Multi-Objective Optimization of a Fluid Structure Interaction Benchmarking

The integration and application of a new multi-objective tabu search optimization algorithm for Fluid Structure Interaction (FSI) problems are presented. The aim is to enhance the computational design process for real world applications and to achieve higher performance of the whole system for the four considered objectives. The described system combines the optimizer with a well established FSI solver which is based on the fully implicit, monolithic formuFlation of the problem in the Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian FEM approach. The proposed solver resolves the proposed fluid-structure interaction benchmark which describes the self-induced elastic deformation of a beam attached to a cylinder in laminar channel flow. The optimized flow characteristics of the aforementioned geometrical arrangement illustrate the performance of the system in two dimensions. Special emphasis is given to the analysis of the simulation package, which is of high accuracy and is the core of application. The design process identifies the best combination of flow features for optimal system behavior and the most important objectives. In addition, the presented methodology has the potential to run in parallel, which will significantly speed-up the elapsed time. Finite Element Method (FEM), Fluid-Structure Interaction (FSI), Multi-Ojective Tabu search (MOTS2). ∗Institute of Applied Mathematics, TU Dortmund, Germany †Cranfield University,MK430AL, Bedfordshire, Department of Power and Propulsion,School of Engineering, UK. ‡Institute of Applied Mathematics, TU Dortmund, Germany §Cranfield University,MK430AL, Bedfordshire, Department of Power and Propulsion,School of Engineering, UK. ¶Cranfield University,MK430AL, Bedfordshire, Department of Power and Propulsion,School of Engineering, UK. ‖Institute of Mathematics, Charles University Prague, Czech Republic

[1]  F. Thomasset Finite element methods for Navier-Stokes equations , 1980 .

[2]  Stefan Turek,et al.  Numerical Benchmarking of Fluid-Structure Interaction: A Comparison of Different Discretization and Solution Approaches , 2011 .

[3]  Mhamed Souli,et al.  Fluid Structure Interaction for Bird Impact Problem: Experimental and Numerical Investigation , 2012 .

[4]  Robert Hooke,et al.  `` Direct Search'' Solution of Numerical and Statistical Problems , 1961, JACM.

[5]  Stefan Turek,et al.  Efficient Solvers for Incompressible Flow Problems - An Algorithmic and Computational Approach , 1999, Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering.

[6]  Pj Clarkson,et al.  Biobjective Design Optimization for Axial Compressors Using Tabu Search , 2008 .

[7]  Ivo F. Sbalzariniy,et al.  Multiobjective optimization using evolutionary algorithms , 2000 .

[8]  John A. Nelder,et al.  A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , 1965, Comput. J..

[9]  Stefan Turek,et al.  Numerical Simulation and Benchmarking of a Monolithic Multigrid Solver for Fluid-Structure Interaction Problems with Application to Hemodynamics , 2011 .

[10]  Pj Clarkson,et al.  Insight into High-quality Aerodynamic Design Spaces through Multi-objective Optimization , 2008 .

[11]  E. Pilo,et al.  Coupled Electromechanical Optimization of Power Transmission Lines , 2008 .

[12]  Giovanni Bernardini,et al.  Multi--Disciplinary Optimization for the Conceptual Design of Innovative Aircraft Configurations , 2006 .

[13]  M. Liou,et al.  Mining of Data from Evolutionary Algorithms for Improving Design Optimization , 2005 .

[14]  Peter Norvig,et al.  Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach , 1995 .

[15]  Riccardo Amirante,et al.  Design Optimization of the Intake of a Small-Scale Turbojet Engine , 2007 .

[16]  P. John Clarkson,et al.  The development of a multi-objective Tabu Search algorithm for continuous optimisation problems , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  Abhishek K Gupta,et al.  Numerical Methods using MATLAB , 2014, Apress.

[18]  Stefan Turek,et al.  A Monolithic FEM/Multigrid Solver for an ALE Formulation of Fluid-Structure Interaction with Applications in Biomechanics , 2006 .

[19]  Jeffrey C. Lagarias,et al.  Convergence Properties of the Nelder-Mead Simplex Method in Low Dimensions , 1998, SIAM J. Optim..

[20]  Timothy A. Davis,et al.  A combined unifrontal/multifrontal method for unsymmetric sparse matrices , 1999, TOMS.

[21]  Carl Tim Kelley,et al.  Iterative methods for optimization , 1999, Frontiers in applied mathematics.

[22]  Stefan Turek,et al.  FEM multigrid techniques for fluid-structure interaction with application to hemodynamics , 2012 .

[23]  P. Pironkov,et al.  Efficient Numerical Simulation and Optimization of Fluid-Structure Interaction , 2011 .

[24]  S. Turek,et al.  Proposal for Numerical Benchmarking of Fluid-Structure Interaction between an Elastic Object and Laminar Incompressible Flow , 2006 .

[25]  Twan Basten,et al.  An algebra of Pareto points , 2005, Fifth International Conference on Application of Concurrency to System Design (ACSD'05).

[26]  Z. Zhu,et al.  Construction of Integral Objective Function/Fitness Function of Multi-Objective/Multi-Disciplinary Optimization , 2004 .

[27]  Rekha Ranjana Rao,et al.  A Newton-Raphson Pseudo-Solid Domain Mapping Technique for Free and Moving Boundary Problems , 1996 .

[28]  Natalia Alexandrov,et al.  Editorial—Multidisciplinary Design Optimization , 2005 .

[29]  Roland Wüchner,et al.  Fluid-Structure Interaction in the Context of Shape Optimization and Computational Wind Engineering , 2011 .