Semiconductor Manufacturing Technologies Organizing R&D Consortia for Path Creation and Extension: The Case of

Taking issue with the classical theory of path dependence, we capture the active agency involved in collective efforts aimed at extending a current technological path and, in parallel, at creating a new path in the field of leading-edge international semiconductor manufacturing. We apply structuration theory in order to analyse the practices of path constitution that traditional evolutionary views of lock-in and irreversibility in path processes have neglected. Drawing on 96 interviews since 2003 and extensive secondary sources in the field of semiconductor manufacturing in Europe, Japan and the United States, we perform a qualitative, longitudinal and multi-level case analysis; in this analysis we trace, in particular, the strategic development of a path-extending technological option besides a potentially path-breaking new generation of lithography for chip manufacturing systems. Our results provide deep insights into the collective and collaborative dimension of organizing R&D in processes of technology development. Thereby, we contribute to a theory of technological paths that considers collective embedded agency and takes into account interorganizational forms for an understanding of the innovation dynamics in science-based industries such as semiconductor manufacturing. Corresponding author: Jörg Sydow, Freie Universität Berlin, Department of Management, Boltzmannstr. 20, D-14195 Berlin, Germany. Email: joerg.sydow@fu-berlin.de 448029OSS33710.1177/0170840612448029Sydow et al.Organization Studies 2012

[1]  Arvind Parkhe,et al.  Orchestrating Innovation Networks , 2006 .

[2]  Thomas P. Hughes,et al.  Networks Of Power , 1983 .

[3]  A. Kumaraswamy,et al.  INSTITUTIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN THE SPONSORSHIP OF COMMON TECHNOLOGICAL STANDARDS: THE CASE OF SUN MICROSYSTEMS AND JAVA * , 2002 .

[4]  Robert T. Teranishi,et al.  Institutional Change and the Transformative Potential of the University , 2005 .

[5]  Judy C. Shetler,et al.  Building Cooperation in a Competitive Industry: Sematech and the Semiconductor Industry , 1995 .

[6]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[7]  Jochen Koch Inscribed Strategies: Exploring the Organizational Nature of Strategic Lock-in , 2011 .

[8]  A. Giddens The Constitution of Society , 1985 .

[9]  Sof Thrane,et al.  Innovative path dependence: Making sense of product and service innovation in path dependent innovation processes , 2010 .

[10]  W. Orlikowski The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations , 2014 .

[11]  Janice Golda Managing New Technology Risk in the Supply Chain , 2007 .

[12]  G. Dosi,et al.  Technological Paradigms and Trajectories , 2007 .

[13]  N. Denzin,et al.  The Research Act in Sociology. , 1973 .

[14]  Elias G. Carayannis,et al.  Strategy, structure and performance issues of pre-competitive R&D consortia: insights and lessons learned from SEMATECH , 2001, PICMET '01. Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology. Proceedings Vol.1: Book of Summaries (IEEE Cat. No.01CH37199).

[15]  Sigrid Quack,et al.  Overcoming path dependency: path generation in open systems , 2007 .

[16]  David C. Mowery,et al.  National Technology Policy in Global Markets: Developing Next-Generation Lithography in the Semiconductor Industry , 2000, Business and Politics.

[17]  Mariko Sakakibara,et al.  Formation of R&D consortia: industry and company effects , 2002 .

[18]  Wilfred Dolfsma,et al.  Path dependence and metaroutines: The genesis and development of the Toyota production system , 2009 .

[19]  Arie Rip,et al.  Technological agglomeration and the emergence of clusters and networks in nanotechnology , 2007, 0911.2982.

[20]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  A Collective Action Model of Institutional Innovation , 2006 .

[21]  Andrew J. Hoffman,et al.  INSTITUTIONAL EVOLUTION AND CHANGE: ENVIRONMENTALISM AND THE US CHEMICAL INDUSTRY , 1999 .

[22]  Marc Gruber,et al.  Exploring the Origins of Organizational Paths: Empirical Evidence From Newly Founded Firms , 2010 .

[23]  J. Schumpeter Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1943 .

[24]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs: A Cyclical Model of Technological Change , 1990 .

[25]  George L.-T. Chiu,et al.  Optical lithography: Introduction , 1997, IBM J. Res. Dev..

[26]  유창조 Naturalistic Inquiry , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[27]  Henri Schildt,et al.  Path Dependence of Power Relations, Path-Breaking Change and Technological Adaptation , 2011 .

[28]  M. Tushman,et al.  On the Organizational Determinants of Technological Change: Towards a Sociology of Technological Evolution , 1992 .

[29]  Greg Linden,et al.  Chips and Change: How Crisis Reshapes the Semiconductor Industry , 2009 .

[30]  W. Arthur,et al.  INCREASING RETURNS AND LOCK-IN BY HISTORICAL EVENTS , 1989 .

[31]  Marc Schneiberg,et al.  What's on the path? Path dependence, organizational diversity and the problem of institutional change in the US economy, 1900-1950 , 2007 .

[32]  R. Garud,et al.  Inter-generational transitions in socio-technical systems: The case of mobile communications , 2009 .

[33]  Elias G. Carayannis,et al.  Strategy, structure, and performance issues of precompetitive R&D consortia: insights and lessons learned from SEMATECH , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[34]  S. Kvale The Social Construction of Validity , 1995 .

[35]  D. North Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance: Economic performance , 1990 .

[36]  R. Greenwood,et al.  Institutional Entrepreneurship in Mature Fields: The Big Five Accounting Firms , 2006 .

[37]  Pamela S. Tolbert,et al.  Institutionalization and Structuration: Studying the Links between Action and Institution , 1997 .

[38]  Cornelius Schubert,et al.  Integrating path dependency and path creation in a general understanding of path constitution. The role of agency and institutions in the stabilisation of technological innovations , 2007 .

[39]  Raghu Garud,et al.  Path Dependence or Path Creation? , 2010 .

[40]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  A Dynamic Theory of Expertise and Occupational Boundaries in New Technology Implementation: Building on Barley's Study of CT Scanning , 2004 .

[41]  D. North Competing Technologies , Increasing Returns , and Lock-In by Historical Events , 1994 .

[42]  Cornelius Schubert Technology Roadmapping in der Halbleiterindustrie: das Hier und Jetzt technologischer Zukünfte am Beispiel der International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors , 2007 .

[43]  Mark J. Safferstone Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy , 1999 .

[44]  Larry D. Browning,et al.  The structuring of shared voluntary standards in the U.S. semiconductor industry: Communicating to reach agreement , 1998 .

[45]  C. Freeman Networks of innovators: A synthesis of research issues , 1991 .

[46]  G.E. Moore,et al.  Cramming More Components Onto Integrated Circuits , 1998, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[47]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[48]  George A. Akerlof Path dependence, its critics and the quest for 'historical economics' , 2002 .

[49]  P. David Clio and the Economics of QWERTY , 1985 .

[50]  Richard N. Langlois,et al.  Capabilities and Vertical Disintegration in Process Technology: The Case of Semiconductor Fabrication Equipment , 1994 .

[51]  Whitney Berta,et al.  The Ties that Bind: Strategic Actions and Status Structure in the US Investment Banking Industry , 2002 .

[52]  Kalle Pajunen,et al.  The Nature of Organizational Mechanisms , 2008 .

[53]  Guido Möllering Collective market-making efforts at an engineering conference , 2010 .

[54]  Larry D. Browning,et al.  Sematech: Saving the U. S. Semiconductor Industry , 2000 .

[55]  J. Mahoney Path dependence in historical sociology , 2000 .

[56]  Hiroyuki Chuma Increasing complexity and limits of organization in the microlithography industry: implications for science-based industries , 2006 .

[57]  M. Pozzebon,et al.  The Influence of a Structurationist View on Strategic Management Research , 2004 .

[58]  Hal R. Varian,et al.  Information rules - a strategic guide to the network economy , 1999 .

[59]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[60]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[61]  R. Martin,et al.  Path dependence and regional economic evolution , 2006 .

[62]  S. Barley Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. , 1986, Administrative science quarterly.

[63]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Explaining Development and Change in Organizations , 1995 .

[64]  T. Jick Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action. , 1979 .

[65]  Arnold Windeler,et al.  Kreation technologischer Pfade: ein strukturationstheoretischer Analyseansatz , 2003 .

[66]  Greg Linden,et al.  The Evolving Role of Semiconductor Consortia in the United States and Japan , 1998 .

[67]  Hans Berends,et al.  Contacts and Contracts: Cross-Level Network Dynamics in the Development of an Aircraft Material , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[68]  Raghu Garud,et al.  Path Creation as a Process of Mindful Deviation , 2013 .

[69]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  Networks of Innovators , 2006 .

[70]  David C. Mowery,et al.  SEMATECH and collaborative research: Lessons in the design of high‐technology consortia , 1994 .

[71]  Georg Schreyögg,et al.  Organizational Path Dependence: Opening the Black Box , 2009 .

[72]  Koen Frenken,et al.  Toward a Systematic Framework for Research on Dominant Designs, Technological Innovations, and Industrial Change , 2005 .

[73]  Fernando F. Suarez Battles for Technological Dominance: An Integrative Framework , 2004 .

[74]  Mark S. LeClair Cartelization, Antitrust and Globalization in the US and Europe , 2010 .

[75]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Using Cooperative Research and Development Agreements as S&T Indicators: What do We Have and What Would We Like? , 2003, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[76]  P. Pierson Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics , 2000, American Political Science Review.

[77]  David Stark,et al.  Path Dependence and Privatization Strategies in East Central Europe , 1991 .

[78]  W. Abernathy,et al.  The Productivity Dilemma: Roadblock t o Znnovation in the Automobile Industry , 1978 .

[79]  J. Hagedoorn Inter-firm R&D partnerships: an overview of major trends and patterns since 1960 , 2002 .

[80]  Raghu Garud,et al.  Institutional Entrepreneurship as Embedded Agency: An Introduction to the Special Issue , 2007 .

[81]  Yves L. Doz,et al.  Formation processes of R&D consortia: which path to take? Where does it lead? , 2000 .

[82]  Huseyin Leblebici,et al.  Institutional Change and the Transformation of Interorganizational Fields: An Organizational History of the U.S. Radio Broadcasting Industry , 1991 .

[83]  Wolfgang Streeck,et al.  Introduction: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies , 2005 .

[84]  J. Sydow,et al.  Project Networks and Changing Industry Practices Collaborative Content Production in the German Television Industry , 2001 .

[85]  Udo H. Staber,et al.  Planning for Path Dependence? The Case of a Network in the Berlin-Brandenburg Optics Cluster , 2010 .