The effectiveness of eight nonpharmaceutical interventions against COVID-19 in 41 countries

Governments are attempting to control the COVID-19 pandemic with nonpharmaceutical interventions (NPIs). However, it is still largely unknown how effective different NPIs are at reducing transmission. Data-driven studies can estimate the effectiveness of NPIs while minimizing assumptions, but existing analyses lack sufficient data and validation to robustly distinguish the effects of individual NPIs.We collect chronological data on NPIs in 41 countries between January and May 2020, using independent double entry by researchers to ensure high data quality. We estimate NPI effectiveness with a Bayesian hierarchical model, by linking NPI implementation dates to national case and death counts. To our knowledge, this is the largest and most thoroughly validated data-driven study of NPI effectiveness to date.We model each NPI’s effect as a multiplicative (percentage) reduction in the reproduction number R. We estimate the mean reduction in R across the countries in our data for eight NPIs: mandating mask-wearing in (some) public spaces (2%; 95% CI: −14%–16%), limiting gatherings to 1000 people or less (2%; −20%–22%), to 100 people or less (21%; 1%–39%), to 10 people or less (36%; 16%–53%), closing some high-risk businesses (31%; 13%–46%), closing most nonessential businesses (40%; 22%–55%), closing schools and universities (39%; 21%–55%), and issuing stay-at-home orders (18%; 4%–31%). These results are supported by extensive empirical validation, including 15 sensitivity analyses.Our results suggest that, by implementing effective NPIs, many countries can reduce R below 1 without issuing a stay-at-home order. We find a surprisingly large role for school and university closures in reducing COVID-19 transmission, a contribution to the ongoing debate about the relevance of asymptomatic carriers in disease spread. Banning gatherings and closing high-risk businesses can be highly effective in reducing transmission, but closing most businesses only has limited additional benefit.

[1]  Cindy Cheng,et al.  COVID-19 Government Response Event Dataset (CoronaNet v.1.0) , 2020, Nature Human Behaviour.

[2]  E. S. FONFRIA,et al.  Essential epidemiological parameters of COVID-19 for clinical and mathematical modeling purposes: a rapid review and meta-analysis , 2020, medRxiv.

[3]  Fredrik Bagge Carlson,et al.  On the sensitivity of non-pharmaceutical intervention models for SARS-CoV-2 spread estimation , 2020, medRxiv.

[4]  Yuan Wang,et al.  Identifying airborne transmission as the dominant route for the spread of COVID-19 , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  T. Colbourn,et al.  Modelling the Health and Economic Impacts of Population-Wide Testing, Contact Tracing and Isolation (PTTI) Strategies for COVID-19 in the UK , 2020, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[6]  G. Biele,et al.  An analysis of SARS-CoV-2 viral load by patient age , 2020, medRxiv.

[7]  Luna Yue Huang,et al.  The effect of large-scale anti-contagion policies on the COVID-19 pandemic , 2020, Nature.

[8]  S. Yadav,et al.  Basic Reproduction Rate and Case Fatality Rate of COVID-19: Application of Meta-analysis , 2020, medRxiv.

[9]  J. M. Griffin,et al.  Rapid review of available evidence on the serial interval and generation time of COVID-19 , 2020, BMJ Open.

[10]  J. Naudé,et al.  Worldwide Effectiveness of Various Non-Pharmaceutical Intervention Control Strategies on the Global COVID-19 Pandemic: A Linearised Control Model , 2020, medRxiv.

[11]  G. Torriani,et al.  Shedding of infectious SARS-CoV-2 in symptomatic neonates, children and adolescents , 2020, medRxiv.

[12]  A. Vespignani,et al.  Changes in contact patterns shape the dynamics of the COVID-19 outbreak in China , 2020, Science.

[13]  A. Rinaldo,et al.  Spread and dynamics of the COVID-19 epidemic in Italy: Effects of emergency containment measures , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  N. Banholzer,et al.  Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions on documented cases of COVID-19 , 2020, medRxiv.

[15]  P. Klepac,et al.  The effect of inter-city travel restrictions on geographical spread of COVID-19: Evidence from Wuhan, China , 2020, medRxiv.

[16]  P. Gallian,et al.  Cluster of COVID-19 in northern France: A retrospective closed cohort study , 2020, medRxiv.

[17]  M. Siedner,et al.  Social distancing to slow the U.S. COVID-19 epidemic: an interrupted time-series analysis , 2020, medRxiv.

[18]  D. Brockmann,et al.  Effective containment explains subexponential growth in recent confirmed COVID-19 cases in China , 2020, Science.

[19]  Joao Pinheiro Neto,et al.  Inferring change points in the COVID-19 spreading reveals the effectiveness of interventions , 2020 .

[20]  Quentin J. Leclerc,et al.  Quantifying the impact of physical distance measures on the transmission of COVID-19 in the UK , 2020, BMC Medicine.

[21]  G. Barbastathis,et al.  Neural Network aided quarantine control model estimation of global Covid-19 spread , 2020, 2004.02752.

[22]  C. Faes,et al.  Estimating the generation interval for coronavirus disease (COVID-19) based on symptom onset data, March 2020 , 2020, Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin.

[23]  C. Whittaker,et al.  Estimates of the severity of coronavirus disease 2019: a model-based analysis , 2020, The Lancet Infectious Diseases.

[24]  Nuno R. Faria,et al.  The effect of human mobility and control measures on the COVID-19 epidemic in China , 2020, Science.

[25]  C. Langenberg,et al.  SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19): What Do We Know About Children? A Systematic Review , 2020, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[26]  Lucie Abeler-Dörner,et al.  Quantifying SARS-CoV-2 transmission suggests epidemic control with digital contact tracing , 2020, Science.

[27]  N. Curtis,et al.  Coronavirus Infections in Children Including COVID-19 , 2020, The Pediatric infectious disease journal.

[28]  Yongsheng Wu,et al.  Epidemiology and Transmission of COVID-19 in Shenzhen China: Analysis of 391 cases and 1,286 of their close contacts , 2020, medRxiv.

[29]  J. Rocklöv,et al.  The reproductive number of COVID-19 is higher compared to SARS coronavirus , 2020, Journal of travel medicine.

[30]  Yang Liu,et al.  Early dynamics of transmission and control of COVID-19: a mathematical modelling study , 2020, The Lancet Infectious Diseases.

[31]  Jing Zhao,et al.  Early Transmission Dynamics in Wuhan, China, of Novel Coronavirus–Infected Pneumonia , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[32]  N. Linton,et al.  Incubation Period and Other Epidemiological Characteristics of 2019 Novel Coronavirus Infections with Right Truncation: A Statistical Analysis of Publicly Available Case Data , 2020, medRxiv.

[33]  Wes Hinsley,et al.  A simple approach to measure transmissibility and forecast incidence , 2017, Epidemics.

[34]  Christopher Winship,et al.  Multicollinearity and Model Misspecification , 2016 .

[35]  John Salvatier,et al.  Probabilistic programming in Python using PyMC3 , 2016, PeerJ Comput. Sci..

[36]  C. Fraser,et al.  A New Framework and Software to Estimate Time-Varying Reproduction Numbers During Epidemics , 2013, American journal of epidemiology.

[37]  Aki Vehtari,et al.  Understanding predictive information criteria for Bayesian models , 2013, Statistics and Computing.

[38]  Andrew Gelman,et al.  The No-U-turn sampler: adaptively setting path lengths in Hamiltonian Monte Carlo , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[39]  Cosma Rohilla Shalizi,et al.  Philosophy and the practice of Bayesian statistics. , 2010, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[40]  A. Flahault,et al.  Estimating the impact of school closure on influenza transmission from Sentinel data , 2008, Nature.

[41]  C. Fraser Estimating Individual and Household Reproduction Numbers in an Emerging Epidemic , 2007, PloS one.

[42]  M. Lipsitch,et al.  How generation intervals shape the relationship between growth rates and reproductive numbers , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[43]  Carl E. Rasmussen,et al.  Gaussian processes for machine learning , 2005, Adaptive computation and machine learning.

[44]  A. Kennedy,et al.  Hybrid Monte Carlo , 1988 .

[45]  G. Andrew,et al.  arm: Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models , 2014 .

[46]  Damaris Zurell,et al.  Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance , 2013 .

[47]  J. Robins,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis for Selection bias and unmeasured Confounding in missing Data and Causal inference models , 2000 .

[48]  D. Rubin,et al.  Assessing Sensitivity to an Unobserved Binary Covariate in an Observational Study with Binary Outcome , 1983 .