Identification of broad-leaved dock (Rumex obtusifolius L.) on grassland by means of digital image processing

Digital image processing has the potential to support the identification of plant species required for site-specific weed control in grassland swards. The present study focuses on the identification of one of the most invasive and persistent weed species on European grassland, the broad-leaved dock (Rumex obtusifolius L., R.o.), in complex mixtures of perennial ryegrass with R.o. and other herbs.A total of 108 digital photographs were obtained from a field experiment under constant recording geometry and illumination conditions. An object-oriented image classification was performed. Image segmentation was done by transforming the red, green, blue (RGB) colour images to greyscale intensity images. Based on that, local homogeneity images were calculated and a homogeneity threshold (0.97) was applied to derive binary images. Finally, morphological opening was performed. The remaining contiguous regions were considered to be objects. Features describing shape, colour and texture were calculated for each of these objects. A Maximum-likelihood classification was done to discriminate between the weed species. In addition, rank analysis was used to test how combinations of features influenced the classification result.The detection rate of R.o. varied with the training dataset used for classification. Average R.o. detection rates ranged from 71 to 95% for the 108 images, which included more than 3,600 objects. Misclassifications of R.o. occurred mainly with Plantago major (P.m.). Between 9 and 16% R.o. objects were classified incorrectly as P.m. and 17–24% P.m. objects were misclassified as R.o. The classification result was influenced by the defined object classes (R.o., P.m., T.o., soil, residue vs. R.o., residue). For instance, classification rates were 86–91% and 65–82% for R.o. exclusively and R.o. against the remaining herb species, respectively.

[1]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern Classification , 1973 .

[2]  W. Petry,et al.  Automatisierte Unterscheidung von Unkrautarten nach Formparametern mit Hilfe der quantitativen Bildanalyse , 1989 .

[3]  James H. Everitt,et al.  Use of Remote Sensing for Detecting and Mapping Leafy Spurge (Euphorbia esula) , 1995, Weed Technology.

[4]  Rademacher,et al.  Long‐term effects of fertilizer on soil nutrient concentration, yield, forage quality and floristic composition of a hay meadow in the Eifel mountains, Germany , 1999 .

[5]  K. Hurle,et al.  Site-specific weed control - from weed recording to herbicide application. , 2000 .

[6]  Roland Gerhards,et al.  Precision weed control - more than just saving herbicides. , 2000 .

[7]  Ying Sun,et al.  A hierarchical approach to color image segmentation using homogeneity , 2000, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[8]  Pierre Soille,et al.  Morphological image analysis applied to crop field mapping , 2000, Image Vis. Comput..

[9]  John A. Marchant,et al.  Comparison of a Bayesian classifier with a multilayer feed-forward neural network using the example of plant/weed/soil discrimination , 2003 .

[10]  Johann G. Zaller,et al.  Ecology and non-chemical control of Rumex crispus and R. obtusifolius (Polygonaceae): a review , 2004 .

[11]  Helge Bonesmo *,et al.  Evaluating an image analysis system for mapping white clover pastures , 2004 .

[12]  Da-Wen Sun,et al.  Recent developments in the applications of image processing techniques for food quality evaluation , 2004 .

[13]  David G. Stork,et al.  Computer Manual in MATLAB to Accompany Pattern Classification, Second Edition , 2004 .

[14]  Jacob T. Mundt,et al.  Hyperspectral data processing for repeat detection of small infestations of leafy spurge , 2005 .

[15]  T. F. Burks,et al.  Evaluation of Neural-network Classifiers for Weed Species Discrimination , 2005 .