A uniform anthropomorphological approach to the human conception of dimensional relations

Within psycholinguistics, the dimensional conception of space is described through a variety of theoretical constructs, e.g., frames of reference, perspectives, strategies, and patterns. The objective of this paper is to introduce a uniform classification of the alternatives of dimensionally conceiving of object relations, derived from the functional and morphological asymmetries of the human body which define an anthropomorphous Origo, and from our ability to mentally project the Origo into positions and orientations other than we actually occupy. Particularly, the conception of dimensional relations on the first horizontal line is explained through the principle of perceptual accessibility of objects; this allows for the uniform treatment of (almost) all conceptual alternatives from basic psychological principles. Finally, some implications of this anthropomorphological view for the human cognition of dimensional relations are discussed and underpinned with empirical results.

[1]  P. Brown The INs and ONs of Tzeltal locative expressions: the semantics of static descriptions of location , 1994 .

[2]  S. Isard,et al.  Children's deictic and nondeictic interpretations of the spatial locatives in front of and behind , 1990, Journal of Child Language.

[3]  G. G. Abkarian Comprehension of deictic locatives: The object “Behind” it , 1982 .

[4]  Veronika Ehrich,et al.  Discourse organization and sentence form: The structure of room descriptions in Dutch∗ , 1983 .

[5]  Jan J. Koenderink,et al.  Limits in perception , 1984 .

[6]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  Spatial Perspective in Descriptions , 1996 .

[7]  Claudia Brugman,et al.  Story of over , 1983 .

[8]  Gudula Retz-Schmidt,et al.  Various Views on Spatial Prepositions , 1988, AI Mag..

[9]  Ewald Lang The meaning of German projective prepositions: A two-level approach , 1993 .

[10]  Annette Herskovits,et al.  Language and spatial cognition , 1986 .

[11]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  Perspective taking and ellipsis in spatial descriptions , 1996 .

[12]  Paul U. Lee,et al.  How Space Structures Language , 1998, Spatial Cognition.

[13]  Leonard Talmy,et al.  How Language Structures Space , 1983 .

[14]  George A. Miller,et al.  Factors Affecting the Use of Dimensional Prepositions in German and American English: Object Orientation, Social Context, and Prepositional Pattern , 2000 .

[15]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  Searching Imagined Environments , 1990 .

[16]  H. H. Clark SPACE, TIME, SEMANTICS, AND THE CHILD , 1973 .

[17]  Pauline Réage,et al.  The Story of O , 1995 .

[18]  Clifford Hill,et al.  Up/down, front/back, left/right. A contrastive study of Hausa and English , 1982 .

[19]  S. Levinson Frames of reference and Molyneux's question: Cross-linguistic evidence , 1996 .

[20]  W. Levelt Cognitive styles in the use of spatial direction terms , 1982 .

[21]  Soteria Svorou,et al.  The grammar of space , 1994 .

[22]  F. Ameka,et al.  The linguistic construction of space in Ewe , 1995 .

[23]  Priska-Monika Hottenroth,et al.  Prepositions and object concepts: A contribution to cognitive semantics , 1993 .

[24]  J. Grabowski,et al.  The prepositional inventory of languages: A factor that affects comprehension of spatial prepositions , 1996 .

[25]  K. Bühler Sprachtheorie: Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache , 1934 .

[26]  Theo Herrmann,et al.  Sprechen : Psychologie der Sprachproduktion , 1994 .

[27]  C. Tanz Studies in the acquisition of deictic terms , 1983 .

[28]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  Some Perceptual Limitations on Talking About Space , 1984 .

[29]  B. Tversky,et al.  Internal and external spatial frameworks for representing described scenes , 1992 .

[30]  David E. Irwin,et al.  Frames of reference in vision and language: Where is above? , 1993, Cognition.

[31]  G. Miller,et al.  Language and Perception , 1976 .

[32]  William Stern Raum und zeit als personale dimensionen , 1936 .

[33]  B. Landau,et al.  “What” and “where” in spatial language and spatial cognition , 1993 .