Auditory and auditory-visual perception of clear and conversational speech.

Research has shown that speaking in a deliberately clear manner can improve the accuracy of auditory speech recognition. Allowing listeners access to visual speech cues also enhances speech understanding. Whether the nature of information provided by speaking clearly and by using visual speech cues is redundant has not been determined. This study examined how speaking mode (clear vs. conversational) and presentation mode (auditory vs. auditory-visual) influenced the perception of words within nonsense sentences. In Experiment 1, 30 young listeners with normal hearing responded to videotaped stimuli presented audiovisually in the presence of background noise at one of three signal-to-noise ratios. In Experiment 2, 9 participants returned for an additional assessment using auditory-only presentation. Results of these experiments showed significant effects of speaking mode (clear speech was easier to understand than was conversational speech) and presentation mode (auditory-visual presentation led to better performance than did auditory-only presentation). The benefit of clear speech was greater for words occurring in the middle of sentences than for words at either the beginning or end of sentences for both auditory-only and auditory-visual presentation, whereas the greatest benefit from supplying visual cues was for words at the end of sentences spoken both clearly and conversationally. The total benefit from speaking clearly and supplying visual cues was equal to the sum of each of these effects. Overall, the results suggest that speaking clearly and providing visual speech information provide complementary (rather than redundant) information.

[1]  E. Owens,et al.  Visemes observed by hearing-impaired and normal-hearing adult viewers. , 1985, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[2]  L. Braida,et al.  Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing IV: Further studies of the role of speaking rate. , 1996, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[3]  L D Braida,et al.  Intelligibility of conversational and clear speech in noise and reverberation for listeners with normal and impaired hearing. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Sharon Lesner,et al.  Effect of talker differences on speechreading by hearing-impaired teenagers , 1985 .

[5]  Q. Summerfield,et al.  Intermodal timing relations and audio-visual speech recognition by normal-hearing adults. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  Louis D. Braida,et al.  Evaluating the articulation index for auditory-visual input. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  L. Braida Crossmodal Integration in the Identification of Consonant Segments , 1991, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[8]  D J Schum,et al.  Intelligibility of clear and conversational speech of young and elderly talkers. , 1996, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[9]  N I Durlach,et al.  Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing I: Intelligibility differences between clear and conversational speech. , 1985, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[10]  W. H. Sumby,et al.  Visual contribution to speech intelligibility in noise , 1954 .

[11]  L L Elliott,et al.  Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Q. Summerfield Some preliminaries to a comprehensive account of audio-visual speech perception. , 1987 .

[13]  B. Walden,et al.  Effects of training on the visual recognition of consonants. , 1977, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[14]  M. Picheny,et al.  Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing. II: Acoustic characteristics of clear and conversational speech. , 1986, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[15]  Jean-Pierre Gagné,et al.  Auditory, Visual, and Audiovisual Speech Intelligibility for Sentence-Length Stimuli: An Investigation of Conversational and Clear Speech. , 1995 .

[16]  J. O'neill Contributions of the visual components of oral symbols to speech comprehension. , 1954, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.