A qualitative and quantitative assessment of the impact of three processing algorithms with halving of study count statistics in myocardial perfusion imaging: filtered backprojection, maximal likelihood expectation maximisation and ordered subset expectation maximisation with resolution recovery

IntroductionOrdered subset expectation maximisation with depth-dependent resolution recovery (OSEM-RR) is a processing algorithm reported to improve images with halved tracer activity in myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) compared to filtered backprojection (FBP) using conventional activities. OSEM-RR has not yet been compared with maximal likelihood expectation maximisation (MLEM).Methods39 patients undergoing MPS and two anthropomorphic phantoms (one with, one without an inferior wall insert) had full-time (FT) and half-time (HT) SPECT datasets acquired simultaneously and processed by FBP, MLEM and OSEM-RR. Two experienced reporters scored images of all clinical studies (n=234) for conspicuity of a perfusion defect, with results being compared using Wilcoxon paired and Kappa tests. A quantitative assessment based on mean segmental pixel counts taken from numbers automatically displayed over the 20 segments of Cedars Sinai Autoquant QPS image were compared using Pearson’s correlation and Bland Altman analysis.ResultsA small but consistent superior concurrence between FT and HT datasets for OSEM-RR compared to FBP and MLEM was observed for both qualitative and quantitative analyses. OSEM-RR resulted in better definition of the inferior wall defect on the phantom study.ConclusionOSEM-RR appears superior to both FBP and MLEM in terms of handling reduced count statistics.

[1]  Linda K. Shaw,et al.  Clinical results of a novel wide beam reconstruction method for shortening scan time of Tc-99m cardiac SPECT perfusion studies , 2007, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[2]  S. Underwood,et al.  Procedure guidelines for radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging. , 2004, Heart.

[3]  J. Case,et al.  A multicenter evaluation of a new post-processing method with depth-dependent collimator resolution applied to full-time and half-time acquisitions without and with simultaneously acquired attenuation correction , 2009, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[4]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Practical statistics for medical research , 1990 .

[5]  H. Malcolm Hudson,et al.  Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[6]  L. Shepp,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Emission Tomography , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  Value of the History and Physical in Identifying Patients at Increased Risk for Coronary Artery Disease , 1993 .

[8]  J. Ballinger.  Short- and long-term responses to molybdenum-99 shortages in nuclear medicine. , 2010, The British journal of radiology.

[9]  E. Gordon DePuey,et al.  Ordered subset expectation maximization and wide beam reconstruction “half-time” gated myocardial perfusion SPECT functional imaging: A comparison to “full-time” filtered backprojection , 2008, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[10]  E. Depuey,et al.  Wide beam reconstruction “quarter-time” gated myocardial perfusion SPECT functional imaging: a comparison to “full-time” ordered subset expectation maximum , 2009, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[11]  E. Ficaro,et al.  15.34: Effect of reconstruction parameters and acquisition times on myocardial perfusion distribution in normals , 2008 .

[12]  E. Gordon DePuey,et al.  A comparison of the image quality of full-time myocardial perfusion SPECT vs wide beam reconstruction half-time and half-dose SPECT , 2011, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.