. To overcome this problem, a special super-element using boundary elements based on the usual finite element technique of total potential energy minimization has been developed in this paper. The application of the most commonly used approaches in finite element method namely quarter-point elements and J-integrals techniques were examined using the proposed coupling FEM–BEM. The accuracy and efficiency of the proposed approach have been assessed for the evaluation of stress intensity factors (SIF). It was found that the FEM–BEM coupling technique gives more accurate values of the stress intensity factors with fewer degrees of freedom.

[1]  R. Barsoum.  On the use of isoparametric finite elements in linear fracture mechanics , 1976 .

[2]  T. K. Hellen.  On the method of virtual crack extensions , 1975 .

[3]  Mark A Fleming,et al.  ENRICHED ELEMENT-FREE GALERKIN METHODS FOR CRACK TIP FIELDS , 1997 .

[4]  L. P. Harrop.  The optimum size of quarter‐point crack tip elements , 1982 .

[5]  Carlos Alberto Brebbia,et al.  Progress in Boundary Element Methods , 1981 .

[6]  Enrique Alarcón,et al.  The use of direct boundary element method for gaining insight into complex seismic site response , 2005 .

[7]  O. Zienkiewicz,et al.  The coupling of the finite element method and boundary solution procedures , 1977 .

[8]  P. K. Banerjee,et al.  Boundary element methods in engineering science , 1981 .

[9]  Evert C. Lawton,et al.  An iterative finite element-boundary element algorithm , 1996 .

[10]  Carlos Alberto Brebbia,et al.  Boundary Elements: An Introductory Course , 1989 .

[11]  Erdogan Madenci,et al.  Thermoelastic stress field in a piecewise homogeneous domain under non‐uniform temperature using a coupled boundary and finite element method , 2003 .

[12]  Carlos Alberto Brebbia,et al.  Combination of boundary and finite elements in elastostatics , 1979 .

[13]  A. A. Griffith.  The Phenomena of Rupture and Flow in Solids , 1921 .

[14]  Eckart Schnack,et al.  DOMAIN DECOMPOSITION WITH BEM AND FEM , 1997 .

[15]  Herbert A. Mang,et al.  A new method for the coupling of finite element and boundary element discretized subdomains of elastic bodies , 1986 .

[16]  Wael Elleithy,et al.  Iterative coupling of BE and FE methods in elastostatics , 2001 .

[17]  Abhijit Chandra,et al.  An algorithm for handling corners in the boundary element method: Application to conduction-convection equations , 1991 .

[18]  Y. K. Cheung,et al.  The mixed mode problems for the cracks emanating from a circular hole in a finite plate , 1989 .

[19]  Robert A. Adey,et al.  Basic computational techniques for engineers , 1983 .

[20]  P. Hunter,et al.  FEM/BEM NOTES , 2001 .

[21]  R. T. Fenner,et al.  Coupled FEM-BEM for elastoplastic contact problems using Lagrange Multipliers , 2006 .

[22]  C. Brebbia,et al.  Boundary Elements IX , 1987 .

[23]  V. Popov,et al.  An O(N) Taylor series multipole boundary element method for three-dimensional elasticity problems , 2001 .

[24]  J. Rice.  A path-independent integral and the approximate analysis of strain , 1968 .

[25]  C. Balakrishna,et al.  Symmetric coupling of multi‐zone curved Galerkin boundary elements with finite elements in elasticity , 2000 .